Jump to content

User contributions for Morton Thiokol

A user with 59 edits. Account created on 28 October 2018.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

20 July 2023

13 July 2022

21 December 2019

14 December 2019

13 December 2019

5 November 2019

  • 13:2813:28, 5 November 2019 diff hist +28 Steele dossier We don’t know what anonymous sources believe. The Telegraph reported that their anonymous sources believe certain things. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:2313:23, 5 November 2019 diff hist +2,120 User talk:Laser brain DS: new section Tags: contentious topics alert Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:1913:19, 5 November 2019 diff hist +344 User talk:Morton Thiokol Incorrect (duh): new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:1613:16, 5 November 2019 diff hist +29 People v. Turner “Where else does Wikipedia handle jury decisions this way?” Everywhere. United States v. Booker, the People vs. OJ Simpson, etc. It is an important distinction to make because it includes the very relevant fact that the jury found it to be so, while the ME did not. Again, this is the very reason we write - throughout Wikipedia and all *unbiased* scholarly journals - whether the jury found it to be so, or whether the evidence proved it to be so regardless of the jury. In some cases, people... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 13:0913:09, 5 November 2019 diff hist +4 Chanel Miller When she came into the public eye the case had not yet been tried, and at that time the assault was alleged and he was a suspect. Since the sentence is about how she came into the public eye, the fact remains that she came into the public eye as a purported victim and he came into the public eye as a suspect. The sentence literally says “CAME INTO THE PUBLIC EYE AS,” *not* “LATER WAS FOUND TO BE.” Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

4 November 2019

  • 23:0223:02, 4 November 2019 diff hist +29 People v. Turner He was found guilty by a jury, not by proof of sexual assault. This distinction is the very foundation of understanding the difference between guilty on the basis of proof, and being found guilty by a jury. It is the same reason a person can be convicted of murder when the victim’s body hasn’t been found. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 22:5622:56, 4 November 2019 diff hist +19 Chanel Miller When she came into the public eye it was as Jane Doe, and at that time it had not been found that she was the victim of a sexual assault, nor had Turner been found guilty. In other words, when she CAME INTO THE PUBLIC EYE it was as an accuser; when Turner CAME INTO THE PUBLIC EYE it was as a suspect. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 October 2019

  • 17:4117:41, 28 October 2019 diff hist +24 People v. Turner It hasn’t been determined that Turner either did or did not sexually assault Miller, thus we must write that he has been convicted of it by a jury. This is why the rest of the Wiki entry here reflects this. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 17:3617:36, 28 October 2019 diff hist +19 Chanel Miller Nothing had been ruled at the time her identity as Emily Doe came to light; at that time Turner was a suspect, the crime was an allegation, and Miller/Doe was a purported victim, thus we cannot state that she first came to light as a victim of a crime at that time. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

7 October 2019

1 October 2019

9 September 2019

8 September 2019

31 August 2019

26 August 2019

13 April 2019

27 February 2019

  • 13:5513:55, 27 February 2019 diff hist +2,642 Talk:Toyota Hilux Model codes
  • 12:5312:53, 27 February 2019 diff hist +5 Toyota Hilux Undid revision 885314296 by Chaheel Riens (talk) I'm not using a "two wrongs" argument: I'm using public Toyota model codes. Other user who reverted my edits gave the fallacious "two wrongs" argument that "Others also use incorrect fragments of Toyota models, therefore you should do the same." If you think I'm using two wrongs, explain how Toyota model codes are wrong and arbitrary fragments are correct. Thanks in advance! :) Tag: Undo
  • 05:1305:13, 27 February 2019 diff hist +5 Toyota Hilux Undid revision 885249818 by Stepho-wrs (talk) "Two wrongs make a right" is in violation of Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Re:"Why should it be 5mm longer?" That +5mm difference is stated by Toyota Japan, right next to the -5mm shorter wheelbase. I'm giving correct Toyota model names and dimensions, from Toyota. Their data is much more valid than your puzzlement over "Why should it be so?" Tag: Undo

26 February 2019

  • 17:2217:22, 26 February 2019 diff hist +15 Toyota Hilux Undid revision 885090331 by Stepho-wrs (talk) Your reversion violates the community standards described in policies and guidelines, and is not how we "do model codes." We do not use arbitrary fragments of model codes. R model engines were not available in N series trucks, only in RN. Further, you completely deleted the RN22-HD entry, which also violates policies and guidelines. Tag: Undo

25 February 2019

23 February 2019

21 February 2019

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)