Talk:1000M: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:14, 23 March 2024

1000M is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) at 15:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Short description: Apartment complex in the Michigan District of Michigan Avenue in Chicago

1000M was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 23, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

A fact from 1000M appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Chicago's 1000 South Michigan is a supertall skyscraper planned to rise to over 1,000 feet (300 m), even though it is in a historic district zoned for buildings up to 425 feet (130 m)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1000 South Michigan.

Wikipedia

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

1000M LuxuryCondos Kara-Mann-Discusses-Her-Plans-for-Chicago's-Newest-Luxury-Residence ExtRendering.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Quickfailed. – Teratix ₵ 14:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1000M/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Teratix (talk · contribs) 14:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am quickfailing this article per GACFAIL (3), article "has, or needs, cleanup banners". (Alternatively, it could be said the article is a long way from meeting GAC (2), "verifiable" or GAC (4), "represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias").

The article contains a large unsourced section ("Amenities") written in a promotional tone, which would justify applying cleanup banners for lacking sources and/or advertising. Although this section was written by another editor, it appeared in the version at the time of nomination. I initially thought it was just an unlucky case of last-minute vandalism, but as it turns out, it had been present in the article for over a month at the time. (Paragraph added 21 February, minor revision the next minute, nominated 18 March with no interceding revisions) Given it would obviously be absurd for such an experienced editor not to read the article he was nominating for GA, I can only presume you must have endorsed this additional section. – Teratix ₵ 14:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{GA nominee|15:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]] / [[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]] / [[WP:FOUR]] / [[WP:CHICAGO]] / [[WP:WAWARD]])</small>|page=2|subtopic=Art and architecture|status=|note=|shortdesc=Apartment complex in the Michigan District of Michigan Avenue in Chicago}}
 {{FailedGA|14:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)|topic=Art and architecture|page=1|oldid=1214929540}}
 {{dyktalk|11 December|2015|entry= ... that [[Chicago]]'s '''[[1000 South Michigan]]''' is a supertall skyscraper planned to rise to over {{convert|1000|ft}}, even though it is in [[Historic Michigan Boulevard District|a historic district]] zoned for buildings up to {{convert|425|ft}}?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/1000 South Michigan}}