Jump to content

Japanese Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Replaced some words, removed two definite articles, one comma and a blank line and altered a link in the url parameter of the infobox to avoid a self-reference
unexplained revert, see talk consensus, rm unnecessary addition
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
Line 89: Line 89:
== Criticism ==
== Criticism ==
Attention was brought to the Japanese Wikipedia article about [[Kozo Iizuka]] ([[:ja:飯塚幸三]]), which describes his accomplishments in detail, but makes no mention of how he killed a woman and her young daughter in the [[Higashi-Ikebukuro runaway car accident]] that made him a household name in Japan. A small group of users which included Japanese Wikipedia administrators constantly removed edits regarding the incident, before finally protecting the article so that nobody else could edit it. When brought up on the article's talk page, they cited this as being "the result of discussion by the community". Though the topic has been brought up multiple times since, with many topics on the talk page questioning the decision, all such attempts at discussion were answered with the same users saying that the topic was already discussed and decided upon by "the community". The problems with the Wikipedia article were widely discussed on social media, and subsequently reported on by multiple outlets in the Japanese news media,<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-10-08|title=【池袋暴走事故】飯塚幸三被告が大炎上！ ウィキペディア編集不可能で「賞賛」のみ掲載 / 事故詳細には名前記載せず {{!}} バズプラスニュース|url=https://buzz-plus.com/article/2020/10/08/kozo-iizuka-wikipedia-news/|access-date=2021-03-25|website=バズプラスニュース {{!}} ラーメン二郎、話題の芸能、ホットな記事が満載です！|language=ja}}</ref> including major outlets such as [[Asahi Shimbun]], which questioned the decision of the Wikipedia users.<ref name="ウィキペディアで加筆と削除の応酬　池袋暴走事故めぐり">[https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASN9S5TNWN9JUTIL03F.html ウィキペディアで加筆と削除の応酬　池袋暴走事故めぐり] 2020-09-25 [[Asahi Shimbun]]</ref>
Attention was brought to the Japanese Wikipedia article about [[Kozo Iizuka]] ([[:ja:飯塚幸三]]), which describes his accomplishments in detail, but makes no mention of how he killed a woman and her young daughter in the [[Higashi-Ikebukuro runaway car accident]] that made him a household name in Japan. A small group of users which included Japanese Wikipedia administrators constantly removed edits regarding the incident, before finally protecting the article so that nobody else could edit it. When brought up on the article's talk page, they cited this as being "the result of discussion by the community". Though the topic has been brought up multiple times since, with many topics on the talk page questioning the decision, all such attempts at discussion were answered with the same users saying that the topic was already discussed and decided upon by "the community". The problems with the Wikipedia article were widely discussed on social media, and subsequently reported on by multiple outlets in the Japanese news media,<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-10-08|title=【池袋暴走事故】飯塚幸三被告が大炎上！ ウィキペディア編集不可能で「賞賛」のみ掲載 / 事故詳細には名前記載せず {{!}} バズプラスニュース|url=https://buzz-plus.com/article/2020/10/08/kozo-iizuka-wikipedia-news/|access-date=2021-03-25|website=バズプラスニュース {{!}} ラーメン二郎、話題の芸能、ホットな記事が満載です！|language=ja}}</ref> including major outlets such as [[Asahi Shimbun]], which questioned the decision of the Wikipedia users.<ref name="ウィキペディアで加筆と削除の応酬　池袋暴走事故めぐり">[https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASN9S5TNWN9JUTIL03F.html ウィキペディアで加筆と削除の応酬　池袋暴走事故めぐり] 2020-09-25 [[Asahi Shimbun]]</ref>

