First impeachment of Donald Trump: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
→Trump–Ukraine scandal: Swap with Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump#Trump–Ukraine scandal as the Main info should be on the parent article |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
Soon after the release of the Mueller report, Trump began urging an investigation into the origins of the Russia probe, wanting to "investigate the investigators" and possibly discredit the conclusions of the [[FBI]] and Mueller.<ref name="steps" /> In April 2019, Attorney General [[William Barr]] announced that he had launched a review of the origins of the FBI's investigation,<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/13/us/politics/russia-investigation-justice-department-review.html |title=Barr Assigns U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russia Inquiry |last1=Goldman |first1=Adam |date=May 13, 2019 |newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=May 14, 2019 |last2=Savage |first2=Charlie |last3=Schmidt |first3=Michael S.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Johnson |first=Kevin |title=Attorney General taps top Connecticut federal prosecutor for review of Trump-Russia inquiry |url=https://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/05/13/attorney-general-barr-john-durham-us-attorney-connecticut-review-trump-russia-investigation-origin/1195462001/ |website=USA Today |date=May 14, 2019 |accessdate=May 17, 2019}}</ref> even though the origins of the probe were already being investigated by the Justice Department's inspector general and by U.S. attorney John Huber, who had been appointed to the same task in 2018 by then-Attorney General [[Jeff Sessions]].<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://apnews.com/75e5c4efd5c74e6e9aa1ba0237a0e651 |title=AP source: Barr launches new look at origins of Russia probe |last=Balsamo |first=Michael |date=May 14, 2019 |work=Associated Press News |accessdate=September 29, 2019}}</ref> Barr assigned U.S. Attorney [[John Durham (lawyer)|John Durham]] to lead the probe,<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Savage |first1=Charlie |last2=Goldman |first2=Adam |last3=Fandos |first3=Nicholas |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/us/politics/russia-investigation-review.html |title=Scrutiny of Russia Investigation Is Said to Be a Review, Not a Criminal Inquiry |newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 14, 2019|access-date=May 17, 2019}}</ref> and Trump directed the [[United States Intelligence Community|U.S. intelligence community]] to "promptly provide assistance and information" to Barr, and delegated to him the "full and complete authority" to declassify any related documents.<ref name="steps">{{Cite news |url=https://ktla.com/2019/05/23/trump-steps-up-calls-for-investigation-into-origin-of-russia-investigation/ |title=Trump Steps Up Calls for Investigation Into Origin of Russia Investigation |date=May 23, 2019 |work=KTLA |agency=Associated Press |accessdate=October 1, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Trump orders intel agencies to cooperate with Barr probe into 'spying' on 2016 campaign |url=https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/445347-trump-orders-intel-agencies-to-cooperate-with-barr-probe-into-spying |accessdate=October 1, 2019 |date=May 24, 2019 |work=[[The Hill (media company)|The Hill]] |first=Morgan |last=Chalfant}}</ref> Although Durham was nominally in charge of the investigation, Barr himself began contacting foreign governments to ask for information about the origins of the FBI probe. Barr personally traveled to the United Kingdom and Italy to seek information; Italy's parliament is expected to begin its own investigation into Barr's meetings with Italian secret services.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/reports-white-house-asked-uk-italy-australia-to-help-discredit-russia-probe/ |work=[[The Times of Israel]] |title=Reports: White House asked UK, Italy, Australia to help discredit Russia probe |date=October 2, 2019 |accessdate=October 2, 2019}}</ref> At Barr's request, Trump himself phoned the prime minister of Australia, [[Scott Morrison]], to ask for assistance.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.vox.com/2019/9/30/20892260/barr-australia-durham-trump-investigation |title=Trump and Barr have been urging foreign governments to help them investigate the Mueller probe's origins |last=Prokop |first=Andrew |date=September 30, 2019 |work=Vox |accessdate=October 1, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-01/donald-trump-asked-scott-morrison-for-help-mueller-report/11562604 |title=Donald Trump reportedly pressed Scott Morrison for help to discredit Mueller inquiry |first1=Connor |last1=Duffy |first2=Andrew |last2=Greene |work=Australian Broadcasting Corporation |date=October 1, 2019 |accessdate=October 4, 2019}}</ref> |
Soon after the release of the Mueller report, Trump began urging an investigation into the origins of the Russia probe, wanting to "investigate the investigators" and possibly discredit the conclusions of the [[FBI]] and Mueller.<ref name="steps" /> In April 2019, Attorney General [[William Barr]] announced that he had launched a review of the origins of the FBI's investigation,<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/13/us/politics/russia-investigation-justice-department-review.html |title=Barr Assigns U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russia Inquiry |last1=Goldman |first1=Adam |date=May 13, 2019 |newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=May 14, 2019 |last2=Savage |first2=Charlie |last3=Schmidt |first3=Michael S.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Johnson |first=Kevin |title=Attorney General taps top Connecticut federal prosecutor for review of Trump-Russia inquiry |url=https://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/05/13/attorney-general-barr-john-durham-us-attorney-connecticut-review-trump-russia-investigation-origin/1195462001/ |website=USA Today |date=May 14, 2019 |accessdate=May 17, 2019}}</ref> even though the origins of the probe were already being investigated by the Justice Department's inspector general and by U.S. attorney John Huber, who had been appointed to the same task in 2018 by then-Attorney General [[Jeff Sessions]].<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://apnews.com/75e5c4efd5c74e6e9aa1ba0237a0e651 |title=AP source: Barr launches new look at origins of Russia probe |last=Balsamo |first=Michael |date=May 14, 2019 |work=Associated Press News |accessdate=September 29, 2019}}</ref> Barr assigned U.S. Attorney [[John Durham (lawyer)|John Durham]] to lead the probe,<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Savage |first1=Charlie |last2=Goldman |first2=Adam |last3=Fandos |first3=Nicholas |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/us/politics/russia-investigation-review.html |title=Scrutiny of Russia Investigation Is Said to Be a Review, Not a Criminal Inquiry |newspaper=The New York Times |date=May 14, 2019|access-date=May 17, 2019}}</ref> and Trump directed the [[United States Intelligence Community|U.S. intelligence community]] to "promptly provide assistance and information" to Barr, and delegated to him the "full and complete authority" to declassify any related documents.<ref name="steps">{{Cite news |url=https://ktla.com/2019/05/23/trump-steps-up-calls-for-investigation-into-origin-of-russia-investigation/ |title=Trump Steps Up Calls for Investigation Into Origin of Russia Investigation |date=May 23, 2019 |work=KTLA |agency=Associated Press |accessdate=October 1, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Trump orders intel agencies to cooperate with Barr probe into 'spying' on 2016 campaign |url=https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/445347-trump-orders-intel-agencies-to-cooperate-with-barr-probe-into-spying |accessdate=October 1, 2019 |date=May 24, 2019 |work=[[The Hill (media company)|The Hill]] |first=Morgan |last=Chalfant}}</ref> Although Durham was nominally in charge of the investigation, Barr himself began contacting foreign governments to ask for information about the origins of the FBI probe. Barr personally traveled to the United Kingdom and Italy to seek information; Italy's parliament is expected to begin its own investigation into Barr's meetings with Italian secret services.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.timesofisrael.com/reports-white-house-asked-uk-italy-australia-to-help-discredit-russia-probe/ |work=[[The Times of Israel]] |title=Reports: White House asked UK, Italy, Australia to help discredit Russia probe |date=October 2, 2019 |accessdate=October 2, 2019}}</ref> At Barr's request, Trump himself phoned the prime minister of Australia, [[Scott Morrison]], to ask for assistance.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.vox.com/2019/9/30/20892260/barr-australia-durham-trump-investigation |title=Trump and Barr have been urging foreign governments to help them investigate the Mueller probe's origins |last=Prokop |first=Andrew |date=September 30, 2019 |work=Vox |accessdate=October 1, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-01/donald-trump-asked-scott-morrison-for-help-mueller-report/11562604 |title=Donald Trump reportedly pressed Scott Morrison for help to discredit Mueller inquiry |first1=Connor |last1=Duffy |first2=Andrew |last2=Greene |work=Australian Broadcasting Corporation |date=October 1, 2019 |accessdate=October 4, 2019}}</ref> |
||
===Trump–Ukraine scandal=== |
=== Trump–Ukraine scandal === |
||
{{Main|Trump–Ukraine scandal}} |
{{Main|Trump–Ukraine scandal}} |
||
==== Rudy Giuliani and his business associates ==== |
|||
In 2018, Florida businessmen [[Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman]] hired Trump's personal attorney [[Rudy Giuliani]] as a consultant in their security company, paying him $500,000. In turn, Fruman and Parnas assisted him in his search in Ukraine for damaging information about Trump's political opponents.<ref name="Parnas Fruman Trump inner circle" /><ref name="indicted oligarch Firtash">{{cite web |url=https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/10/how-an-indicted-oligarch-became-a-key-player-in-trumps-ukraine-scandal/ |title=How an indicted oligarch became a key player in Trump's Ukraine scandal |last=Friedman |first=Dan |date=October 18, 2019 |website=Mother Jones |language=en-US |url-status=live |access-date=November 2, 2019}}</ref> Giuliani sent Fruman and Parnas to Ukraine to seek information to undermine the [[Special Counsel investigation (2017–2019)|Special Counsel's investigation]] and damage [[Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign|Biden's presidential campaign]].<ref name="lev-igor">{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/10/us/politics/rudy-giuliani-ukraine-associates.html |title=Giuliani's Ukraine Team: In Search of Influence, Dirt and Money |last=Vogel |first=Kenneth P. |date=October 10, 2019 |work=The New York Times |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20191011125733/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/10/us/politics/rudy-giuliani-ukraine-associates.html |archive-date=October 11, 2019 |access-date=November 2, 2019 }}</ref> |
|||
