Corporate Memphis: Difference between revisions
m Reverted 1 edit by 23.241.114.84 (talk) to last revision by 2600:8807:5040:B340:8159:2B18:B9C6:42F3 |
Do not revert my edit. This is a constructive edit with source. Global homogenization is used widely on the internet, see reddit community for example: https://www.reddit.com/r/GlobohomoArt/ Undid revision 1223127633 by ThaesOfereode (talk) Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:Humaaans-sitting-1.svg|thumb|Illustration in Corporate Memphis style from ''humaaans'' design library]] |
[[File:Humaaans-sitting-1.svg|thumb|Illustration in Corporate Memphis style from ''humaaans'' design library]] |
||
'''Corporate Memphis''' (alternative names: '''Alegria art''', '''big tech art''', '''flat art''', or '''corporate artstyle'''<ref name="gg">{{cite web |last1=McGinn |first1=Julian |title=It's Not Just You: Why People Hate "Corporate Art Style" |url=https://www.thegrandgeekgathering.com/its-not-just-you-why-people-hate-corporate-art-style/ |website=The Grand Geek Gathering |date=30 March 2022 |access-date=8 January 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240108075806/https://www.thegrandgeekgathering.com/its-not-just-you-why-people-hate-corporate-art-style/|archive-date=8 January 2024}}</ref>) is an [[Style (visual arts)|art style]] named after the [[Memphis Group]] that features [[Flat design|flat areas of color]] and geometric elements. Widely associated with [[Big Tech]] illustrations in the late 2010s<ref name=":1" /> and early 2020s,<ref name=":2">{{Cite magazine |last=Gabert-Doyon |first=Josh |date=2021-01-24 |title=Why does every advert look the same? Blame Corporate Memphis |url=https://www.wired.co.uk/article/corporate-memphis-design-tech |magazine=Wired UK |language=en-GB |issn=1357-0978 |access-date=2021-02-10 |archive-date=2021-08-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210822144506/https://www.wired.co.uk/article/corporate-memphis-design-tech |url-status=live }}</ref> it has been met with a polarized response, with criticism focusing on its use in sanitizing corporate communication,<ref name=":1" /> as well as being seen as visually offensive, insincere, pandering and over-saturated,<ref name="gg" /> though some illustrators have defended the style, pointing at what they claim to be its art-historical legitimacy.<ref name=":3">{{cite magazine |last=Frey |first=Angelica |date=10 January 2022 |title=Facebook made a certain type of illustration ubiquitous—but it's time to stop knocking it |url=https://www.fastcompany.com/90711508/facebook-made-a-certain-type-of-illustration-ubiquitous-but-its-time-to-stop-knocking-it |magazine=Fast Company |access-date=18 December 2022 |archive-date=19 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221219062732/https://www.fastcompany.com/90711508/facebook-made-a-certain-type-of-illustration-ubiquitous-but-its-time-to-stop-knocking-it |url-status=live }}</ref> |
'''Corporate Memphis''' (alternative names: '''Globol homogenization or Globohomo'''<ref>{{Cite web |title =The rise of the “Globohomo” art style |url=https://www.hov.co/blog/post/the-rise-of-the-globohomo-art-style}}</ref>, '''Alegria art''', '''big tech art''', '''flat art''', or '''corporate artstyle'''<ref name="gg">{{cite web |last1=McGinn |first1=Julian |title=It's Not Just You: Why People Hate "Corporate Art Style" |url=https://www.thegrandgeekgathering.com/its-not-just-you-why-people-hate-corporate-art-style/ |website=The Grand Geek Gathering |date=30 March 2022 |access-date=8 January 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240108075806/https://www.thegrandgeekgathering.com/its-not-just-you-why-people-hate-corporate-art-style/|archive-date=8 January 2024}}</ref>) is an [[Style (visual arts)|art style]] named after the [[Memphis Group]] that features [[Flat design|flat areas of color]] and geometric elements. Widely associated with [[Big Tech]] illustrations in the late 2010s<ref name=":1" /> and early 2020s,<ref name=":2">{{Cite magazine |last=Gabert-Doyon |first=Josh |date=2021-01-24 |title=Why does every advert look the same? Blame Corporate Memphis |url=https://www.wired.co.uk/article/corporate-memphis-design-tech |magazine=Wired UK |language=en-GB |issn=1357-0978 |access-date=2021-02-10 |archive-date=2021-08-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210822144506/https://www.wired.co.uk/article/corporate-memphis-design-tech |url-status=live }}</ref> it has been met with a polarized response, with criticism focusing on its use in sanitizing corporate communication,<ref name=":1" /> as well as being seen as visually offensive, insincere, pandering and over-saturated,<ref name="gg" /> though some illustrators have defended the style, pointing at what they claim to be its art-historical legitimacy.<ref name=":3">{{cite magazine |last=Frey |first=Angelica |date=10 January 2022 |title=Facebook made a certain type of illustration ubiquitous—but it's time to stop knocking it |url=https://www.fastcompany.com/90711508/facebook-made-a-certain-type-of-illustration-ubiquitous-but-its-time-to-stop-knocking-it |magazine=Fast Company |access-date=18 December 2022 |archive-date=19 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221219062732/https://www.fastcompany.com/90711508/facebook-made-a-certain-type-of-illustration-ubiquitous-but-its-time-to-stop-knocking-it |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
== Origins == |
== Origins == |
Revision as of 02:10, 10 May 2024
