User talk:Cameron11598/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

DRN needs your help!

Hi there. I've noticed it's been a while since you've been active at DRN, and we could really use your help! DRN is going to undergo some changes soon, so it'd really be great if our backlog is cleared before the start of August and we have as many people on board to help with the changes (they include a move to subpages and the creation of a rotating "co-ordinator" role to help manage things day-to-day. Hope to see you soon! Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 11:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

The new face of DRN: Cameron11598

Recently the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard underwent some changes in how it operates. Part of the change involved a new list of volunteers with a bit of information about the people behind the names.

You are listed as a volunteer at DRN currently, to update your profile is simple, just click here. Thanks, Cabe6403^{(Talk•Sign)} 17:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your involvement with DRN

Hi there, I noticed that you haven't been as active at DRN as you was before. DRN has been a bit backlogged lately and we could use some extra hands. We have updated our volunteer list to a new format, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteers (your name is still there under the old format if you haven't updated it) and are looking into ways to make DRN more effective and more rewarding for volunteers (your input is appreciated!). If you don't have much time to volunteer at the moment, that's fine too, just move your name to the inactive list (you're free to add yourself back to active at any time). Hope to see you again soon :) Steven Zhang (talk) 13:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

DRN needs assistance

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

We have a backlog of cases there which need volunteer attention. If you have time available, please take one or more of these cases.

If you do not intend to take cases or help with the administration of DRN on a regular basis, or if you do not wish to receive further notices of this nature, please remove your username from the volunteer list. If you later decide to resume activities at DRN you may relist your name at that time.

Best regards, TransporterMan 15:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

Help needed at DRN

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this. via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

DRN help needed and volunteer roll call

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Crash2414

Hi there, although I agree that Crash2414 is likely a candidate for speedy deletion, I did want to draw to your attention that tagging an article within 60 seconds after creation is a bit bitey and doesn't really assume good faith. This, of course, doesn't apply to things like adverts or attack pages, but generally giving a new user 10+ minutes is a good rule of thumb. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello! To me it seemed an obvious A7/ A11 for CSD. I've been away from wikipedia for a while (3 Years gasp!) so I'm just getting back into the swing of things. My apologies. Cameron11598 (Converse) 23:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

No worries! Generally it's just suggested that you not tag pages for speedy within moments. You're absolutely right, of course, about that page. But slapping a CSD on a new page really fast like that is likely to scare off new, well-meaning contributors, rather than getting them to do things the right way. Welcome back! --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your edit at DRN

Thank you for wanting to help at DRN, but this edit was a good close for the wrong reason since no editor conduct was mentioned in that request. I've supplemented your closing and you need not do anything more there, but please take more care in reading the request in the future. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:51, 15 April 2016 (UTC) (current DRN coordinator)

???

cameron i know this isnt the relevant message but i cannot see how to reply to ur comments about my sex discussion you just said to me that i am the one confused about the purposes of the discussions page its about changes to articles ...

so .. as it is about an article describing sexual intercourse but defining it as penetration! so obviously we know why we are here and im explaining whhyyy then this article must be changed its confusing our children the definition of sex on wiki is NOT CORRECT AS I have SHOWN and YOU are telling ME that im mistaken ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkatshe (talk • contribs) 22:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for the welcome message! I appreciate it. See u around. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.152.239 (talk) 07:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Cameron11598. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 15:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Ted Cruz article

Hi there, I reverted the CSD you placed on the page, as there is currently an AfD going for the page here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Cruz is the Zodiac Killer. Since there's an open discussion, it's best to let that play out, rather than tag the page. I'd comment on the discussion that you feel it's CSD G10 worthy however. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed)

GC-1 (drug)

The page GC-1 (drug) was tagged as that already but the creator blanked it-so it is now a db-g7. Wgolf (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

@Wgolf: I actually left a message on your talk page the same time you left this. --Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 19:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Crickets

If you don't know how correcting "protozoan" to "fungus" is "constructive" then please leave my edits alone. Dziban303⁓talk 01:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@Dziban303: My apologies. However we all make mistakes. remember to WP:AGF ----Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 03:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Sajanlimbu

For removing CSD tags after a final warning, he's now listed at WP:AIV. The problem with him will be solved soon enough. --Drm310 (talk) 06:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi

The website does say CC0 Public Domain Free for commercial use No attribution required — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haroonazizi (talk • contribs) 20:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

See your talk page --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Pictures

Picture number two and three — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haroonazizi (talk • contribs) 20:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Picture number three

Picture number three thank you for your help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haroonazizi (talk • contribs) 20:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Phabricator T136509

Just a small note to let you know your task on Phabricator has been actioned and now should be able to create a new account. Peachey88 ^{(T · C)} 12:52, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks @Peachey88:! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 21:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

AFC Question

So to get my draft article reviewed, you're saying I just insert {{AFC submission}} at the top before my text starts? 7Slots (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)7Slots

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 20:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Daniel Paladini

Hi Cameron11598, I saw that you reverted my edit regarding an editor removing an entire section without cause. Was there any particular reason for your rollback of my edit? Thanks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