At the same time, Fruman and Parnas were being paid by [[Dmytro Firtash]], a Ukrainian oligarch, with alleged ties to Russian organized crime and [[Moscow Kremlin|the Kremlin]], who is facing federal bribery charges in the U.S. and is fighting extradition from Austria.<ref name="indicted oligarch Firtash" />{{efn|Firtash also hired [[Joseph diGenova]] and [[Victoria Toensing]], a husband and wife team of attorneys with ties to Giuliani and Trump and who frequently appear on [[Fox News]] to promote conspiracy theories related to Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/10/03/giuliani-claims-ukraine-corruption-case-firtash-dmytro-wanted-extradition-whistleblower-impeachment-biden/ |title=Giuliani's Claims Spread to Another Ukraine Corruption Case |last=Mackinnon |first=Amy |date=October 3, 2019 |website=Foreign Policy |language=en-US |url-status=live |access-date=November 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-18/to-win-giuliani-s-help-oligarch-s-allies-pursued-biden-dirt |title=To Win Giuliani's Help, Oligarch's Allies Pursued Biden Dirt |last=Baker |first=Stephanie |last2=Reznik |first2=Irina |date=October 18, 2019 |website=Bloomberg |url-status=live |access-date=November 2, 2019}}</ref> DiGenova and Toensing met with Attorney General [[William Barr]] and other Justice Department officials in a failed attempt to convince the prosecutors to drop the charges against Firtash.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/prosecutors-flagged-possible-ties-between-ukrainian-gas-tycoon-and-giuliani-associates/2019/10/22/4ee22e7c-f020-11e9-b648-76bcf86eb67e_story.html |title=Prosecutors flagged possible ties between Ukrainian gas tycoon and Giuliani associates |last=Zapotosky |first=Matt |last2=Helderman |first2=Rosalind S. |date=October 22, 2019 |website=Washington Post |language=en-US |url-status=live |access-date=November 2, 2019 |last3=Hamburger |first3=Tom |last4=Dawsey |first4=Josh}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/01/politics/parnas-firtash-giuliani-ties/index.html |title='I'm the best-paid interpreter in the world': Indicted Giuliani associate touted windfall from Ukrainian oligarch |last=Ward |first=Vicky |last2=Cohen |first2=Marshall |date=November 1, 2019 |website=CNN |url-status=live |access-date=November 2, 2019}}</ref>}} |
|||
From at least May 2019 to August 2019, Trump and Giuliani pressed the Ukrainian government to launch an investigation that would have negatively affected Trump's political rival Joe Biden in the 2020 election. Giuliani and his associates asked Ukraine president [[Volodymyr Zelensky]] to announce an investigation into the business activities of Hunter Biden.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/29/rudy-giuliani-ukraine-biden-trump-impeachment|title=Rudy Giuliani: Ukraine sources detail attempt to construct case against Biden|last1=Pilkington|first1=Ed|last2=Roth|first2=Andrew|date=September 29, 2019|work=[[The Guardian]]|accessdate=October 6, 2019}}</ref> The pressure tactics were developed by Giuliani and [[Gordon Sondland]] and applied in part by Parnas and Fruman. Zelensky reportedly felt rattled by the pressure, according to [[Amos Hochstein]], a former diplomat and a member of Naftogaz's supervisory board, who alerted the National Security Council (NSC) of the matter in May 2019.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/politics/White-House-Told-in-May-of-Ukraine-President-Zelenskiys-Concern-About-Giuliani-Sondland-563988911.html |title=White House Told in May of Ukraine President Zelenskiy's Concern About Giuliani, Sondland |date=October 28, 2019 |website=NBC4 Washington |language=en-US |url-status=live |access-date=October 30, 2019}}</ref> Fruman and Parnas were arrested at [[Washington Dulles International Airport]] on October 9, 2019, on [[campaign finance]]-related charges brought by federal prosecutors in New York City.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/giuliani-trump-impeachment-ukraine-lobby-marie-l-yovanovitch-a9152996.html |title=Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani 'under investigation' for lobbying Ukraine |last=Schmidt |first=Michael S. |last2=Protess |first2=Ben |date=October 12, 2019 |website=The Independent |url-status=live |access-date=October 14, 2019 |last3=Vogel |first3=Kenneth P. |last4=Rashbaum |first4=William K.}}</ref><ref name="Parnas Fruman Trump inner circle">{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-two-soviet-born-emigres-made-it-into-elite-trump-circles--and-the-center-of-the-impeachment-storm/2019/10/12/9a3c03be-ec53-11e9-85c0-85a098e47b37_story.html |title=How two Soviet-born emigres made it into elite Trump circles—and the center of the impeachment storm |last=Helderman |first=Rosalind S. |date=October 12, 2019 |work=The Washington Post|access-date=October 14, 2019 |last2=Dawsey |first2=Josh |last3=Sonne |first3=Paul |last4=Hamburger |first4=Tom}}</ref> |
|||
The proposed investigation of Biden was based on a 2015 push by the U.S. to remove the Ukrainian prosecutor [[Viktor Shokin]] because he had been ignoring corruption in Ukraine and protecting political elites. At the time, this request had bipartisan support in the U.S. Congress and was also supported by the European Union.<ref>{{cite web |first=Viola |last=Gienger |first2=Ryan |last2=Goodman |url=https://www.justsecurity.org/66271/timeline-trump-giuliani-bidens-and-ukrainegate/|title=Timeline: Trump, Giuliani, Bidens, and Ukraine (updated)|date=November 27, 2019|website=Just Security|language=en-US|access-date=November 28, 2019}}</ref>{{efn|Ukraine is not a European Union member, but has [[Ukraine–European Union relations|sought to become one, a move that Russia and pro-Russia Ukrainians have sought to obstruct]].}} Joe Biden, who at the time was vice president, served as the face of this request. Ukraine fired Shokin in early 2016.<ref name="Republicans echoed Biden">{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/03/politics/gop-senators-echoed-biden-on-ukraine-reforms-kfile/index.html|title=Republican senators echoed Biden in urging Ukrainian president to reform prosecutor general's office|last1=Kaczynski|first1=Andrew|first2=Em|last2=Steck|date=October 3, 2019|website=CNN|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=November 28, 2019}}</ref> Trump claimed that Biden's true motivation was to protect his son Hunter, who served on the board of directors of the Ukrainian natural gas company [[Burisma Holdings]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-defends-conversation-with-ukraine-leader-11568993176|title=Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine President to Investigate Biden's Son|last=Cullison|first=Alan|date=September 21, 2019|access-date=September 24, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923092317/https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-defends-conversation-with-ukraine-leader-11568993176|archive-date=September 23, 2019|last2=Ballhaus|first2=Rebecca|last3=Volz|first3=Dustin|url-access=subscription|website=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-pressed-ukrainian-leader-to-investigate-bidens-son-according-to-people-familiar-with-the-matter/2019/09/20/7fa39b20-dbdc-11e9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html|title=Trump pressed Ukrainian leader to investigate Biden's son, according to people familiar with the matter|last=Zapotosky|first=Matt|date=September 20, 2019|work=The Washington Post|access-date=September 24, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190922233816/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-pressed-ukrainian-leader-to-investigate-bidens-son-according-to-people-familiar-with-the-matter/2019/09/20/7fa39b20-dbdc-11e9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html|archive-date=September 22, 2019|last2=Miller|first2=Greg|last3=Nakashima|first3=Ellen|last4=Leonnig|first4=Carol D.|author3link=Ellen Nakashima}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/us/politics/trump-whistle-blower-ukraine.html|title=Trump Pressed Ukraine's Leader on Inquiry Into Biden's Son|last=Barnes|first=Julian E.|date=September 20, 2019|work=The New York Times|access-date=September 24, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923114022/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/us/politics/trump-whistle-blower-ukraine.html|archive-date=September 23, 2019|last2=Schmidt|first2=Michael S.|last3=Vogel|first3=Kenneth P.|last4=Goldman|first4=Adam|last5=Haberman|first5=Maggie|author2link=Michael S. Schmidt|author5link=Maggie Haberman}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://apnews.com/034de586020942c8a6c1367cb8dfd39c|title=Trump, in call, urged Ukraine to investigate Biden's son|last=Lemire|first=Jonathan|date=September 21, 2019|work=Associated Press News|access-date=September 24, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190921022054/https://apnews.com/034de586020942c8a6c1367cb8dfd39c|archive-date=September 21, 2019|last2=Balsamo|first2=Michael|last3=Mascaro|first3=Lisa}}</ref><ref name="giuliani plans">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/us/politics/giuliani-ukraine-trump.html|title=Rudy Giuliani Plans Ukraine Trip to Push for Inquiries That Could Help Trump|last=Vogel|first=Kenneth P.|date=May 9, 2019|work=The New York Times|access-date=September 24, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190904134954/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/us/politics/giuliani-ukraine-trump.html|archive-date=September 4, 2019}}</ref> even though Shokin had placed his predecessor's investigation into Burisma on hold.<ref name="raymond1">{{cite news |last1=Raymond |first1=Adam K. |title=Everything We Know About the Joe Biden–Ukraine Controversy |url=https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/05/joe-biden-ukraine-controversy.html |work=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] |date=May 7, 2019 |accessdate=October 6, 2019 }}</ref><ref name="braun1">{{cite news |last1=Braun |first1=Stephen |last2=Berry |first2=Lynn |title=The story behind Biden's son, Ukraine and Trump's claims |url=https://www.apnews.com/9d4595ba4f3140c6bb6a3473a91f4a4c |agency=[[Associated Press]] |date=September 23, 2019 |accessdate=October 6, 2019 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html|title=Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump and Allies|last=Vogel|first=Kenneth P.|date=May 1, 2019|work=The New York Times|accessdate=October 6, 2019|last2=Mendel|first2=Iuliia|issn=0362-4331|author-link2=Iuliia Mendel}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/joe-biden-presidential-bid-family-business-history-democrats/|title=The Biden family's strange business history|last=Schreckinger|first=Ben|date=August 3, 2019|work=Politico|accessdate=October 2, 2019}}</ref> Despite Trump's allegations, no one has produced evidence of any criminal wrongdoing by the Bidens.<ref name="afp">{{Cite news |title=Trump: I want to meet my accuser |url=https://www.afp.com/en/news/3954/trump-i-want-meet-my-accuser-doc-1kt4vy4 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001233014/https://www.afp.com/en/news/3954/trump-i-want-meet-my-accuser-doc-1kt4vy4 |archivedate=October 1, 2019 |accessdate=October 1, 2019 |date=September 30, 2019 |work=[[Agence France-Presse]] |quote=U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday he wants and deserves to meet the anonymous whistleblower at the center of the fast-moving scandal that has triggered an impeachment probe against him{{nbsp}}... Brandishing what he said were affidavits incriminating Biden's son Hunter over his work at a Ukrainian company, Giuliani said Trump was duty bound to raise the issue with Kyiv. Trump and his allies claim Biden, as Barack Obama's vice president, pressured Kyiv to fire the country's top prosecutor to protect his son Hunter, who sat on the board of a gas company, Burisma Holdings, accused of corrupt practices. Those allegations have largely been debunked and there has been no evidence of illegal conduct or wrongdoing in Ukraine by the Bidens.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Matthias |first1=Williams |last2=Polityuk |first2=Pavel |title=Zelenskiy opponents say comments about Europeans to Trump could hurt Ukraine |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trump-whistleblower-lawmaker-idAFL5N26H3HV |accessdate=October 1, 2019 |work=[[Reuters]] |date=September 26, 2019 |quote=Trump pressed Zelenskiy to investigate the business dealings of the son of his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic front-runner to challenge Trump in an election next year. Zelenskiy agreed. Biden's son Hunter worked for a company drilling for gas in Ukraine. There has been no evidence of wrongdoing by either Biden.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Isachenkov |first1=Vladimir |title=Ukraine's prosecutor says there is no probe into Biden |url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/ukraines-prosecutor-says-there-is-no-probe-into-biden |accessdate=October 1, 2019 |work=PBS |agency=Associated Press |date=September 27, 2019 |quote=Though the timing raised concerns among anti-corruption advocates, there has been no evidence of wrongdoing by either the former vice president or his son.}}</ref><ref name="bbc">{{Cite news |title=White House 'tried to cover up details of Trump-Ukraine call' |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49842895 |accessdate=October 1, 2019 |work=[[BBC News]] |date=September 26, 2019 |quote=There is no evidence of any wrongdoing by the Bidens.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Timm |first1=Jane |title=There's no evidence for Trump's Biden-Ukraine accusations. What really happened? |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/there-s-no-evidence-trump-s-biden-ukraine-accusations-what-n1057851 |accessdate=October 1, 2019 |website=[[NBC News]] |date=September 25, 2019 |quote=But despite Trump's continued claims, there's no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of either Biden.}}</ref><ref name="Republicans echoed Biden" /> |
