User contributions for OyMosby
Results for OyMosby talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 5,828 edits. Account created on 3 June 2017.
22 November 2024
- 20:1320:13, 22 November 2024 diff hist +16 Croatian Australians If your issue is this wording, I fixed it to be more clear. current
- 20:1220:12, 22 November 2024 diff hist +50 Croatian Australians Undid revision 1258981921 by Mudroslov (talk) The original wording up it being a puppet state and who established it is key to explaining why those calling the leader a traitor was a traitor. I do not understand the reasoning is obfuscating that. Please don’t remove cited content. Tag: Undo
- 17:2117:21, 22 November 2024 diff hist +181 Croatian Australians Undid revision 1258965954 by Mudroslov (talk) It absolutely is relevant and needed context as to why the leader was viewed as a traitor to Croatias. Otherwise readers would have no clue what the statement relates to. Tag: Undo
- 16:1716:17, 22 November 2024 diff hist +181 Croatian Australians Undid revision 1202089899 by Mudroslov (talk) previous grammar and context was better Tags: Undo Reverted
18 November 2024
- 17:0917:09, 18 November 2024 diff hist +11 Croats (military unit) Undid revision 1180818024 by 2603:9001:3700:6CA8:C108:B3B3:A0E2:8317 (talk) unexplained removal current Tag: Undo
17 November 2024
- 19:5419:54, 17 November 2024 diff hist +2 Robot →Etymology: Given the parenthesis are for Slavic languages, Hungarian should follow after outside of it.
- 19:4119:41, 17 November 2024 diff hist +66 Robot →Etymology: Other relevant Slavic languages
16 November 2024
- 03:4403:44, 16 November 2024 diff hist 0 Talk:Genocide of Serbs in the Independent State of Croatia Seems self explanatory why it would be far higher than mid importance. current
3 November 2024
- 05:1105:11, 3 November 2024 diff hist +15 Ustaše Covers both the start and throughout occupation as the original version did state “ever” but without repeating term “support” twice
- 04:2604:26, 3 November 2024 diff hist −18 Ustaše Undid revision 1255103022 by OyMosby (talk) actually last version more simple Tag: Undo
- 04:1904:19, 3 November 2024 diff hist +18 Ustaše No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 04:0704:07, 3 November 2024 diff hist +4 Ustaše In that case, consolidate
2 November 2024
- 11:4211:42, 2 November 2024 diff hist −673 Italians of Croatia →History: You pasted this twice over two edits word for word. Once here and once in the “Croatization” section. May want to check if information is repeated when copying sections from other articles.
1 November 2024
- 23:4323:43, 1 November 2024 diff hist +3 Talk:Sisak concentration camp Given location and involved victims, shouldn’t these be high?
- 23:4123:41, 1 November 2024 diff hist −575 Talk:Sisak concentration camp →What is this noncense?: removing personal commentary and attacks. Also not a forum. Made by IP user.
31 October 2024
- 17:1317:13, 31 October 2024 diff hist −75 Hundred Years' Croatian–Ottoman War Battle of Sisak already in intro. current
- 17:0917:09, 31 October 2024 diff hist +86 Hundred Years' Croatian–Ottoman War Not sure why this was removed. Covers the remnants part essentially too.
27 October 2024
- 19:5619:56, 27 October 2024 diff hist +1 Rijeka Way too minimized as pronouncing both versions is significant. Also bold make sense for the official current names. Otherwise confuses the reader.
26 October 2024
- 22:0322:03, 26 October 2024 diff hist +489 Talk:Šibenik →Foreign, non-English historical names: Reply current Tag: Reply
- 21:5921:59, 26 October 2024 diff hist +164 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Vrdi Input
23 October 2024
- 13:5213:52, 23 October 2024 diff hist −36 Talk:Ethnic cleansing →Foibe massacres: Didn’t see that other users had already begun responding. current
22 October 2024
- 22:2622:26, 22 October 2024 diff hist +608 Talk:Ethnic cleansing →Foibe massacres: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:2222:22, 22 October 2024 diff hist −6,686 Ethnic cleansing Undid revision 1252752322 by LukeWiller (talk) Standard practice is onus being on the proposed content and editor. It doesn’t make sense to have in the meantime. Tag: Undo
- 21:4221:42, 22 October 2024 diff hist +337 Talk:Ethnic cleansing →Foibe massacres: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:1621:16, 22 October 2024 diff hist +22 Talk:Ethnic cleansing →Foibe massacres: forgot one
- 21:0921:09, 22 October 2024 diff hist +239 Talk:Ethnic cleansing →Foibe massacres
- 21:0621:06, 22 October 2024 diff hist +399 Talk:Ethnic cleansing →Foibe massacres: Reply Tag: Reply
- 19:5519:55, 22 October 2024 diff hist +27 Battle of Nuštar Undid revision 1252743785 by 78.1.111.152 (talk) Makes sense per Red Spino’s explanation Tags: Undo Reverted
- 19:4619:46, 22 October 2024 diff hist −6,686 Ethnic cleansing Undid revision 1252635526 by LukeWiller (talk) Should start a discussion on the article’s talk page Tags: Undo Reverted
21 October 2024
- 23:2723:27, 21 October 2024 diff hist +1 Battle of Nuštar Capitalization and clarification. Per article sentence with multiple citations: “ the Serbs failed to meet their goals.”. So it doesn’t seem to confirm a strategic victory on their behalf.
