Jump to content

User contributions for Maxmibsb

A user with 60 edits. Account created on 2 August 2023.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

13 December 2024

  • 10:5510:55, 13 December 2024 diff hist +489 Moldovans Undid revision 1262828413 by Anonimu (talk) Undoing unjustified rev of removing OPs POV. OP unable to elaborate which bits are POV. You should also note that most of the stuff I cut out was plucked in by yourself, therefore it is your POV. If you continue to blanket undo just to substantiate your unfounded POV, I will request arbitration. Inform yourself on what the article looked like before you messed with it. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit

12 December 2024

11 December 2024

10 December 2024

7 December 2024

  • 23:3023:30, 7 December 2024 diff hist +1,454 Moldovans added lots of links, added new up-to-date info both on the 2024 census, as well as on dual moldovan-romanian identity, fixed typos and grammar mistakes, added bit on cahul and ismail being part of moldavia and romania from 1856 to 1878. Tags: Reverted Visual edit: Switched
  • 22:5122:51, 7 December 2024 diff hist +3 Moldovans reverted brief description to what it is before (romanian-speaking). calling moldovans "romance" is a bit of a stretch because unlike slavs, who all share common ancestry, romance speaking countries don't necessarily (france and gauls, portuguese and goths, etc.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit: Switched
  • 22:4822:48, 7 December 2024 diff hist −55 m Moldovans not useful; there is enough confusion about this already, especially to outsiders/newcomers. the language is romanian, its local name should not feature in the first paragraph as it's a nuance that is better left for the in-depth bits. i get ur point but people reading it in a rush or not in the know might not. Tags: Reverted Visual edit

22 October 2024

14 September 2024

13 September 2024

12 September 2024

  • 20:4820:48, 12 September 2024 diff hist +141 Union of Bessarabia with Romania Added a reference to the only claim that might require it Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 20:4320:43, 12 September 2024 diff hist +254 Union of Bessarabia with Romania Undid the unreferenced, and unsubstantiated claims in anonimu's reversal. The added information does not require citations because almost everything is well-known (such as the timeline of who controlled Bessarabia, the fact that North Bukovina was not part of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, etc.) Anonimu refuses to engage with the individual edits, instead resorting to a blanket "undo", akin to what he learned in the Moldovan SSR. If he continues I will request arbitration. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

7 September 2024

  • 21:4321:43, 7 September 2024 diff hist −18 Ivanna Sakhno No sources anywhere online that she naturalized as a US citizen, and took on that as her primary nationality. Not to mention Ukraine prohibits dual citizenship (can be bypassed but not by someone of her status, who works with the Ukrainian government). She has been living in the US for 10 years though so US-based kinda does that justice. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

6 September 2024

29 August 2024

13 August 2024

28 July 2024

16 July 2024

12 June 2024

20 February 2024

  • 03:0303:03, 20 February 2024 diff hist +328 Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran Something interesting I recently found out. Not the best source per se, but it's the only one in English - I've crossed checked it with Google Image search, and it leads to multiple Farsi articles of his Monegasque passport being leaked. It also looks legit by itself. I'm assuming he never naturalized in the US, or anywhere else as it would require submitting a pledge of allegiance, thereby de-facto surrendering his position as crown prince. Tag: Visual edit

20 January 2024

19 January 2024

  • 15:2615:26, 19 January 2024 diff hist −22 Americans Again, to reiterate my point. Nowhere is it defined in any law, or argued by any scholar that American culture is defined as being a national thereof and taking a pledge of alliance. This is misleading. American culture exists as a stand-alone thing, and there are plenty of US nationals who don't identify with American culture (mostly those with an immigrant background). Instead of merely undoing the edit, maybe come out with a credible and well put-together rebuttal? Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)