|||
==== Withholding of military aid and July 25 phone call ==== |
|||
{{multiple image |
{{multiple image |
||
| align = right |
| align = right |
||
Line 65: | Line 78: | ||
| caption2 = Memorandum of the call between Trump and Zelensky released by the White House on September 25, 2019 |
| caption2 = Memorandum of the call between Trump and Zelensky released by the White House on September 25, 2019 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
By July 18, 2019, Trump had—without explanation—put a hold on $391 million in congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine.<ref name="Restuccia">{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/president-trump-repeats-criticism-of-biden-in-impromptu-u-n-appearance-11569254230|title=Trump Put Hold on Military Aid Ahead of Phone Call With Ukraine's President|last=Ballhaus|first=Rebecca|date=September 24, 2019|access-date=October 2, 2019|url-status=live|last2=Restuccia|first2=Andrew|last3=Hughes|first3=Siobhan|url-access=subscription|website=[[The Wall Street Journal]]}}</ref><ref name="Reuters military aid reinstated" /> In a July 25 phone call, Trump repeatedly asked Volodymyr Zelensky to launch two investigations in cooperation with Giuliani and Attorney General Barr.<ref name="whistleblower" /><ref name="transcript" /> One proposed investigation would concern [[Conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal#CrowdStrike|a conspiracy theory]]—which originated on [[4chan]] in 2017 and was spread by blogs, social media, and [[Fox News]]<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/trump-seized-conspiracy-theory-called-insurance-policy-now-it-s-n1062096|title=Trump seized on a conspiracy theory called the 'insurance policy.' Now, it's at the center of an impeachment investigation.|last=Collins|first=Ben|date=October 3, 2019|work=NBC News|accessdate=October 4, 2019}}</ref>—that connected the American cybersecurity technology company [[CrowdStrike]] to Ukrainian actors supposedly interfering in the 2016 election.<ref>{{Cite news |title=What to know about CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity company mentioned in Trump's phone call with Zelensky |url=https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/25/crowdstrike-trump-mentions-tech-company-call-ukraines-zelensky/2446889001/ |first=Steve |last=Reilly |work=USA Today |date=September 25, 2019 |accessdate=October 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=What is CrowdStrike, the U.S. Company Trump Asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr to Look Into? |url=https://www.newsweek.com/what-crowdstrike-us-company-trump-asked-ukrainian-president-volodymyr-look-1461427 |first=Scott |last=McDonald |work=Newsweek |date=September 25, 2019 |accessdate=October 2, 2019}}</ref> Trump had been repeatedly told by his own aides that this allegation is false, but refused to accept those assurances.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/29/us/politics/tom-bossert-trump-ukraine.html |title=Trump Was Repeatedly Warned That Ukraine Conspiracy Theory Was 'Completely Debunked' |work=The New York Times |first1=Sheryl Gay |last1=Stolberg |first2=Maggie |last2=Haberman |first3=Peter |last3=Baker |date=September 30, 2019|access-date=September 30, 2019}}</ref> The other proposed investigation would concern Joe and Hunter Biden.<ref name="whistleblower" /><ref name="nytimesSept24">{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/24/us/politics/democrats-impeachment-trump.html |title=Nancy Pelosi Announces Formal Impeachment Inquiry of Trump |last=Fandos |first=Nicholas |authorlink=Nicholas Fandos |date=September 24, 2019 |work=The New York Times |issn=0362-4331 |access-date=September 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190924150010/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/24/us/politics/democrats-impeachment-trump.html|archive-date=September 24, 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="deflects and defies">{{Cite news |last1=Rucker |first1=Philip |author1link=Philip Rucker |last2=Bade |first2=Rachael |last3=Costa |first3=Robert |author3link=Robert Costa (journalist) |title=Trump deflects and defies as Democrats speed up impeachment strategy |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-deflects-and-defies-as-democrats-speed-up-impeachment-strategy/2019/09/25/d73de84a-dfc9-11e9-b199-f638bf2c340f_story.html |work=The Washington Post |date=September 25, 2019 |accessdate=September 26, 2019}}</ref> At the time of the inquiry, Joe Biden was the leading presidential candidate in [[Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries|Democratic Party primary polling]], making him Trump's most likely 2020 opponent.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Lee |first1=Jasmine C. |last2=Daniel |first2=Annie |last3=Lieberman |first3=Rebecca |last4=Migliozzi |first4=Blacki |last5=Burns |first5=Alexander |title=Which Democrats Are Leading the 2020 Presidential Race? |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/elections/democratic-polls.html |work=The New York Times |date=June 14, 2019 |accessdate=October 6, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | |||
This July 25 phone call was the subject of an anonymous complaint filed on August 12 in accordance with the [[Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act]]. In late August, Trump was notified of the whistleblower's complaint.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/witness-testimony-and-records-raise-questions-about-account-of-trumps-no-quid-pro-quo-call/2019/11/27/425545c2-0d49-11ea-8397-a955cd542d00_story.html|title=Witness testimony and records raise questions about account of Trump's 'no quid pro quo' call|last=Davis|first=Aaron C.|last2=Viebeck|first2=Elise|date=November 27, 2019|website=Washington Post|language=en|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=November 28, 2019|last3=Dawsey|first3=Josh}}</ref> Congress and the public became aware of it on September 9.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/11/us/politics/trump-ukraine-timeline.html|title=Key Dates at the Center of the Ukraine Matter|first1=Sharon|last1=LaFraniere|first2=Andrew E.|last2=Kramer|first3=Danny|last3=Hakim|date=November 11, 2019|newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |accessdate=November 19, 2019 }}</ref> Two days later, Trump lifted the hold on military aid.<ref name="Reuters military aid reinstated">{{Cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-ukraine-idUSKCN1VX213 |title=Trump administration reinstates military aid for Ukraine |last=Zengerle |first=Patricia |date=September 12, 2019 |work=Reuters |last2=Brice |first2=Makini |editor1-last=Osterman |editor1-first=Cynthia |editor2-first=Sandra |editor2-last=Maler |access-date=September 24, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190925023514/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-ukraine-idUSKCN1VX213|archive-date=September 25, 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said on September 13 that he had issued a subpoena to Acting [[Director of National Intelligence]] [[Joseph Maguire]], as Maguire had failed to release the whistleblower's complaint to the congressional intelligence committees, as was arguably required by the relevant statute. Schiff argued that the complaint might have been withheld from Congress "in an unlawful effort to protect the President and conceal from the Committee information related to his possible 'serious or flagrant' misconduct, abuse of power, or violation of law".<ref>{{Cite press release|url=https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=688|title=Chairman Schiff Issues Subpoena for Whistleblower Complaint Being Unlawfully Withheld by Acting DNI from Intelligence Committees|author=U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence|work=United States House of Representatives|date=September 13, 2019|accessdate=October 2, 2019|author-link=United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf|title=The complaint|via=house.gov|accessdate=October 6, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
On September 24, the White House released a non-verbatim memorandum of Trump's conversation with Zelensky.<ref name="transcript" />{{efn|[[Alexander Vindman]] later testified that this transcript omitted crucial words and phrases, including 'Burisma', the name of the company Hunter Biden had worked for.<ref name=corrected /><ref name="Vindmand firsthand" />}} The next day, the whistleblower complaint was released to Congress.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-whistleblower-complaint-dni-to-provide-congress-with-whistleblower-complaint-today-live-updates-2019-09-25/ |title=DNI to provide Congress with whistleblower complaint—live updates |last=Segers |first=Grace |date=September 25, 2019 |work=CBS News|url-status=live |access-date=September 25, 2019}}</ref> Trump did not mention the hold on military aid in his conversation with Zelensky, but repeatedly pointed out that the U.S. has been "very very good" to Ukraine, with which Zelensky expressed agreement. Zelensky subsequently asked about obtaining more U.S. missiles, to which Trump replied, "I would like you to do us a favor though" and requested the investigations.<ref name="favor">{{Cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-ukraine-summary-impeachment-phone-call-transcript-zelensky-a9120521.html |title='I would like you to do us a favour though': The one sentence that could bring Trump down |last=Stevenson |first=Chris |date=September 25, 2019 |work=The Independent |accessdate=October 3, 2019}}</ref> The memorandum of the conversation confirmed the whistleblower's allegations that Trump had requested investigations into the Bidens and invoked a conspiracy theory involving a Democratic National Committee server, while repeatedly urging Zelensky to work with Giuliani and Barr on these matters.<ref name=Bump27>{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/27/trump-says-whistleblower-complaint-isnt-accurate-white-house-keeps-showing-how-it-is/ |title=Trump says the whistleblower complaint isn't accurate. The White House keeps showing how it is. |last1=Bump |first1=Philip |date=September 27, 2019 |work=The Washington Post |accessdate=October 4, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20191012223748/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/27/trump-says-whistleblower-complaint-isnt-accurate-white-house-keeps-showing-how-it-is/ |archive-date=October 12, 2019 |url-access=limited }}</ref><ref name="helderman">{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mounting-evidence-buttresses-the-facts-laid-out-in-whistleblower-complaint/2019/10/05/c752843e-e6b5-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html |title=Mounting evidence buttresses the facts laid out in whistleblower complaint |last=Helderman |first=Rosalind S. |date=October 5, 2019 |work=The Washington Post |accessdate=October 5, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20191005220957/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mounting-evidence-buttresses-the-facts-laid-out-in-whistleblower-complaint/2019/10/05/c752843e-e6b5-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html |archive-date=October 5, 2019 |authorlink=Rosalind Helderman |url-access=limited }}</ref> |