Corporate Memphis (alternative names: Globol homogenization or Globohomo[1], Alegria art, big tech art, flat art, or corporate artstyle[2]) is an art style named after the Memphis Group that features flat areas of color and geometric elements. Widely associated with Big Tech illustrations in the late 2010s[3] and early 2020s,[4] it has been met with a polarized response, with criticism focusing on its use in sanitizing corporate communication,[3] as well as being seen as visually offensive, insincere, pandering and over-saturated,[2] though some illustrators have defended the style, pointing at what they claim to be its art-historical legitimacy.[5]
Origins
Flat art developed out of the rise of vector graphic programs, and a nostalgia for mid-century modern illustration.[5] It began to trend in editorial illustration and especially the tech industry, which relied on simple, scalable illustrations to fill white space and add character to apps and web pages.[3] The style was widely popularized when Facebook introduced Alegria, an illustration system commissioned from design agency Buck Studios and illustrator Xoana Herrera[3] in 2017.[6][7]
The name "Corporate Memphis" originated from the title of an Are.na board that collected early examples,[3] and is a reference to the Memphis Group, a 1980s design group known for bright colors, childish patterns, and geometric shapes.[7] The style itself was inspired by a synthesis of elements spanning the 20th-century, including the Art Deco style of the 1920s, futurism in interior design from the Atomic Age, and color and patterns from the Pop Art movement.[7]
Visual characteristics
Common motifs are flat human characters in action, with disproportionate features such as long and bendy limbs,[4] small torsos,[8] minimal or no facial features, and bright colors without any blending. Facebook's Alegria uses non-representational skin colors such as blues and purples in order to feel universal,[6] though some artists working in the style opt for more realistic skin colors and features to show diversity.[3] However, such style has overall been criticised for tokenism and feeling inauthentic.[2]
Corporate Memphis is materially quick, cheap and easy to produce, and thus appealing to companies; programs such as Adobe Illustrator can produce such designs rapidly.[2]
Reception
Once Facebook adopted the style, the sudden ubiquity of vector graphics led to a critical backlash.[5] The style has been criticized both professionally and popularly (including in myriad internet memes) for being overly minimalistic,[2] generic,[12] lazy,[4] overused, and attempting to sanitise public perception of big tech companies by presenting human interaction in utopian optimism.[3] Criticism of the art style is often rooted in larger anxieties about the creative industry under capitalism and neoliberalism.[8] Some[who?] have argued that, despite the criticism, Corporate Memphis has unexpected depth and variety, and deserves to be understood on its own merits beyond an association with tech dystopias.[5]
See also
- Material design, a Google-derived design language linked to Corporate Memphis
- Frutiger Aero, a prominent design style preceding Corporate Memphis that embraced contrasting skeuomorphism
- Flat design
- Postmodern art
- Metamodernism
- Pop art
- Capitalist realism
References
- ^ "The rise of the "Globohomo" art style".
- ^ a b c d e McGinn, Julian (30 March 2022). "It's Not Just You: Why People Hate "Corporate Art Style"". The Grand Geek Gathering. Archived from the original on 8 January 2024. Retrieved 8 January 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g Hawley, Rachel (2019-08-21). "Don't Worry, These Gangly-armed Cartoons Are Here to Protect You From Big Tech". Eye on Design. Archived from the original on 2021-08-22. Retrieved 2021-02-10.
- ^ a b c Gabert-Doyon, Josh (2021-01-24). "Why does every advert look the same? Blame Corporate Memphis". Wired UK. ISSN 1357-0978. Archived from the original on 2021-08-22. Retrieved 2021-02-10.
- ^ a b c d Frey, Angelica (10 January 2022). "Facebook made a certain type of illustration ubiquitous—but it's time to stop knocking it". Fast Company. Archived from the original on 19 December 2022. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
- ^ a b "Facebook Alegria". Archived from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 19 November 2021.
- ^ a b c "Blue people and long limbs: How one illustration style took over the corporate world | Webflow Blog". Webflow. Archived from the original on 2022-11-16. Retrieved 2022-11-16.
- ^ a b Posture, Julien (2022-01-13). "What the Think Pieces About "Corporate Memphis" Tell Us About the State of Illustration". AIGA Eye on Design. Archived from the original on 2022-05-28. Retrieved 2022-05-10.
- ^ a b Subirana, Jordi (11 April 2024). "L'Ajuntament de Barcelona s'oblida de la senyera als cartells de Sant Jordi". TOT Barcelona (in Catalan). Retrieved 6 May 2024.
- ^ Solé Ingla, Alba (12 April 2024). "Polèmica pel cartell de Sant Jordi de l'Ajuntament de Barcelona: què s'hi troba a faltar?". El Nacional (in Catalan). Retrieved 6 May 2024.
- ^ ""Sorprèn que encara mantinguin el català": crítiques al cartell de Sant Jordi de Barcelona". Vilaweb (in Catalan). 11 April 2024. Retrieved 6 May 2024.
- ^ Quito, Anne (October 26, 2019). "Why editorial illustrations look so similar these days". Quartz. Archived from the original on 2021-02-08. Retrieved 2021-02-10.