- 23:2223:22, 21 October 2024 diff hist −63 Battle of Nuštar Undid revision 1252562411 by Red Spino (talk) Seems more word play than reality the sources portray. Other battles articles of the war grant victory to the standing territory not the one that damages it. We should be consistent. Unless there is a source explicitly saying the victory is for the opposing side. Tag: Undo
- 17:2017:20, 21 October 2024 diff hist +7 Foibe massacres Undid revision 1252267156 by Patar knight (talk) Removes part of the victim composition in contradiction either the article and sources. Tag: Undo
17 October 2024
- 22:3922:39, 17 October 2024 diff hist +179 User talk:LukeWiller →Split/Zadar/Rijeka/Šibenik InfoBox: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:3822:38, 17 October 2024 diff hist +1 User talk:LukeWiller →Split/Zadar/Rijeka/Šibenik InfoBox
- 22:3822:38, 17 October 2024 diff hist +866 User talk:LukeWiller →Split/Zadar/Rijeka/Šibenik InfoBox: Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:0522:05, 17 October 2024 diff hist +670 User talk:LukeWiller →Split/Zadar/Rijeka/Šibenik InfoBox: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:4021:40, 17 October 2024 diff hist +1,251 User talk:LukeWiller →Split/Zadar/Rijeka/Šibenik InfoBox: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:0821:08, 17 October 2024 diff hist +46 User talk:LukeWiller →Split/Zadar/Rijeka/Šibenik InfoBox
- 21:0521:05, 17 October 2024 diff hist +123 User talk:LukeWiller →Split/Zadar/Rijeka/Šibenik InfoBox
- 20:5620:56, 17 October 2024 diff hist +1,045 User talk:LukeWiller →Split/Zadar/Rijeka/Šibenik InfoBox: new section Tag: New topic
- 20:3720:37, 17 October 2024 diff hist +7 Split, Croatia Undid revision 1251740512 by OyMosby (talk) Actually I’m not sure how this is handled as putting “lang” removes the language hyperlink. Tag: Undo
- 20:3620:36, 17 October 2024 diff hist 0 Zadar Undid revision 1251739313 by OyMosby (talk) Tag: Undo
- 20:3420:34, 17 October 2024 diff hist −7 Split, Croatia Not sure how this change was an improvement. There were multiple previous names. Is this definitely the only native name? Tag: Reverted
- 20:2220:22, 17 October 2024 diff hist 0 Zadar Almost slipped by Tag: Reverted
- 20:2020:20, 17 October 2024 diff hist −17 Šibenik Partial revert. Once again, not the only historical name. To say it is contradicts the article. I have no issue with having the alternate name however give the stretch of history. Tag: Reverted
- 20:1620:16, 17 October 2024 diff hist −119 Split, Croatia Partial revert. Again as explained, not the only historical version of the name. Tag: Reverted
- 20:1320:13, 17 October 2024 diff hist −100 Zadar Partial revert. As previously explained, there are multiple historical names, Zadar and Zara and others are during different times. Undue to focus on one historical name. Tag: Reverted
9 October 2024
- 13:2313:23, 9 October 2024 diff hist +246 Talk:Josip Broz Tito →Infobox arrangement: Reply Tag: Reply
- 13:0213:02, 9 October 2024 diff hist +163 Talk:Josip Broz Tito →Infobox arrangement: clarification
- 12:4612:46, 9 October 2024 diff hist +223 Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking →MOS:GEOLINK for former countries/entities: Reply Tag: Reply