|||
Democratic presidential candidate [[Elizabeth Warren|Sen. Elizabeth Warren]] described this sentence as a "smoking gun" suggesting a ''quid pro quo''.<ref name="favor" /> Prominent Democrats, including Senators [[Robert Menendez]] and [[Chris Murphy]], suggested that the hold may have been intended to implicitly or explicitly pressure the Ukrainian government to investigate Hunter Biden.<ref name="AidWithheld">{{Cite news |first=Karoun |last=Demirjian |authorlink1=Karoun Demirjian |first2=Josh |last2=Dawsey |first3=Ellen |last3=Nakashima |authorlink3=Ellen Nakashima |first4=Carol D. |last4=Leonnig |authorlink4=Carol D. Leonnig |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-ordered-hold-on-military-aid-days-before-calling-ukrainian-president-officials-say/2019/09/23/df93a6ca-de38-11e9-8dc8-498eabc129a0_story.html |title=Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=September 23, 2019 |accessdate=September 29, 2019}}</ref> Former Ukrainian presidential advisor [[Serhiy Leshchenko]] said it was made a "clear fact" that Ukraine's communication with the U.S. was dependent on discussing a future investigation into the Bidens,<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ukrainians-understood-biden-probe-condition-trump-zelenskiy-phone/story?id=65863043 |title=Biden probe was condition for Trump–Zelenskiy phone call: Ukrainian adviser |work=ABC News |first=Patrick |last=Reevell |first2=Lucien |last2=Bruggeman |date=September 25, 2019 |access-date=September 25, 2019}}</ref> while another anonymous Ukrainian lawmaker said Trump attempted to "pressure" and "[[blackmail]]" them into accepting a "''quid pro quo''" agreement based upon cooperation.<ref>{{Cite tweet |user=RichardEngel |number=1178797093684678656 |title=A former Ukrainian lawmaker deeply familiar with the Giuliani dirt-digging campaign told me Trump's phone call to the Ukrainian president asking for an investigation into the Bidens, while withholding vital military aid, was "pressure", "blackmail", and "''quid pro quo''". |last=Engel |first=Richard |date=September 30, 2019|access-date=September 30, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
==== Ukraine ==== |
|||
⚫ | |||
On September 20, 2019, Roman Truba, head of the [[National Bureau of Investigation (Ukraine)|Ukraine State Bureau of Investigations]], told left-wing American news and opinion website ''[[The Daily Beast]]'' that his agency had not investigated the Biden–Burisma connection and there were no signs of illegality there. [[Anton Herashchenko]], a senior advisor to the [[Ministry of Internal Affairs (Ukraine)|Ukraine interior minister]], told ''The Daily Beast'' that Ukraine will open such an investigation if there is an official request, along with details of why an investigation is needed and what to look for; Trump's requests had come through unofficial representatives such as Giuliani.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/20/trump-urged-ukraine-president-to-investigate-joe-bidens-son.html |title=Trump urged Ukraine president eight times during call to investigate Joe Biden's son, report says |last=Mangan |first=Dan |date=September 20, 2019 |accessdate=September 29, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190920194258/https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/20/trump-urged-ukraine-president-to-investigate-joe-bidens-son.html|archive-date=September 20, 2019 |publisher=[[CNBC]]}}</ref> |
|||
Ukrainian foreign minister [[Vadym Prystaiko]] told a Ukrainian news outlet on September 21: "I know what the [phone] conversation was about and I think there was no pressure. This conversation was long, friendly, and it touched on many questions, sometimes requiring serious answers."<ref name="ReutersMinister">{{Cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-ukraine/ukraine-minister-denies-trump-put-pressure-on-zelenskiy-during-call-report-idUSKBN1W60HU |title=Ukraine minister denies Trump put pressure on Zelenskiy during call: report |last1=Williams |first1=Matthias |date=September 21, 2019 |accessdate=September 29, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191003131325/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-ukraine/ukraine-minister-denies-trump-put-pressure-on-zelenskiy-during-call-report-idUSKBN1W60HU|archive-date=October 3, 2019 |work=[[Reuters]] |last2=Deepa |first2=Babington |last3=Russell |first3=Ros}}</ref> Prystaiko was also quoted as saying: "I want to say that we are an independent state, we have our secrets."<ref name="ReutersMinister" /> On September 22, Senator [[Chris Murphy|Murphy]] said President Zelensky told him he had no intention to get involved with an American election.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/462505-democratic-senator-ukraine-said-they-have-no-intention-to |title=Democratic senator: Ukrainian president said he has 'no intention' to interfere with U.S. election |last=Klar |first=Rebecca |date=September 22, 2019 |work=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]|access-date=September 22, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191004160337/https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/462505-democratic-senator-ukraine-said-they-have-no-intention-to|archive-date=October 4, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
In an interview released on September 24, Ukrainian diplomat and politician [[Valentyn Nalyvaichenko]] told ''The Daily Beast'' that Ukrainian authorities would be reopening corruption investigations into multiple individuals and organizations including, potentially, Burisma, Trump campaign manager [[Paul Manafort]], TV host [[Larry King]], and former prosecutor [[Yuriy Lutsenko]]. King was suspected of having received [[slush fund]] payments recorded in the "black ledger" that also named Manafort. Nalyvaichenko accused Lutsenko of having been in communication with associates of Trump "for vindictive purposes".<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/ukraine-likely-to-reopen-probe-of-hunter-biden-firm-sources |title=Ukraine Likely to Reopen Probe of Hunter Biden Firm: Sources |last=Nemtsova |first=Anna |date=September 24, 2019 |work=[[The Daily Beast]] |accessdate=September 29, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20190925021823/https://www.thedailybeast.com/ukraine-likely-to-reopen-probe-of-hunter-biden-firm-sources |archive-date=September 25, 2019 }}</ref> |
|||
Trump and Zelensky held a joint press conference at the United Nations the same day the transcript of their phone call was released. Zelensky told reporters: "We had I think good phone call. It was normal. We spoke about many things. So, I think, and you read it, that nobody pushed me."<ref name="rollingstone">{{Cite news |url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-sitting-ukraine-zelensky-united-nations-889491/ |title='No Pressure', Trump Insists, While Sitting With Ukraine's Zelensky at U.N. |last=Stuart |first=Tessa |date=September 25, 2019 |work=[[Rolling Stone]] |accessdate=September 29, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190927033744/https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-sitting-ukraine-zelensky-united-nations-889491/|archive-date=September 27, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-president-backs-trump-says-no-pressure-on-biden-probe |title=Ukraine president, in meeting with Trump, says 'nobody pushed me' to probe Biden |last=O'Reilly |first=Andrew |date=September 25, 2019 |accessdate=September 29, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191003101904/https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-president-backs-trump-says-no-pressure-on-biden-probe|archive-date=October 3, 2019 |publisher=[[Fox News]]}}</ref><ref name="CNBC Zelensky">{{Cite news |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/ukraine-president-on-trump-call-nobody-pushed-me.html |title=Ukraine's president on Trump call: 'Nobody pushed me' |last=MacDonald |first=Jordan |date=September 26, 2019|access-date=September 26, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191001191010/https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/25/ukraine-president-on-trump-call-nobody-pushed-me.html|archive-date=October 1, 2019 |publisher=[[CNBC]]}}</ref> The next day, President Zelensky said President Trump had not pressured anyone nor made any promises, and that the [[Prosecutor General of Ukraine|Prosecutor General]] [[Ruslan Riaboshapka]] would investigate all domestic cases without prejudice.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://en.hromadske.ua/posts/ukraines-zelenskyy-avoids-singling-out-biden-case |title=Ukraine's Zelenskyy Denies Singling Out "Biden Case" |last=Romanenko |first=Maria |date=September 26, 2019 |publisher=[[Hromadske.TV]] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191004031228/https://en.hromadske.ua/posts/ukraines-zelenskyy-avoids-singling-out-biden-case|archive-date=October 4, 2019|access-date=October 1, 2019}}</ref> On September 30, Zelensky made it clear that he was not going to interfere with the intra-American party confrontation.<ref name="auto1">{{Cite news |url=https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/zelensky-rebuffs-trumps-request-to-investigate-biden.html |title=Zelensky rebuffs Trump's request to investigate Biden |last=Sukhov |first=Oleg |date=September 30, 2019 |work=[[Kyiv Post]]|access-date=September 30, 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> Subsequently, at an all-day press conference on October 10, Zelensky said he had learned about the blockage of the military aid only after the July 25 phone call. "We didn't speak about this. There was no blackmail."<ref name="pbs.noblankmail">{{Cite news |url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/ukraine-president-says-there-was-no-blackmail-in-call-with-trump |first=Yuras |last=Karmanau |title=Ukraine president says there was 'no blackmail' in call with Trump |agency=Associated Press |date=October 10, 2019 |website=[[PBS]] |access-date=November 1, 2019}}</ref><ref name="kyivpost.allday">{{cite web |url=https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/zelensky-holds-6-hour-press-conference-live.html |title=Zelensky holds all-day press conference |author=<!-- Not stated --> |date=October 10, 2019 |website=Kyiv Post |access-date=November 1, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
''[[The New York Times]]'' reported on October 3 that [[Gordon Sondland]], U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, and [[Kurt Volker]], U.S. Special Envoy to Ukraine, had in August drafted a statement for Zelensky to sign that would commit Ukraine to investigate Burisma, the company that Hunter Biden worked for, as well as the conspiracy theory that Ukraine interfered with the 2016 election to benefit [[Hillary Clinton]].<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/us/politics/trump-ukraine.html |title=Trump Envoys Pushed Ukraine to Commit to Investigations |first1=Kenneth P. |last1=Vogel |first2=Michael S. |last2=Schmidt |date=October 3, 2019 |work=The New York Times |accessdate=October 6, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