In 2021, it came to light that the Japanese Wikipedia is engaging in [[Historical revisionism (negationism)|historical revisionism]] and [[Whitewashing (censorship)|whitewashing]] on a number of articles, especially the Japanese Wikipedia article for the [[Battle of Hong Kong]] ([[:ja:香港の戦い]]), the Japanese Wikipedia article for [[Comfort women]] ([[:ja:日本の慰安婦]]), the Japanese Wikipedia article for the [[Nanjing Massacre]] ([[:ja:南京事件]]) and the Japanese Wikipedia article for [[Unit 731]] ([[:ja:731部隊]]).<ref name="YumikoSatoSlate">{{Cite web| url=https://slate.com/technology/2021/03/japanese-wikipedia-misinformation-non-english-editions.html| title=Non-English Editions of Wikipedia Have a Misinformation Problem| last=Sato| first=Yumiko| publisher=The Slate Group| date=2021-03-19| website=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]| access-date=2021-08-23}}</ref><ref name="YumikoSatoJournal">{{Cite web| url= https://yumikosato.com/2021/01/09/japanese-wikipedia/ | title=日本語版ウィキペディアで「歴史修正主義」が広がる理由と解決策| last=Sato| first=Yumiko| publisher=WordPress | date=2021-01-09| website=Yumiko Sato’s Music Therapy Journal| access-date=2021-08-23| language=Japanese| trans-title=Reasons Why “Historical Revisionism” Is Widespread on Japanese Wikipedia and Solutions for It}}</ref>

According to Yumiko Sato, the Japanese writer, the instances of historical revisionism and whitewashing are as follows:
* The English Wikipedia article for “Battle of Hong Kong” has a section titled “Massacres and other war crimes” which lists at least 10 instances of massacres and/or war crimes that took place in this battle. In contrast to this, the Japanese Wikipedia article makes no mention of these massacres and/or war crimes.<ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />
* The English Wikipedia article for “Comfort women” makes it clear that these women and girls were sex slaves. In contrast to this, the Japanese Wikipedia article uses the word 売春 ("prostitution") to describe them, in order to imply that these women and girls were not forced into it. Moreover, the article uses the words 売春 ("prostitution"), レイプ ("rape") and 慰安婦 ("comfort woman") without distinguishing them, in order to cover up the problem. Nationalists, such as former Prime Minister Abe, claim that there was no evidence that comfort women were coerced, and the article suspiciously lines up with their claim.<ref name="YumikoSatoSlate" /><ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />
* The English Wikipedia article for “Nanjing Massacre” has an Infobox listing off the highlights such as the date, location, number of people killed and so on. It also has many photos showing the victims and the carnage. In contrast to this, the Japanese Wikipedia article is titled 南京事件 ("Nanjing Incident"), which is the same name as the Nanjing Incident of 1927. It also does not have an Infobox listing off the highlights. Furthermore, it only shows a few photos of places that were not directly related to the massacre.<ref name="YumikoSatoSlate" /><ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />
* The English Wikipedia article for “Unit 731” covers the aspects of this topic thoroughly. In contrast to this, the Japanese Wikipedia article had a section containing the testimonies of perpetrators and victims, but in 2020, that section was replaced with a small subsection claiming that there is a theory that human experimentation took place.<ref name="YumikoSatoSlate" /><ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />

According to Yumiko Sato, the reasons for the widespread historical revision and whitewashing on the Japanese Wikipedia are as follows:
* English is the official language of 67 countries around the world. There are about 1.5 billion English speakers in the world. These English speakers (who are the editors and administrators of the English Wikipedia) have a variety of nationalities, races, cultures and backgrounds. In contrast to this, Japanese is the official language of Japan. Most of the editors and administrators of the Japanese Wikipedia are Japanese, so the Japanese Wikipedia does not have the same level of diversity that the English Wikipedia has. The Japanese Wikipedia is also more isolated than the English Wikipedia. This isolation, combined with the low level of diversity, makes it more likely for articles in the Japanese Wikipedia to be biased.<ref name="YumikoSatoSlate" /><ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />
* Wikipedia is based on the values of the Enlightenment, such as freedom of speech, using reason to arrive at the truth and freely discussing societal issues in the public sphere. Wikipedia qualifies as a “public sphere”, in which people freely express their own opinions to each other and hold debates. However, Japan does not have the value of “freely discussing societal issues in public places”. In other words, it is very rare for Japanese people to use their real names and have open discussions.<ref name="YumikoSatoSlate" /><ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />
* Over 40% of editors on the Japanese Wikipedia are anonymous and unregistered users, which is much higher than the number of anonymous and unregistered users on other versions of Wikipedia.<ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />
* On Wikipedia, it is common for editors to rewrite each other’s edits when they disagree with the contents, and this is called an “edit war”. While edit wars happen on any version of Wikipedia, the Japanese Wikipedia frowns on edit wars so much that its administrators will lock articles after only a few edits. As a matter of fact, the Japanese Wikipedia has more locked pages than any other version. Edit wars are an example of “using reason to arrive at the truth”, but the Japanese Wikipedia does not necessarily practice this value.<ref name="YumikoSatoSlate" /><ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />

Yumiko Sato recommends the following courses of actions:
* Make users register if they want to edit on Wikipedia.<ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />
* Provide oversight such as training the administrators.<ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />
* Increase collaboration between languages.<ref name="YumikoSatoJournal" />

On July 19, 2021, About the resignation of [[Cornelius (musician)|Keigo Oyamada as Cornelius]], the composer of the [[2020 Summer Olympics|2020 Tokyo Olympic games]] opening ceremony after it emerged that he had bullied classmates with disabilities when he was a student,<ref>"[https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-57891364 Tokyo Olympics: Composer Keigo Oyamada resigns over bullying at school]", the BBC NEWS, 19 July, 2021.</ref> {{ill|the FLASH, Japanese weekly gossip magasize|ja|FLASH (写真週刊誌)}}, criticized Japanese Wikipedia because which repeatedly removed the edtion which had wrote the fact of Bullying by Oyamada, which had already reported in the 1990s in another magazine's interview report and well known among netizens. "If Wikipedia had mentioned the facts of Oyamada's bullying, he may not have been appointed from the beginning.".<ref>「[https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/0155bf6097e2f1f27b9977f135ed621b85e61cde 小山田圭吾、海外からも批判されて辞任…なぜウィキに「いじめ問題」は記載されてなかった？]」''FLASH''、July 19, 2021 21:34</ref>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 13:03, 21 September 2021

Favicon of Wikipedia Japanese Wikipedia
Screenshot
The Main Page of the Japanese Wikipedia on 3 April 2021.
Main Page of the Japanese Wikipedia in April 2021
Type of site
Online encyclopedia
Available inJapanese
OwnerWikimedia Foundation
URLja.wikipedia.org
CommercialNo
RegistrationOptional
LaunchedMay 11, 2001; 23 years ago (2001-05-11)

The Japanese Wikipedia (ウィキペディア日本語版, Wikipedia Nihongo-ban, literally "Wikipedia: Japanese-language version") is the Japanese-language edition of Wikipedia, a free, open-source online encyclopedia. Started on 11 May 2001,[1] the edition attained the 200,000 article mark in April 2006 and the 500,000 article mark in June 2008. As of December 2024, it has over 1,440,000 articles with 12,343 active contributors, ranking fourth behind the English, Spanish and Russian editions.[2]

As of June 2020, it is the world's most visited language Wikipedia after the English Wikipedia.[3]

History

In March 2001, three non-English editions of Wikipedia were created, namely, the German, Catalan and Japanese Wikipedias.[4] The original site address of the Japanese Wikipedia was http://nihongo.wikipedia.com and all pages were written in the Latin alphabet or romaji, as the software did not work with Japanese characters at the time. The home page also showed an early attempt at creating a vertical text.[5]

The first article was named "Nihongo no Funimekusu" (meaning "Phonemics of the Japanese language"). Until late December in that year, there were only two articles.

Expansion

On January 31, 2003, a Japanese online magazine, Wired News Japanese edition, covered Wikipedia. After that, the number of participants started to increase considerably and many pages about the Wikipedia project were translated or created.

On February 12, 2003, the Japanese edition of Wikipedia reached the 1,000-page milestone, two years after the English edition. Given that accomplishment, Slashdot Japan posted a story about the Japanese Wikipedia. Several days after that, the number of participants doubled, attesting to the power of the Slashdot effect. Because of this exposure, a variety of articles started to appear, among them physics, biology, information technology, literature, music, games, manga, and celebrities.

On July 15, 2003 the Japanese Wikipedia reached 10,000 articles, four months and three days after the 1,000-article milestone, beating the time it took the English Wikipedia to achieve the same feat. By early 2004 the Japanese Wikipedia contained 30,000 articles. The increase in both articles and contributors was steady after that, and by late September it had reached 75,000 articles.

