Jump to content

User contributions for PedroPistolas

A user with 87 edits. Account created on 30 October 2019.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

12 September 2023

2 September 2023

11 August 2023

16 July 2023

4 May 2023

26 April 2023

4 April 2023

26 February 2023

15 February 2023

12 January 2023

11 January 2023

10 January 2023

9 January 2023

18 September 2022

  • 16:5516:55, 18 September 2022 diff hist −87 One-shot film there is a whole discussion about Rope and the consensus, given the sources and the film itself, is that Rope shouldn't be on this list yet this is the third time in few months that someone put it again in here

5 September 2022

29 August 2022

  • 08:1708:17, 29 August 2022 diff hist −211 South Korea generally states, north korea included, not have dates regarding the founding of predecessors (in europe you don't find 751 b.c. etc.) let alone highly mythological as this one. I'm removing everything until KPG because of the links between that and ROK but I won't protest if somedody removes it. If the previous dates are to be reinstated there should be a strong motivation and then one should add united Silla, Goryeo and Joseon.

5 August 2022

  • 06:4906:49, 5 August 2022 diff hist +7 South Korea added "(myth)" next to the date because that 2333 bce highly misleading given that as one can read in the hyperlink that date precedes historical attestations of a millenia and half and archeology tell us that korea was in prehistory Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

29 July 2022

  • 10:1210:12, 29 July 2022 diff hist −28 m Rope (film) removed an inapprorpiate category. see talk
  • 10:1010:10, 29 July 2022 diff hist −83 One-shot film Rope did spearheaded the technique of hidden cuts but it has clear cuts as explained in the talk. Please read the talk before editing
  • 10:0710:07, 29 July 2022 diff hist −549 Fusang that paragraph is redundant because it quotes once again Leland and de Guignes and theories as such; inserting theories in a quote is not a correct practice; a 1966 article by a designer on American Heritage is not a reputable source

13 July 2022

17 June 2022

6 June 2022

  • 16:3816:38, 6 June 2022 diff hist +675 Talk:Rope (film) Reliability of sources: Reply Tag: Reply
  • 10:0910:09, 6 June 2022 diff hist +203 Rope (film) I've already edited this page, I motivated it and cited sources but a mod found it more constructive to remove the source and reinstate a 404ed one. I opened a section in the talk and no one interviened so I'm rediting the page. As you can see from the talk the fact that this movie is edited to appear as a one shot is a myth easily disproved by just watching the film itself. In the page there is a series of timestamps and in the talk I put a slighty different list derived from the blu ray Tag: Reverted

23 May 2022

20 May 2022

19 May 2022

18 May 2022

17 May 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)