On September 22, shortly after the public had become aware of the existence of a whistleblower, Trump acknowledged that he had discussed Joe Biden during a call with Zelensky on July 25. Trump said, "The conversation I had was largely congratulatory, was largely corruption, all of the corruption taking place, was largely the fact that we don't want our people like Vice President Biden and his son creating to {{sic}} the corruption already in Ukraine."<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/22/us/politics/trump-ukraine-biden.html |title=Trump Acknowledges Discussing Biden in Call With Ukrainian Leader |first=Peter |last=Baker |date=September 22, 2019 |newspaper=The New York Times|access-date=September 25, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190925051625/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/22/us/politics/trump-ukraine-biden.html|archive-date=September 25, 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> Trump denied that his hold on military aid for Ukraine was linked to the Ukrainian government's refusal to investigate the Hunter Biden controversy, while also saying that withholding aid for this reason would have been ethically acceptable if he had done it.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/23/us/politics/trump-un-biden-ukraine.html |title=Trump Said to Have Frozen Aid to Ukraine Before Call With Its Leader |last=Haberman |first=Maggie |authorlink=Maggie Haberman |date=September 23, 2019 |work=The New York Times |last2=Fandos |first2=Nicholas |author2link=Nicholas Fandos |issn=0362-4331 |last3=Crowley |first3=Michael |last4=Vogel |first4=Kenneth P. |access-date=September 25, 2019}}</ref> On September 26, 2019, Trump accused the person who provided the whistleblower with information of the call of being a "spy" and guilty of treason, before noting that treason is punishable by death.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/trump-whistle-blower-spy.html |title=Trump Attacks Whistle-Blower's Sources and Alludes to Punishment for Spies |last=Haberman |first=Maggie |authorlink=Maggie Haberman |date=September 26, 2019 |work=The New York Times |issn=0362-4331|access-date=September 26, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-suggests-whistleblower-guilty-of-treason-2019-9 |title=Trump suggested the whistleblower who filed a complaint against him is guilty of treason, which is punishable by death |last1=Sheth |first1=Sonam |last2=Panetta |first2=Grace |date=September 26, 2019 |website=Business Insider |access-date=September 26, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-09-26/trump-at-private-breakfast-who-gave-the-whistle-blower-the-information-because-thats-almost-a-spy |first=Eli |last=Stokols |title=Trump at private event: 'Who gave the whistleblower the information? Because that's close to a spy' |date=September 26, 2019 |website=[[Los Angeles Times]] |access-date=September 26, 2019}}</ref> The whistleblower's lawyers said their client feared for his or her safety.<ref name="afp" /> |
|||
Two people close to Trump told ''The New York Times'' that the behavior in the scandal was "typical" of his "dealings on the phone with world leaders", e.g. engaging in flattery, discussing cooperation, and bringing up a personal favor which then could be delegated.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/politics/trump-ukraine.html |title=Trump's Not-So-Excellent Day |last=Haberman |first=Maggie |authorlink=Maggie Haberman |date=September 25, 2019 |work=The New York Times |last2=Crowley |first2=Michael |last3=Rogers |first3=Katie |issn=0362-4331 |access-date=September 26, 2019}}</ref> In an interview, Giuliani defended Trump, calling the president's request of the Ukrainian president "perfectly appropriate", while also indicating that he himself may have made a similar request to Ukrainian officials.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Itkowitz |first=Colby |title=Giuliani admits to asking Ukraine about Joe Biden after denying it 30 seconds earlier |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/20/giuliani-admits-asking-ukraine-about-joe-biden-after-denying-it-seconds-earlier/ |work=The Washington Post |date=September 20, 2019 |accessdate=October 2, 2019}}</ref> A second whistleblower, who is also an intelligence official, came forward on October{{nbsp}}5 with "first-hand knowledge of allegations" associated with the phone call between Trump and Zelensky, according to the lawyer representing both whistleblowers.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49953225 |title=Trump impeachment: Second whistleblower emerges |date=October 7, 2019 |website=BBC News|url-status=live |accessdate=October 8, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
==== Further revelations ==== |
|||
[[File:President Trump Delivers Remarks Upon Departure October 4 2019.webm|thumb|start=02:01|left|President Trump states on October 3, 2019, that "China should start an investigation into the Bidens"<ref name=Borger />]] |
|||
On September 27, 2019, the White House confirmed an allegation by the first whistleblower that a record of the call between Trump and Zelensky was sealed in a highly classified computer system at the advice of National Security Council lawyers.<ref name="Brown27">{{Cite news |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/27/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript-white-house/index.html |title=First on CNN: White House says lawyers directed moving Ukraine transcript to highly secure system |last1=Brown |first1=Pamela |date=September 27, 2019 |accessdate=October 4, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20191012224947/https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/27/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript-white-house/index.html |archive-date=October 12, 2019 |publisher=CNN }}</ref><ref name="Miller28">{{Cite news |url=https://www.apnews.com/ec576ac2faa942d18450f7bdfac0ef24 |title=Subpoenas mark first concrete steps for Trump impeachment |last1=Miller |first1=Zeke |date=September 28, 2019 |accessdate=October 4, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20191012224337/https://www.apnews.com/ec576ac2faa942d18450f7bdfac0ef24 |archive-date=October 12, 2019 |work=Associated Press News |last2=Tucker |first2=Eric |last3=Balsamo |first3=Michael }}</ref> This came alongside media reports that the White House had used the most highly classified system to store memorandums of conversations with the leaders and officials of countries including Ukraine, [[Saudi Arabia]] and Russia. Administration officials had began storing these transcripts into this system after Trump's conversations with Australia's prime minister [[Malcolm Turnbull]] and Mexico's president [[Enrique Peña Nieto]] leaked earlier in 2017.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Salama |first1=Vivian |title=Embarrassing Leaks Led to Clampdown on Trump's Phone Records |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/embarrassing-leaks-led-to-clampdown-on-trumps-phone-records-11569710889 |accessdate=November 10, 2019 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=September 28, 2019}}</ref> This was seen by critics and the media as a deliberate attempt to hide potentially damaging information.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-whistleblower-server/a-computer-server-haunted-clinton-in-2016-now-it-may-be-trumps-turn-idUSKBN1WB2NE |first=Brad |last=Heath |title=A computer server haunted Clinton in 2016. Now it may be Trump's turn |work=Reuters |date=September 27, 2019 |accessdate=October 2, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
On October 3, after saying the U.S. has "tremendous power" and "many options" in the trade war with China "if they don't do what we want", Trump was asked by a reporter on what he hoped Zelensky would do after his phone call. Trump responded by publicly urging both Ukraine and China to investigate the Bidens.<ref name="tremendous">{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-publicly-calls-on-china-to-investigate-bidens/2019/10/03/2ae94f6a-e5f2-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html |title=Trump publicly calls on China to investigate Bidens |last1=Rucker |first1=Philip |date=October 4, 2019 |work=The Washington Post |accessdate=October 4, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20191012225550/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-publicly-calls-on-china-to-investigate-bidens/2019/10/03/2ae94f6a-e5f2-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html |archive-date=October 12, 2019 |last2=Bade |first2=Rachael |last3=Itkowitz |first3=Colby |url-access=limited }}</ref><ref name=Borger>{{Cite news |last1=Borger |first1=Julian |last2=Gambino |first2=Lauren |title=Trump calls on China to investigate Biden in extraordinary demand |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/03/trump-biden-china-investigation-demand |accessdate=October 5, 2019 |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=October 4, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191027153313/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/03/trump-biden-china-investigation-demand |archive-date=November 8, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Trump–Ukraine scandal]] revolves around efforts by U.S. president [[Donald Trump]] to coerce [[Ukraine]] and other foreign countries into providing damaging narratives about [[2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries|2020 Democratic Party presidential primary candidate]] [[Joe Biden]] as well as information relating to [[Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections]]. Trump enlisted surrogates within and outside [[Presidency of Donald Trump|his official administration]], including his personal lawyer [[Rudy Giuliani]] and Attorney General [[William Barr]], to pressure Ukraine and other foreign governments to cooperate in supporting conspiracy theories concerning American politics.<ref name="involved pence">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-involved-pence-in-efforts-to-pressure-ukraines-leader-though-aides-say-vice-president-was-unaware-of-pursuit-of-dirt-on-bidens/2019/10/02/263aa9e2-e4a7-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html|title=Trump involved Pence in efforts to pressure Ukraine's leader, though aides say vice president was unaware of pursuit of dirt on Bidens|last1=Miller|first1=Greg|date=October 2, 2019|work=[[The Washington Post]]|accessdate=October 2, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.today/20191003002753/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-involved-pence-in-efforts-to-pressure-ukraines-leader-though-aides-say-vice-president-was-unaware-of-pursuit-of-dirt-on-bidens/2019/10/02/263aa9e2-e4a7-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html|archive-date=October 3, 2019|last2=Jaffe|first2=Greg|last3=Parker|first3=Ashley|url-access=limited}}</ref><ref name="trump pressed">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/us/politics/trump-australia-barr-mueller.html|title=Trump Pressed Australian Leader to Help Barr Investigate Mueller Inquiry's Origins|last1=Mazzetti|first1=Mark|date=September 30, 2019|work=[[The New York Times]]|accessdate=October 4, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.today/20191003014641/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/30/us/politics/trump-australia-barr-mueller.html|archive-date=October 3, 2019|last2=Benner|first2=Katie|url-access=limited}}</ref><ref name="Baker">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/us/politics/trump-china-bidens.html|title=Trump Publicly Urges China to Investigate the Bidens|last=Baker|first=Peter|date=October 3, 2019|work=[[The New York Times]]|access-date=October 4, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.today/20191003161404/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/us/politics/trump-china-bidens.html|archive-date=October 3, 2019|last2=Sullivan|first2=Eileen|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331|url-access=limited}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Veronica |last=Stracqualursi |first2=Michael |last2=Warren |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/12/politics/giuliani-trump-ukraine-russia-impeachment-inquiry/index.html |title=Rudy Giuliani tells CNN he's unaware he's under investigation for Ukraine involvement |work=CNN |date=October 12, 2019 |quote=the unraveling Ukraine scandal}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Mallin |first1=Alexander |first2=Jonathan |last2=Karl |title=Barr asked Trump for introductions to Italy, Australia in Russia probe review |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/barr-asked-trump-introductions-australia-italy-review-russia/story?id=65964849 |date=September 30, 2019 |accessdate=October 20, 2019 |publisher=ABC News |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191006025016/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/barr-asked-trump-introductions-australia-italy-review-russia/story?id=65964849 |archive-date=October 6, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> Trump blocked but later released payment of a congressionally mandated $400 million military aid package to allegedly obtain ''[[quid pro quo]]'' cooperation from [[Volodymyr Zelensky]], the president of Ukraine. A number of contacts were established between the White House and the [[government of Ukraine]], culminating in a July 25, 2019, phone call between Trump and Zelensky.