User talk:Ustadeditor2011: Difference between revisions
→June 2024: expl Tag: Reverted |
→June 2024: please do not label edits as vandalism just because you do not like them Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:what is unconstiructive about my edit. Simply dont add tags for well sourced articles, it is also vandalism. [[User:Ustadeditor2011|Ustadeditor2011]] ([[User talk:Ustadeditor2011#top|talk]]) 17:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC) |
:what is unconstiructive about my edit. Simply dont add tags for well sourced articles, it is also vandalism. [[User:Ustadeditor2011|Ustadeditor2011]] ([[User talk:Ustadeditor2011#top|talk]]) 17:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
::You removed the protection tag. Do you dispute that the article is protected, or do you dispute that protected articles should be tagged as such? You removed the [[WP:SD|short description]] for no stated reason. Do you dispute that articles should have short-descs? [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 00:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
::You removed the protection tag. Do you dispute that the article is protected, or do you dispute that protected articles should be tagged as such? You removed the [[WP:SD|short description]] for no stated reason. Do you dispute that articles should have short-descs? [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 00:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as [[WP:VAND|vandalism]], such as the edit at [[:Amaravati]], are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can [[WP:BITE|discourage editors]]. Please see [[WP:NOTVAND|what is not vandalism]] for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-notvand --><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 16:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:20, 18 June 2024
June 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed a file deletion tag from File:Hyderabad skyline Khajaguda.jpeg. When removing deletion tags, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 06:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pawan Kalyan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You removed the protection tag, but the article is indeed protected. You also removed the short description for no stated reason. DMacks (talk) 13:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- what is unconstiructive about my edit. Simply dont add tags for well sourced articles, it is also vandalism. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- You removed the protection tag. Do you dispute that the article is protected, or do you dispute that protected articles should be tagged as such? You removed the short description for no stated reason. Do you dispute that articles should have short-descs? DMacks (talk) 00:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Amaravati, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)