Talk:Cruise ship/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:19, 16 March 2023

This is an archive of past discussions about Cruise ship. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Image accompanying "Environmental Impact"

The image next to the section on Environmental impact's title seems to suggest it is more about the seals than the ships in the background. Is the image necessary? Does it add to the section at all? It seems a bit insubstantial and does not actually convey any information. I don't think it adds anything to the article, and like I said, its actually an image of some seals. Does anyone else think it should stay?

I Bow Down Before the Gods of Wikipedia (IBDBTGOW)

Apparently, an external link to a consumer website about "cruise ship passenger rights" is A Heinous Violation of Divine Wikipedia Law (AHVODW). It is Damnable Link Spam from the Pits of Hell (DLSFTPOH). If God wanted cruise passengers to know their rights, He would speak through his One True Prophet on Earth and Internet (OTPOEAI), Wikipedia. However, a link to some lady's website about how much she LOOOOOOVES to cruise is Divinely Inspired and Immaculate Holy Writ (DIAIHW).

Mere mortal that I am, I cannot hope to understand such wisdom. I Now Wet Myself in Submissive Humility (INWMISH).

For the intellectually impaired and for Wikipedia meta-editors (but I repeat myself), I will now translate the above sarcasm into literal English using No Big Words (NBW): Have I seen the limits of your stupidity, or is there more? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.233.20 (talk) 17:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

The problem is not with the information, but the site. It appears to be an exact copy of the Coast Guard information page. The USGS site should be linked (done), not a commercial site which mirrors it. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 17:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Image accompanying "Environmental Impact"==
 The image next to the section on Environmental impact's title seems to suggest it is more about the seals than the ships in the background. Is the image necessary? Does it add to the section at all? It seems a bit insubstantial and does not actually convey any information. I don't think it adds anything to the article, and like I said, its actually an image of some seals. Does anyone else think it should stay?
+{{Clear}}
+==I Bow Down Before the Gods of Wikipedia (IBDBTGOW)==
+Apparently, an external link to a consumer website about "cruise ship passenger rights" is A Heinous Violation of Divine Wikipedia Law (AHVODW). It is Damnable Link Spam from the Pits of Hell (DLSFTPOH). If God wanted cruise passengers to know their rights, He would speak through his One True Prophet on Earth and Internet (OTPOEAI), Wikipedia.  However, a link to some lady's website about how much she LOOOOOOVES to cruise is Divinely Inspired and Immaculate Holy Writ (DIAIHW).
+Mere mortal that I am, I cannot hope to understand such wisdom. I Now Wet Myself in Submissive Humility (INWMISH).
+For the intellectually impaired and for Wikipedia meta-editors (but I repeat myself), I will now translate the above sarcasm into literal English using No Big Words (NBW):  Have I seen the limits of your stupidity, or is there more? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.127.233.20|70.127.233.20]] ([[User talk:70.127.233.20|talk]]) 17:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+:The problem is not with the information, but the site.  It appears to be an exact copy of the Coast Guard [http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/cruiseship.htm information page].  The USGS site should be linked (''done''), not a commercial site which mirrors it.  Regards,  [[User:Kablammo|Kablammo]] ([[User talk:Kablammo|talk]]) 17:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)