<ref name="involved pence"/><ref name="trump pressed" /><ref name="Baker"/><ref name="TextMsg">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/04/us/politics/ukraine-text-messages-volker.html|title=Read the Text Messages Between U.S. and Ukrainian Officials|last=Savage|first=Charlie|date=October 4, 2019|newspaper=[[The New York Times]]|accessdate=October 5, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.today/20191011043711/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/04/us/politics/ukraine-text-messages-volker.html|archive-date=October 11, 2019|last2=Williams|first2=Josh|quote=A newly released set of text exchanges revealed details about President Trump's efforts to use American foreign policy to benefit himself.|authorlink=Charlie Savage|url-access=limited}}</ref> |
|||
In an interview with ''[[The New Yorker]]'' on December 16, Rudy Giuliani said removing the US ambassador to Ukraine became imperative for him and Trump. "I needed Yovanovitch out of the way," Giuliani told the magazine.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50826852|title=Rudy Giuliani 'forced Ukraine ambassador out'|date=2019-12-17|access-date=2019-12-17|language=en-GB}}</ref> |
|||
The scandal reached public attention in mid-September 2019 due to a [[Whistleblower protection in the United States|whistleblower]] complaint made in August 2019.<ref name="timeline">{{Cite news |work=CNN |url=https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/09/politics/impeachment-transcript-takeaways/index.html |title=We read all 2,677 pages of impeachment inquiry testimony released to date. Here's what's clear. |first=Manu |last=Raju |first2=Jeremy |last2=Herb |first3=Marshall |last3=Cohen |access-date=November 11, 2019 |date=November 9, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191110235639/https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/09/politics/impeachment-transcript-takeaways/index.html |archive-date=November 10, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> The complaint raised concerns about Trump using presidential powers to solicit [[foreign electoral intervention]] in the [[2020 U.S. presidential election]].<ref name="WapoComplaintReleased">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/house-intelligence-committee-releases-whistleblowers-complaint-citing-trumps-call-with-ukraines-president/2019/09/26/402052ee-e056-11e9-be96-6adb81821e90_story.html|title=Whistleblower claimed Trump abused his office and that White House officials tried to cover it up|last=Barrett|first=Devlin|date=September 26, 2019|work=[[The Washington Post]]|accessdate=September 29, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.today/20190926143727/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/house-intelligence-committee-releases-whistleblowers-complaint-citing-trumps-call-with-ukraines-president/2019/09/26/402052ee-e056-11e9-be96-6adb81821e90_story.html|archive-date=September 26, 2019|url-access=limited}}</ref> The Trump White House has corroborated several allegations raised by the whistleblower. A non-verbatim transcript of the Trump–Zelensky call confirmed that Trump requested investigations into Joe Biden and his son [[Hunter Biden]], as well as a [[Conspiracy theories related to the Trump–Ukraine scandal|conspiracy theory involving a Democratic National Committee server]], while repeatedly urging Zelensky to work with Giuliani and Barr on these matters.<ref name=Bump27>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/27/trump-says-whistleblower-complaint-isnt-accurate-white-house-keeps-showing-how-it-is/|title=Trump says the whistleblower complaint isn't accurate. The White House keeps showing how it is.|last1=Bump|first1=Philip|date=September 27, 2019|work=[[The Washington Post]]|accessdate=October 4, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.is/yY910|archive-date=October 12, 2019|url-access=limited}}</ref><ref name="helderman">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mounting-evidence-buttresses-the-facts-laid-out-in-whistleblower-complaint/2019/10/05/c752843e-e6b5-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html|title=Mounting evidence buttresses the facts laid out in whistleblower complaint|last=Helderman|first=Rosalind S.|date=October 5, 2019|work=[[The Washington Post]]|accessdate=October 5, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.is/z2m3r|archive-date=October 5, 2019|authorlink=Rosalind Helderman|url-access=limited}}</ref> The White House also confirmed that a record of the call had been stored in a highly restricted system.<ref name="Brown27">{{cite news|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/27/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-transcript-white-house/index.html|title=First on CNN: White House says lawyers directed moving Ukraine transcript to highly secure system|last1=Brown|first1=Pamela|date=September 27, 2019|accessdate=October 4, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.is/UAkcd|archive-date=October 12, 2019|publisher=CNN}}</ref><ref name="Miller28">{{cite news|url=https://www.apnews.com/ec576ac2faa942d18450f7bdfac0ef24|title=Subpoenas mark first concrete steps for Trump impeachment|last1=Miller|first1=Zeke|date=September 28, 2019|accessdate=October 4, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.is/WFEdB|archive-date=October 12, 2019|agency=[[Associated Press]]|last2=Tucker|first2=Eric|last3=Balsamo|first3=Michael}}</ref> White House acting chief of staff [[Mick Mulvaney]] said one reason why Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine was Ukrainian "corruption related to the DNC server", referring to a debunked theory that Ukrainians framed Russia for [[2016 Democratic National Committee email leak|hacking into the DNC]] computer system.<ref name=becket>{{cite news |last1=Becket |first1=Stefan |last2=Segers |first2=Grace |last3=Watson |first3=Kathryn |title=Mulvaney links delay in Ukraine aid to DOJ investigation into 2016—live updates |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/live-news/trump-impeachment-inquiry-latest-kurt-volker-gordon-sondland-testimony-2019-10-17/ |accessdate=October 31, 2019 |work=[[CBS News]] |date=October 18, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191029192841/https://www.cbsnews.com/live-news/trump-impeachment-inquiry-latest-kurt-volker-gordon-sondland-testimony-2019-10-17/ |archive-date=October 29, 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> Trump has also publicly urged Ukraine and China to investigate the Bidens.<ref name="tremendous">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-publicly-calls-on-china-to-investigate-bidens/2019/10/03/2ae94f6a-e5f2-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html|title=Trump publicly calls on China to investigate Bidens|last1=Rucker|first1=Philip|date=October 4, 2019|work=[[The Washington Post]]|accessdate=October 4, 2019|url-status=live|archive-url=https://archive.is/ZDnYX|archive-date=October 12, 2019|last2=Bade|first2=Rachael|last3=Itkowitz|first3=Colby|url-access=limited}}</ref> The Trump administration's top diplomat to Ukraine, [[William B. Taylor Jr.|Bill Taylor]], testified that he was told U.S. military aid to Ukraine and a Trump–Zelensky White House meeting were conditioned on Zelensky publicly announcing investigations into the Bidens and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.<ref name=bade>{{Cite news |last1=Bade |first1=Rachel |last2=Gearan |first2=Anne |last3=Demirjan |first3=Karoun |last4=DeBonis |first4=Mike |title=Trump made Ukraine aid contingent on public pledge to investigate Bidens and 2016 election, U.S. envoy says he was told |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/diplomat-who-raised-alarm-about-withholding-aid-to-ukraine-testifies-in-impeachment-probe/2019/10/22/086fb850-f436-11e9-8cf0-4cc99f74d127_story.html |accessdate=October 28, 2019 |date=October 22, 2019 |work=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> [[United States Ambassador to the European Union]] [[Gordon Sondland]] testified that he worked with Giuliani at Trump's "express direction" to arrange a ''quid pro quo'' with the Ukraine government.<ref>{{cite web|title=Impeachment inquiry: Donald Trump directed Ukraine to dig up dirt on Joe Biden, ambassador claims |date=November 20, 2019 |access-date=November 24, 2019 |publisher=iNews |url=https://inews.co.uk/news/world/donald-trump-impeachment-hearing-ukraine-ambassador-quid-pro-quo-1315067 }}</ref> |
|||
=== Inquiry === |
=== Inquiry === |
Revision as of 19:43, 19 December 2019
This article documents a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The latest updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. (December 2019) |
It has been suggested that Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump and Impeachment trial of Donald Trump be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since December 2019. |
First impeachment of Donald Trump | |
---|---|
Accused | Donald Trump (President of the United States) |
Proponents |
|
Date | December 18, 2019 |
Charges | Abuse of power, obstruction of Congress |
Cause | Allegations that Trump sought help from Ukrainian authorities to favor him in the 2020 U.S. presidential election |
Polls | |
Voting in the House of Representatives | |
Accusation | Abuse of power |
Votes in favor | 230 |
Votes against | 197 |
Result | Approved |
Accusation | Obstruction of Congress |
Votes in favor | 229 |
Votes against | 198 |
Result | Approved |
The impeachment of Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States, occurred on December 18, 2019, when the House of Representatives approved articles of impeachment on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.[1] Impeachment does not remove a president from office, but rather sends the case to the United States Senate, which then holds a trial on whether to convict and remove the President. President Trump's impeachment came after a House impeachment inquiry found that in the Trump–Ukraine scandal, Trump allegedly solicited foreign interference in the 2020 U.S. presidential election to help his re-election bid, and then obstructed the inquiry itself by telling his administration officials to ignore subpoenas for documents and testimony. The inquiry reported that Trump withheld military aid and an invitation to the White House in order to influence Ukraine into announcing investigations into Trump's political rivals.[2][3][4]: 8, 208
The inquiry stage of Trump's impeachment lasted from September to November 2019, in the wake of an August 2019 whistleblower complaint alleging abuse of power by Trump. In October 2019, three congressional committees (Intelligence, Oversight, and Foreign Affairs) deposed witnesses. In November 2019, the House Intelligence Committee held a number of public hearings in which witnesses testified publicly. On December 3, the House Intelligence Committee voted 13–9 along party lines to adopt a final report.
