Talk:Ceremonial magic/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
OneClickArchiver adding Tradition? |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
There are in fact numerous influence to ceremonial magic, as well as those who predate Crowley and Regardie. |
There are in fact numerous influence to ceremonial magic, as well as those who predate Crowley and Regardie. |
||
[[User:SynergeticMaggot|Zos]] 06:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:SynergeticMaggot|Zos]] 06:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
{{Clear}} |
|||
== Tradition? == |
|||
I question the wording that CM is a tradition rather than a tool or technique used within tradiitons. Thoughts?--[[User:207.224.120.39|207.224.120.39]] 01:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
:The tool you mean likely is what is described in the [[Ritual magic]] article. Ceremonial and Ritual are more or less synonymous, but 'Ceremonial magic' as a composite term is quite closely attached to the RC-GD-Thelema-etc. current rather than to "technical" aspects of magical practices. |
|||
I agree it may be useful to mark the distinction, in both articles.[[User:Denial|Denial]] 02:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC) |
|||
There is a sharp contrast between the two. Ritual magic is base and can be done with just a few items such as the wand, the cup, the dagger, books, etc. But ceremonial magic is more elaborate and "extended". There are longer rituals, and a intensely more complex than a simple ritual. Yet, there is a fine line between the two, one can lead to the other. |
|||
[[User:SynergeticMaggot|Zos]] |
|||
i want too ask is it okay if i rewrite this entire page? i literally will do a complete overhaul and explain it much more indepth. this is way too simplistic of a writing. if no one objects i will start writing it out, then submit my writing for approval. and if no one objects then can this be used instead!! ceremonial magick has far more dynamics too it than what is stated here on this page!! |
|||
Revision as of 06:01, 17 December 2021
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Ceremonial magic. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Surely several of these predate the supposed inspirations?
Surely several of these predate the supposed inspirations?
Or that there are many influential people who predate Israel Regardie and Aleister Crowley. Khiradtalk
There are in fact numerous influence to ceremonial magic, as well as those who predate Crowley and Regardie. Zos 06:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Tradition?
I question the wording that CM is a tradition rather than a tool or technique used within tradiitons. Thoughts?--207.224.120.39 01:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- The tool you mean likely is what is described in the Ritual magic article. Ceremonial and Ritual are more or less synonymous, but 'Ceremonial magic' as a composite term is quite closely attached to the RC-GD-Thelema-etc. current rather than to "technical" aspects of magical practices.
I agree it may be useful to mark the distinction, in both articles.Denial 02:02, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
There is a sharp contrast between the two. Ritual magic is base and can be done with just a few items such as the wand, the cup, the dagger, books, etc. But ceremonial magic is more elaborate and "extended". There are longer rituals, and a intensely more complex than a simple ritual. Yet, there is a fine line between the two, one can lead to the other.
Zos i want too ask is it okay if i rewrite this entire page? i literally will do a complete overhaul and explain it much more indepth. this is way too simplistic of a writing. if no one objects i will start writing it out, then submit my writing for approval. and if no one objects then can this be used instead!! ceremonial magick has far more dynamics too it than what is stated here on this page!!