Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Requests to revert undiscussed moves: done 1. song article moved, village discussion opened.
Line 23: Line 23:
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | page title to revert to | reason = reason for move}}
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | page title to revert to | reason = reason for move}}
and enter on a new line; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no -->
and enter on a new line; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no -->

* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Punani (6ix9ine song) | 2 = Punani | discuss = no | reason = revert recent undiscussed move | sig = [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 06:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC) | requester = Station1}}
*:@[[User:Station1|Station1]] actually, I think the undiscussed moved is fine. Punani is a [[:wikt:punani|slang]] for female reproductive system and should instead be redirected to [[female reproductive system]] as such. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 07:14, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
**<del>'''Concur'''</del> <ins>'''Oppose''' revert</ins>: In viewing the page history of the redirect [[Punani]], it's been linked to [[Punani (6ix9ine song)]], and [[Punanai]] though the redirect [[Punani (Sri Lanka)]]; currently the former. The slang term [[User:Robertsky|Robertsky]] mentions, hasn't come up yet. It sounds like what's needed is a disambiguation page. I'm going to go ahead and apply a hatnote to the top of each article. &#8212;&#160;[[User:CJDOS|CJDOS,&#160;Sheridan,&#160;OR]]&#160;([[User talk:CJDOS|talk]]) 07:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC) (revised 07:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC))
**:@[[User:CJDOS|CJDOS]] indeed. I had another look at the page history, and thus converting to dab page now. I have updated wikilinks for the song pages to the current title instead. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 07:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
**::'''Question:''' Should we consider moving the disambiguation page to [[Punani (disambiguation)]], or leave it at [[Punani]]? &#8212;&#160;[[User:CJDOS|CJDOS,&#160;Sheridan,&#160;OR]]&#160;([[User talk:CJDOS|talk]]) 07:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
*Dab page at base. With the Sri Lanka town at correct spelling [[Punani (Sri Lanka)]], no matter how funny smutty the Railway Station platform sign reads to some people. Certainly the 107-charting song must be moved. [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 15:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
*Dabpage at main title, and move song article to [[Punani (song)]], per [[WP:SONGDAB]]. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 15:38, 22 March 2023 (UTC)


==== Contested technical requests ====
==== Contested technical requests ====

Revision as of 16:26, 22 March 2023

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

  • Cristidiscoidea  Nucleariid (currently a redirect instead to Nucleariida) (move · discuss) – The group of organisms known as "nucleariids" (singular "nucleariid") has received many formal names: first Rotosphaerida, then Nucleariidae/Nucleariida/Nucleariae, then Cristidiscoidea. However, they're all the same, and I believe giving priority to the informal name Nucleariid would relieve us from having to choose one formal taxon name over the other. (Also, I noticed that Nucleariida is also a separate page, and the information there will need to be transferred into Nucleariid just like what happened between Stramenopiles and Heterokont) ☽ Snoteleks13:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From both articles, it looks like Nucleariida is one of two orders in the class Cristidicoidea. Merging the two would mean that the other order does not exist. This doesn't seem right to me. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

Administrator needed