A set of impeachment hearings before the Judiciary Committee began on December 4, 2019. On December 13, the House Judiciary Committee voted 23–17 along party lines to recommend two articles of impeachment: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The Judiciary Committee also released a report on the articles of impeachment on December 16. On December 18, the full House approved both articles of impeachment, making Trump the third president in U.S. history to be impeached. A Senate trial then entered into planning stages, with the Senate having final say as to whether or not Trump should be removed from his office as president following his impeachment.[5]
Background
Previous calls for impeachment
Efforts to impeach President Trump have been made by a variety of people and groups.[6][7] The first efforts in the Republican-controlled Congress were initiated in 2017 by Representatives Al Green and Brad Sherman, both Democrats (D), in response to Trump's obstructions of justice in the Russian influence investigations begun during the first year of Trump's presidency.[8][9][10] A December 2017 resolution of impeachment failed in the House by a 58–364 vote margin.[11]
Democrats gained control of the House of Representatives following the 2018 elections and made Nancy Pelosi the new Speaker. While she opposed any move toward impeachment, she supported multiple committees' respective investigations into Trump's actions and finances.[12][13] On January 17, 2019, new allegations involving Trump surfaced, claiming he instructed his long-time lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie under oath about Trump's conflict-of-interest involvement with the Russian government to erect a Trump Tower in Moscow.[14] This also sparked requests for an investigation and for the president to "resign or be impeached" should such claims be substantiated.[15]
The Mueller Report, released on April 18, 2019, reached no conclusion as to whether Trump had committed criminal obstruction of justice.[16] Special Counsel Robert Mueller strongly hinted that it was up to Congress to make such a determination. Congressional support for an impeachment inquiry increased as a result.[17] House Speaker Nancy Pelosi initially continued to resist calls for impeachment.[18] In May 2019, she indicated that Trump's continued actions, which she characterized as obstruction of justice and refusal to honor congressional subpoenas, might make an impeachment inquiry necessary.[19][20] An increasing number of Democrats and a then-Republican representatives of the House, Justin Amash (who later became an independent), were requesting such an inquiry.[21]
- H. Res. 13 (alleging interference with the Mueller investigation) introduced on January 3, 2019, by Representative Sherman (D-California):[22] immediately referred to the House Judiciary Committee and to Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties on February 4, 2019.[23]
- H. Res. 257 (which would launch an impeachment inquiry with no specific allegations) introduced on March 27, 2019, by Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-Michigan):[24] referred to the House Rules Committee.[25]
- H. Res. 396 (which names 19 areas of inquiry) introduced on May 22, 2019, by Representative Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas):[26] referred to the House Rules Committee.[27]
- H. Res. 498 (which alleges Trump is unfit for office due to racist comments) introduced on July 17, 2019, by Representative Green (D-Texas):[28] a privileged resolution[a] which was blocked from proceeding by a vote of 332–95.[30][31][32]
Fewer than 20 Representatives in the House supported impeachment by January 2019, but this number grew after the Mueller Report was released and after Mueller testified in July, up to around 140 Representatives before the Trump–Ukraine scandal surfaced.[33]
Soon after the release of the Mueller report, Trump began urging an investigation into the origins of the Russia probe, wanting to "investigate the investigators" and possibly discredit the conclusions of the FBI and Mueller.[34] In April 2019, Attorney General William Barr announced that he had launched a review of the origins of the FBI's investigation,[35][36] even though the origins of the probe were already being investigated by the Justice Department's inspector general and by U.S. attorney John Huber, who had been appointed to the same task in 2018 by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions.[37] Barr assigned U.S. Attorney John Durham to lead the probe,[38] and Trump directed the U.S. intelligence community to "promptly provide assistance and information" to Barr, and delegated to him the "full and complete authority" to declassify any related documents.[34][39] Although Durham was nominally in charge of the investigation, Barr himself began contacting foreign governments to ask for information about the origins of the FBI probe. Barr personally traveled to the United Kingdom and Italy to seek information; Italy's parliament is expected to begin its own investigation into Barr's meetings with Italian secret services.[40] At Barr's request, Trump himself phoned the prime minister of Australia, Scott Morrison, to ask for assistance.[41][42]
Trump–Ukraine scandal
Rudy Giuliani and his business associates
In 2018, Florida businessmen Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman hired Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani as a consultant in their security company, paying him $500,000. In turn, Fruman and Parnas assisted him in his search in Ukraine for damaging information about Trump's political opponents.[43][44] Giuliani sent Fruman and Parnas to Ukraine to seek information to undermine the Special Counsel's investigation and damage Biden's presidential campaign.[45] At the same time, Fruman and Parnas were being paid by Dmytro Firtash, a Ukrainian oligarch, with alleged ties to Russian organized crime and the Kremlin, who is facing federal bribery charges in the U.S. and is fighting extradition from Austria.[44][b]
From at least May 2019 to August 2019, Trump and Giuliani pressed the Ukrainian government to launch an investigation that would have negatively affected Trump's political rival Joe Biden in the 2020 election. Giuliani and his associates asked Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky to announce an investigation into the business activities of Hunter Biden.[50] The pressure tactics were developed by Giuliani and Gordon Sondland and applied in part by Parnas and Fruman. Zelensky reportedly felt rattled by the pressure, according to Amos Hochstein, a former diplomat and a member of Naftogaz's supervisory board, who alerted the National Security Council (NSC) of the matter in May 2019.[51] Fruman and Parnas were arrested at Washington Dulles International Airport on October 9, 2019, on campaign finance-related charges brought by federal prosecutors in New York City.[52][43]
The proposed investigation of Biden was based on a 2015 push by the U.S. to remove the Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin because he had been ignoring corruption in Ukraine and protecting political elites. At the time, this request had bipartisan support in the U.S. Congress and was also supported by the European Union.[53][c] Joe Biden, who at the time was vice president, served as the face of this request. Ukraine fired Shokin in early 2016.[54] Trump claimed that Biden's true motivation was to protect his son Hunter, who served on the board of directors of the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings,[55][56][57][58][59] even though Shokin had placed his predecessor's investigation into Burisma on hold.[60][61][62][63] Despite Trump's allegations, no one has produced evidence of any criminal wrongdoing by the Bidens.[64][65][66][67][68][54]
Withholding of military aid and July 25 phone call
By July 18, 2019, Trump had—without explanation—put a hold on $391 million in congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine.[69][70] In a July 25 phone call, Trump repeatedly asked Volodymyr Zelensky to launch two investigations in cooperation with Giuliani and Attorney General Barr.[71][72] One proposed investigation would concern a conspiracy theory—which originated on 4chan in 2017 and was spread by blogs, social media, and Fox News[73]—that connected the American cybersecurity technology company CrowdStrike to Ukrainian actors supposedly interfering in the 2016 election.[74][75] Trump had been repeatedly told by his own aides that this allegation is false, but refused to accept those assurances.[76] The other proposed investigation would concern Joe and Hunter Biden.[71][77][78] At the time of the inquiry, Joe Biden was the leading presidential candidate in Democratic Party primary polling, making him Trump's most likely 2020 opponent.[79]
This July 25 phone call was the subject of an anonymous complaint filed on August 12 in accordance with the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act. In late August, Trump was notified of the whistleblower's complaint.[80] Congress and the public became aware of it on September 9.[81] Two days later, Trump lifted the hold on military aid.[70] House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said on September 13 that he had issued a subpoena to Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire, as Maguire had failed to release the whistleblower's complaint to the congressional intelligence committees, as was arguably required by the relevant statute. Schiff argued that the complaint might have been withheld from Congress "in an unlawful effort to protect the President and conceal from the Committee information related to his possible 'serious or flagrant' misconduct, abuse of power, or violation of law".[82][83]
On September 24, the White House released a non-verbatim memorandum of Trump's conversation with Zelensky.[72][d] The next day, the whistleblower complaint was released to Congress.[86] Trump did not mention the hold on military aid in his conversation with Zelensky, but repeatedly pointed out that the U.S. has been "very very good" to Ukraine, with which Zelensky expressed agreement. Zelensky subsequently asked about obtaining more U.S. missiles, to which Trump replied, "I would like you to do us a favor though" and requested the investigations.[87] The memorandum of the conversation confirmed the whistleblower's allegations that Trump had requested investigations into the Bidens and invoked a conspiracy theory involving a Democratic National Committee server, while repeatedly urging Zelensky to work with Giuliani and Barr on these matters.[88][89]
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren described this sentence as a "smoking gun" suggesting a quid pro quo.[87] Prominent Democrats, including Senators Robert Menendez and Chris Murphy, suggested that the hold may have been intended to implicitly or explicitly pressure the Ukrainian government to investigate Hunter Biden.[90] Former Ukrainian presidential advisor Serhiy Leshchenko said it was made a "clear fact" that Ukraine's communication with the U.S. was dependent on discussing a future investigation into the Bidens,[91] while another anonymous Ukrainian lawmaker said Trump attempted to "pressure" and "blackmail" them into accepting a "quid pro quo" agreement based upon cooperation.[92]
Ukraine
On September 20, 2019, Roman Truba, head of the Ukraine State Bureau of Investigations, told left-wing American news and opinion website The Daily Beast that his agency had not investigated the Biden–Burisma connection and there were no signs of illegality there. Anton Herashchenko, a senior advisor to the Ukraine interior minister, told The Daily Beast that Ukraine will open such an investigation if there is an official request, along with details of why an investigation is needed and what to look for; Trump's requests had come through unofficial representatives such as Giuliani.[93]
Ukrainian foreign minister Vadym Prystaiko told a Ukrainian news outlet on September 21: "I know what the [phone] conversation was about and I think there was no pressure. This conversation was long, friendly, and it touched on many questions, sometimes requiring serious answers."[94] Prystaiko was also quoted as saying: "I want to say that we are an independent state, we have our secrets."[94] On September 22, Senator Murphy said President Zelensky told him he had no intention to get involved with an American election.[95]
In an interview released on September 24, Ukrainian diplomat and politician Valentyn Nalyvaichenko told The Daily Beast that Ukrainian authorities would be reopening corruption investigations into multiple individuals and organizations including, potentially, Burisma, Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, TV host Larry King, and former prosecutor Yuriy Lutsenko. King was suspected of having received slush fund payments recorded in the "black ledger" that also named Manafort. Nalyvaichenko accused Lutsenko of having been in communication with associates of Trump "for vindictive purposes".[96]