The major force behind the expansion appeared to be a number of links at Yahoo! Japan News. It is unknown exactly when Yahoo! started to put links to the edition in their articles, but as of August 2004, dozens of news articles posted on Yahoo! Japan contained links to the edition to explain terms in the articles.[citation needed]

Awards

In September 2004, the Japanese Wikipedia was awarded the "2004 Web Creation Award Web-Person Special Prize"[6] from the Japan Advertisers Association.[7] This award, normally given to individuals for great contributions to the Web in Japanese, was accepted by a long-standing contributor on behalf of the project.

Characteristics

Origin of viewers on the Japanese Wikipedia.

The Japanese Wikipedia is different from the English Wikipedia in a number of ways.

Editing

  • An edit is kept only if it is legal under both Japanese and United States laws, to account for the fact that the vast majority of contributors live in Japan. This has two major consequences:
    • The fair use provisions of US law are not considered to be applicable. Articles and media files which do not have a GFDL-compatible license are prohibited, even if they would be legal under the "fair use" doctrine in the US.
    • Materials considered illegal cannot be kept in the archive, even reverted by oneself but caught in history archive. If an illegal edit is inserted between valid versions, a SysOp may remove specific revisions by deleting the article temporarily and restoring valid revisions.[8]
  • Quotation is discouraged. There is controversy over the GFDL compatibility of quotations. Articles that contain quotations will be deleted unless they meet all the following legal requirements:
    1. The source is clearly referred to.
    2. The quotation is necessary.
    3. The quoting and quoted works can respectively be regarded as the principal and subordinate both in quantity and quality.
    4. The quoting and quoted works are clearly distinguishable.[citation needed]
  • Cut-and-paste moves within Wikipedias, including merging, splitting, and translation from another language are not allowed unless the original article source and date is explicitly referred to in the edit summary, because such moves are considered to be GFDL violations.[9] Articles created in such a manner will be deleted. A comparable policy is in place on the English Wikipedia, but it is only casually enforced.
The Japanese Wikipedia has the most anonymous contributions as compared to other major languages in Wikipedia.[10] The image is as of December 2007.

Community

  • IP users' contributions are high compared to other major language versions of Wikipedia (see graph).
  • The Japanese Wikipedia has the lowest number of administrators per active users (only 0.32%).[11]
  • Edit wars are strongly frowned upon. Articles may be protected as a result of an edit war with as little as three or four edits. Protected pages will not be unprotected unless someone explicitly requests it. Perhaps because of this, as of September 2005 the Japanese Wikipedia had the second-highest number of articles protected for over two weeks, after the German Wikipedia.[12] In May 2008, 0.0906% of articles were fully protected (only editable by admins), which was by far the highest percentage among the ten largest Wikipedias.[13] Articles on sensitive topics, such as Japanese war crimes and current territorial disputes, are almost always under lengthy protection.
  • On April 18, 2010 there was a proposal to create a new namespace specifically for WikiProjects to shorten the name of a WikiProject. This proposal finally passed and a new namespace named "プロジェクト:" (Project:) was created for WikiProjects on September 20 the same year (UTC).[14]
  • The edition stresses the fact that it is not a news bulletin, and discourages edits on current events.[15]
  • In keeping with the strong aversion to edit wars, the administrators react negatively to cases where many minor edits are made to a single article in a short period of time.[16]
  • The Japanese Wikipedia is Japan-centered, due to the fact that the majority of users are Japanese people. When referring to places outside Japan they are often called "overseas", and references to Japanese perspective on articles are common. They are trying to discourage this tendency.[17]