It was accidental I was looking at diffs while trying to file a WP:SPI on the editor you had reverted and must have hit roll back. My apologies. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 01:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok, no worries. Just want to make sure! Thanks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 05:25, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Dan Avidan

Greetings, Cameron11598. I've been attempting to expand this article by inserting sources, bolstering information, and providing much-needed organization. As you are the initial user nominating this article for deletion, could you take a look at the current state of tha article? I feel as though it has come a long way from when it was originally nominated. If not, I understand. The article can easily function as it must being either a full article or a redirect. — snoɯʎuoɥʇuɐ 17:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

@Anthonymous: I agree the article is a lot better than when it started, however there are still a lot issues that need to be addressed with the sourcing most fail WP:RS or don't really establish notability;

The following from the article definitely fail WP:RS:

• "Dan Avidan". IMDb. IMDb.com, Inc. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
• "Ninja Sex Party". ninjasexparty.com. Giggle Chick Interactive. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• "Super Mario Sunshine: Danger Pudding - PART 27 - Game Grumps". YouTube. Game Grumps. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• "Wind Waker HD: Fresh Air - PART 19 - Game Grumps". YouTube. Game Grumps. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• "Run With The Hunted". iTunes. Apple. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• "Firefly - Single". iTunes. Apple. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• "Ninja Sex Party on iTunes". iTunes. Apple. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
• Augustborn, Nicolas (9 January 2013). "Ninja Sex Party Interview". YouTube. Nicolas Augustborn.
• Nelsen, Lydia (24 May 2013). "Ninja Sex Party Interview on Lydia Wants to Know". YouTube. Third String Kicker. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• Ninja Sex Party (2016-03-08). "Eating Food in the Shower". Facebook. Retrieved April 11, 2016. On the set of our upcoming music video for the first song on our FIFTH ALBUM, "Eating Food In The Shower"!
• O'Donovan, Ross (June 25, 2013). "A Personal Message From Ross". Reddit. Reddit. Retrieved 2016-03-10.
• Jump up ^ "Dirty Shorts". YouTube. Mondo Media. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
• "DJs in PJs: Pilot". YouTube. Mondo Media. June 22, 2012. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• "Hipsters Love Coffee". YouTube. Nacho Punch. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• "World Cafe Live 2005". Myspace.com. Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• Capes Coaching (August 25, 2011). "Featured Artist In Action: Dan Avidan". Capes Coaching. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
• "Run With The Hunted". iTunes. Apple. Retrieved June 16, 2016.

The following to establish his notability but only lend to the groups to which he has belonged to

• "Ninja Sex Party - Billboard 200". Billboard.com. Billboard. Retrieved 22 August 2015.
• Comedy Charts, Billboard. "Billboard Comedy Charts". Billboard.com. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
• "Skyhill - Calendar". Sonicbids. Sonicbids, LLC. Retrieved June 16, 2016. (probably fails RS too)

This only establishes notability of his sister and notability is not inherited

• "How to shop like a fashion editor on any budget". Today (NBC News). Retrieved June 16, 2016.

The iTunes links don't really provide anything other than the songs themselves so they can't really establish notability and they kind of sorta don't meet WP:RS --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 18:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

PewDiePie

Hi, you have mistakenly accused me of "repeatedly reverting other editors' contributions". I had only reverted ONCE on the PewDiePie article within the past 24 hours. You seemed to have prematurely assumed I had committed the 3RR, which I did not. Please verify my edit history first before issuing me warnings. Also, if you are related to JacktheHarry, I could report you for Sockpuppeting. Guysayshi (talk) 02:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

 Note: The following is copied from your talk page --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 06:21, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

So I guess Assume Good Faith Doesn't apply? I don't appreciate the baseless accusations of calling me a sock, and at the same time you are also accusing JacktheHarry of being a sock master. Feel free to file a Sock Puppet Investigation it will turn up negative, I'll volunteer to let a Check User look at my account. While you only reverted once on the article, the other editor had already reverted twice. When I send a warning of edit waring, I don't just send it to one editor that is involved I place it on both of their talk pages so they are aware of the guide lines. Also 3 reverts aren't required for edit waring please review the edit warring policy and Assume Good Faith at your leisure. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 11:14 pm, Today (UTC−7)

You issued a warning to me that stated I was "repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions". Obviously I would have felt that I was wrongly accused. But, thank you for clarifying that you "don't just send it to one editor that is involved", but "place it on both of their talk pages so they are aware of the guide lines". As for the sockpuppeting, I apologize for calling you a sock. That user claimed he/she was reverting my "unproductive edits", and I thought he/she used another account to warn me from restoring my edit, which I did not. Guysayshi (talk) 06:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Doubled speedy

Sorry, we posted those at about the exact same time & I was just trying to clean them up as best as possible. Thanks for posting the username notice, saved me doing so.  :) JamesG5 (talk) 06:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

No problem I saw that and was like du-du-da-whaaaaa :p --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 06:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)