Policies

  • Articles will be deleted if they contain the names of private citizens, unless they are public figures. An article about Shosei Koda, a Japanese citizen kidnapped in Iraq, does not refer to him by name,[18] but former Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda's name may be mentioned due to his public position. Convicted criminals and their victims are considered private citizens, even if the case was extensively covered in Japanese media, and their names may not be published until their death.[19]
  • The Japanese edition of the English policy Ignore All Rules (directly linked to one of Five Pillars) is neither a policy nor a guideline.
  • The Japanese edition of the English Wikipedia how-to guide How to write a plot summary is a formal guideline.
  • The Japanese edition of the English Wikipedia page Handling trivia (which is an explanatory supplement to the Manual of Style guideline on trivia sections) is a formal guideline as well.
  • The Japanese edition of the English banning policy is not a policy, for lack of the Arbitration Committee.
  • Toukou Burokku Irai (Blocking requests), which has no corresponding rules in English Wikipedia, is frequently used. And often well-known users who have been active for a long time are blocked indefinitely. The blocked user may appeal for lifting the block, as in the case of blocking in English Wikipedia.
  • A closely related fact is that there is no local chapter of the Wikimedia Foundation in Japan.

Culture

Andrew Lih has written that influence from 2channel (2ch) resulted in many Japanese Wikipedia editors being unregistered and anonymous.[20] Because of the lack of registered users, Japanese Wikipedia editors as a whole interact less with the international Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation than editors of other Wikipedias do. Lih also wrote that Japanese Wikipedia users are less likely to engage in edit wars than users on Wikipedias of Western languages, and typically they would instead make alternative drafts of articles on their own userspaces.[21]

Jimmy Wales has pointed out at a conference that the Japanese Wikipedia is significantly more dominated by articles about pop culture than other Wikipedia projects, and according to one of his slides, as a New York Times journalist saw it, "barely 20 percent" of the articles on the Japanese Wikipedia were about anything else.[22] In relation to this, the Japanese Wikipedia is known to have a poor number of moderators as of early March 2010.[23]

Nobuo Ikeda, a known public policy academic and media critic in Japan, has suggested an ongoing 2channel-ization phenomenon on the Japanese Wikipedia. Ikeda argues that by allowing anonymous IP users, the community spawns a type of culture seen in the likes of anonymous message boards such as 2channel,[24] where hate speech, personal attacks and derogatory expressions are common, and also the source of entertainment.[25] He also remarks on the "emotional-outlet"/"get rid of stress" aspect of Japanese internet culture where 90% of blogs are anonymous, compared to the U.S. where 80% of blogs are expressed under one's own name. Ikeda's arguments are not the only sources hinting cultural correlation, influence, overlapping users from 2channel.[26][27]

In 2006 Kizu Naoko (木津 尚子), a Japanese Wikipedian, stated that on the Japanese Wikipedia most users start out as page editors and uploaders of images, and that the majority of people continue to serve in those roles. Some people apply to become administrators. Kizu said "Unfortunately, some apply for this role out of a desire for power! And then are surprised when they get rejected. (This is a kind of ‘regressive career path’—from an immature editor to a banned one!)"[28]

There are threads of textboard's named "【百科事典】ウィキペディア第dddd刷【Wikipedia】" (lit. "[Encyclopedia] Wikipedia Part dddd edition [Wikipedia]") related to the Japanese Wikipedia on 2channel. In these textboards, the Japanese Wikipedia community informally discuss with each other anonymously. On Twitter, they use accounts associated with their username and "#jawp" for mentioning to Japanese Wikipedia.[29]

Criticism

Attention was brought to the Japanese Wikipedia article about Kozo Iizuka (ja:飯塚幸三), which describes his accomplishments in detail, but makes no mention of how he killed a woman and her young daughter in the Higashi-Ikebukuro runaway car accident that made him a household name in Japan. A small group of users which included Japanese Wikipedia administrators constantly removed edits regarding the incident, before finally protecting the article so that nobody else could edit it. When brought up on the article's talk page, they cited this as being "the result of discussion by the community". Though the topic has been brought up multiple times since, with many topics on the talk page questioning the decision, all such attempts at discussion were answered with the same users saying that the topic was already discussed and decided upon by "the community". The problems with the Wikipedia article were widely discussed on social media, and subsequently reported on by multiple outlets in the Japanese news media,[30] including major outlets such as Asahi Shimbun, which questioned the decision of the Wikipedia users.[31]

References

  • Lih, Andrew. The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World's Greatest Encyclopedia. Hyperion, New York City. 2009. First Edition. ISBN 978-1-4013-0371-6 (alkaline paper).

Notes

  1. ^ "[Wikipedia-l] new language wikis". Retrieved 13 May 2016.
  2. ^ メインページ. Wikipedia (in Japanese). Retrieved 2009-07-08.
  3. ^ Monthly overview - ja.wikipedia.org, Wikimedia Statistics, July 11th 2020
  4. ^ From the Wayback Machine: An early English Wikipedia "HomePage" dated 2001-03-30, with links to sister projects in "Deutsch (German)", "Catalan", and "Nihongo (Japanese)".
  5. ^ An early Japanese language Wikipedia HomePage (revision #3), dated 2001-03-20 23:00, using Romanized Japanese. A subsequent version (revision #5, dated 2001-03-23 14:52) attempts at vertical text.
  6. ^ ギョーム・ブランシャー. "on the Web Advertising Bureau". Award.wab.ne.jp. Archived from the original on 2012-03-02. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  7. ^ "JAA English site". Jaa.or.jp. Archived from the original on 2012-03-02. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  8. ^ ja:Wikipedia:削除の方針
  9. ^ ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/勝興駅
  10. ^ 46% of the total contributions, compared to 31%, 28% and 19% of English, German and French editions. See Wikistats, ja, en, de, fr (May 31, 2008; English stats updated to October 2006, German February 2008).
  11. ^ "List of Wikipedias by speakers per article". Meta.wikimedia.org. 2012-02-09. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  12. ^ Erik Möller: Wikipedia page protection report Wikitech-l mailing list, Sep 14 00:39:12 UTC 2005
  13. ^ Tim 'avatar' Bartel: Entsperrung der Wikipedia WikiDE-l mailing list, 2008-05-28 07:45:55 GMT (in German)
  14. ^ ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:ウィキプロジェクト/名前空間の新設
  15. ^ ja:Wikipedia:性急な編集をしない
  16. ^ ja:Wikipedia:同じ記事への連続投稿を減らす
  17. ^ ja:Wikipedia:日本中心にならないように
  18. ^ ja:イラク日本人青年殺害事件
  19. ^ Česky. "Wikipedia:存命人物の伝記 - Wikipedia" (in Japanese). Ja.wikipedia.org. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  20. ^ Lih, p. 145.
  21. ^ Lih, p. 146.
  22. ^ Cohen, Noam (31 August 2009). "Wikipedia Looks Hard at Its Culture". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
  23. ^ 悩むウィキペディア　少ない管理人　芸能系ばかり人気. Asahi Shimbun (in Japanese). 2010-03-04. Archived from the original on March 7, 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-12.
  24. ^ "Japanese Find a Forum to Vent Most-Secret Feelings". Nytimes.com. 2004-05-09. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  25. ^ "2channel-ization of Wikipedia, Nobuo Ikeda's official blog, 2006, Japanese". Blog.goo.ne.jp. Archived from the original on 2012-04-20. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  26. ^ "About Japanese Wikipedia, Hatena Keyword, Japanese". D.hatena.ne.jp. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  27. ^ "Japanese Wikipedia is like honey bucket of Japanese internet" (in Japanese). 2009-10-22. Retrieved 2009-10-23. interview with Kazuhiko Nishi (in Japanese). J-CAST News.
  28. ^ "How and Why Wikipedia Works: An Interview with Angela Beesley, Elisabeth Bauer, and Kizu Naoko." (Archive) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wikis (WikiSym), 21-23 Aug. 2006, Odense, Denmark, ACM Press, 2006. Page 3-8. Retrieved on October 31, 2011.
  29. ^ "Wikipedia:ツール", Wikipedia (in Japanese), 2019-05-10, retrieved 2019-09-14
  30. ^ "【池袋暴走事故】飯塚幸三被告が大炎上！ ウィキペディア編集不可能で「賞賛」のみ掲載 / 事故詳細には名前記載せず | バズプラスニュース". バズプラスニュース | ラーメン二郎、話題の芸能、ホットな記事が満載です！ (in Japanese). 2020-10-08. Retrieved 2021-03-25.
  31. ^ ウィキペディアで加筆と削除の応酬　池袋暴走事故めぐり 2020-09-25 Asahi Shimbun
Japanese edition of Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Japanese_Wikipedia&oldid=1045605795"