Trump and Zelensky held a joint press conference at the United Nations the same day the transcript of their phone call was released. Zelensky told reporters: "We had I think good phone call. It was normal. We spoke about many things. So, I think, and you read it, that nobody pushed me."[97][98][99] The next day, President Zelensky said President Trump had not pressured anyone nor made any promises, and that the Prosecutor General Ruslan Riaboshapka would investigate all domestic cases without prejudice.[100] On September 30, Zelensky made it clear that he was not going to interfere with the intra-American party confrontation.[101] Subsequently, at an all-day press conference on October 10, Zelensky said he had learned about the blockage of the military aid only after the July 25 phone call. "We didn't speak about this. There was no blackmail."[102][103]
The New York Times reported on October 3 that Gordon Sondland, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union, and Kurt Volker, U.S. Special Envoy to Ukraine, had in August drafted a statement for Zelensky to sign that would commit Ukraine to investigate Burisma, the company that Hunter Biden worked for, as well as the conspiracy theory that Ukraine interfered with the 2016 election to benefit Hillary Clinton.[104]
On September 22, shortly after the public had become aware of the existence of a whistleblower, Trump acknowledged that he had discussed Joe Biden during a call with Zelensky on July 25. Trump said, "The conversation I had was largely congratulatory, was largely corruption, all of the corruption taking place, was largely the fact that we don't want our people like Vice President Biden and his son creating to [sic] the corruption already in Ukraine."[105] Trump denied that his hold on military aid for Ukraine was linked to the Ukrainian government's refusal to investigate the Hunter Biden controversy, while also saying that withholding aid for this reason would have been ethically acceptable if he had done it.[106] On September 26, 2019, Trump accused the person who provided the whistleblower with information of the call of being a "spy" and guilty of treason, before noting that treason is punishable by death.[107][108][109] The whistleblower's lawyers said their client feared for his or her safety.[64]
Two people close to Trump told The New York Times that the behavior in the scandal was "typical" of his "dealings on the phone with world leaders", e.g. engaging in flattery, discussing cooperation, and bringing up a personal favor which then could be delegated.[110] In an interview, Giuliani defended Trump, calling the president's request of the Ukrainian president "perfectly appropriate", while also indicating that he himself may have made a similar request to Ukrainian officials.[111] A second whistleblower, who is also an intelligence official, came forward on October 5 with "first-hand knowledge of allegations" associated with the phone call between Trump and Zelensky, according to the lawyer representing both whistleblowers.[112]
Further revelations
On September 27, 2019, the White House confirmed an allegation by the first whistleblower that a record of the call between Trump and Zelensky was sealed in a highly classified computer system at the advice of National Security Council lawyers.[114][115] This came alongside media reports that the White House had used the most highly classified system to store memorandums of conversations with the leaders and officials of countries including Ukraine, Saudi Arabia and Russia. Administration officials had began storing these transcripts into this system after Trump's conversations with Australia's prime minister Malcolm Turnbull and Mexico's president Enrique Peña Nieto leaked earlier in 2017.[116] This was seen by critics and the media as a deliberate attempt to hide potentially damaging information.[117]
On October 3, after saying the U.S. has "tremendous power" and "many options" in the trade war with China "if they don't do what we want", Trump was asked by a reporter on what he hoped Zelensky would do after his phone call. Trump responded by publicly urging both Ukraine and China to investigate the Bidens.[118][113]
In an interview with The New Yorker on December 16, Rudy Giuliani said removing the US ambassador to Ukraine became imperative for him and Trump. "I needed Yovanovitch out of the way," Giuliani told the magazine.[119]
Inquiry
On the evening of September 24, 2019, Pelosi announced that six committees of the House of Representatives would begin a formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump. Pelosi accused Trump of betraying his oath of office, U.S. national security, and the integrity of the country's elections.[120][77][121] The six committees charged with the task are those on Financial Services, the Judiciary, Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, Oversight and Reform, and Ways and Means.[122]
In October 2019, three congressional committees (Intelligence, Oversight, and Foreign Affairs) deposed witnesses including Ambassador Taylor,[123] Laura Cooper (the deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russian, Ukrainian and Eurasian affairs),[124] and former White House official Fiona Hill.[125] Witnesses testified that they believed that President Trump wanted Zelensky to publicly announce investigations into the Bidens and Burisma (a Ukrainian natural gas company on whose board Hunter Biden had served)[126][127] and 2016 election interference.[128] On October 8, in a letter from White House Counsel Pat Cipollone to House speaker Pelosi, the White House officially responded that it would not cooperate with the investigation due to concerns including that there had not yet been a vote of the full House and that interviews of witnesses were being conducted behind closed doors.[129][130] On October 17, Mulvaney said, in response to a reporter's allegation of quid pro quo: "We do that all the time with foreign policy. Get over it." He walked back his comments later in the day, asserting that there had been "absolutely no quid pro quo" and that Trump had withheld military aid to Ukraine over concerns of the country's corruption.[131][132]
On October 29, 2019, Representative Jim McGovern (D-Massachusetts) introduced a resolution (H. Res. 660), referred to House Rules Committee, which set forth the "format of open hearings in the House Intelligence Committee, including staff-led questioning of witnesses, and [authorization for] the public release of deposition transcripts".[133][134] In November 2019, the House Intelligence Committee held a number of public hearings in which witnesses testified publicly. On November 13, Taylor and Kent testified publicly.[135] Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch testified before the committee on November 15, 2019.[136] Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, the National Security Council's head of European Affairs, and Jennifer Williams, Vice President Mike Pence's chief European security adviser, testified together on the morning of November 19, 2019.[137] Later the same day, Kurt Volker, the former U.S. special representative for Ukraine, and Tim Morrison, the former national security presidential adviser on Europe and Russia, gave public testimony before the House Intelligence Committee.[138]
On November 20, 2019, Ambassador Sondland testified that he conducted his work with Giuliani at the "express direction of the president",[139] and that he understood a potential White House invitation for Zelensky to be contingent on Ukraine announcing investigations into the 2016 elections and Burisma.[140][141] Later the same day, Cooper and David Hale, who serves as the under secretary of state for Political Affairs, testified jointly before the committee.[142] On November 21, 2019, Fiona Hill—who until August 2019 was the top Russia expert on the National Security Council—criticized Republicans for promulgating the "fictional narrative" that Ukraine rather than Russia interfered in the 2016 election, asserting that the theory was planted by Russia and played into its hands.[143][144] Testifying alongside Hill was the current head of political affairs in the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, David Holmes.[145][146][147]
On December 3, the House Intelligence Committee voted 13–9 along party lines to adopt a final report and also send it to the House Judiciary Committee.[148][149][4] The report's preface states:
[T]he impeachment inquiry has found that President Trump, personally and acting through agents within and outside of the U.S. government, solicited the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, to benefit his reelection. In furtherance of this scheme, President Trump conditioned official acts on a public announcement by the new Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, of politically-motivated investigations, including one into President Trump's domestic political opponent. In pressuring President Zelensky to carry out his demand, President Trump withheld a White House meeting desperately sought by the Ukrainian President, and critical U.S. military assistance to fight Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine.[4]: 8–9
The Republicans of the House committees had released a countering report the previous day, saying in part that the evidence doesn't support accusations. "The evidence presented does not prove any of these Democrat allegations, and none of the Democrats' witnesses testified to having evidence of bribery, extortion, or any high crime or misdemeanor," said the draft report.[150][151] This report also painted the push to impeachment as solely politically motivated. "The Democrats are trying to impeach a duly elected President based on the accusations and assumptions of unelected bureaucrats who disagreed with President Trump's policy initiatives and processes," the report's executive summary states.[152]
Impeachment
Judiciary Committee hearings
On December 5, Speaker Pelosi authorized the Judiciary Committee to begin drafting articles of impeachment.[153]
A set of impeachment hearings was brought before the Judiciary Committee, with Trump and his lawyers being invited to attend.[154][155] The administration declined, as the president was scheduled to attend a NATO summit in London.[156] In a second letter on December 6, Cipollone again said the White House will not offer a defense or otherwise participate in the impeachment inquiry, writing to chairman Nadler, "As you know, your impeachment inquiry is completely baseless and has violated basic principles of due process and fundamental fairness."[157] Nadler responded in a statement, "We gave President Trump a fair opportunity to question witnesses and present his own to address the overwhelming evidence before us. After listening to him complain about the impeachment process, we had hoped that he might accept our invitation."[158]
The first hearing, held on December 4, 2019, was an academic discussion on the definition of an impeachable offense. The witnesses invited by Democrats were law professors Noah Feldman from Harvard, Pamela S. Karlan from Stanford, and Michael Gerhardt from the University of North Carolina. Republicans invited Jonathan Turley, a constitutional scholar at George Washington University;[159][160] Turley, who had testified in favor of the impeachment of President Bill Clinton in 1999,[161][162] testified against impeaching Trump, citing a lack of evidence.[163] It was observed that he contradicted his own opinion on impeachment from when Clinton was on trial.[164][165][166]
Potential articles of impeachment outlined during the hearing include: abuse of power for arranging a quid pro quo with the president of Ukraine, obstruction of Congress for hindering the House's investigation, and obstruction of justice for attempting to dismiss Robert Mueller during his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.[167] On December 5, Pelosi requested the House Judiciary Committee draft articles of impeachment.[168][169]
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said after the vote that while this was "a great day for the Constitution" it was "a sad day for America". “I could not be prouder or more inspired by the moral courage of the House Democrats. We never asked one of them how they were going to vote. We never whipped this vote,” she said.[170]
Articles of impeachment
On the morning of December 10, 2019, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee announced that they would levy two articles of impeachment, designated H. Res. 755: (1) abuse of power, and (2) obstruction of Congress,[171][172] in its investigation of the President's conduct regarding Ukraine.[173] Draft text of the articles was released later that day,[174] as well as a report by the judiciary committee outlining the constitutional case for impeachment and asserting that "impeachment is part of democratic governance."[175]: 51 The committee planned to vote on the articles on December 12,[176][177] but abruptly postponed it to the next day after the 14-hour partisan debate on the final versions of the articles lasted until after 11:00 p.m. EST.[178] On the morning of December 13,[178] the Judiciary Committee voted along party lines to pass both articles of impeachment; both articles passed 23–17, with all Democrats present voting in support and all Republicans present voting in opposition. The articles were forwarded to the full House for debate and a vote on whether to impeach the president on December 18.[179]
The House Judiciary Committee released a 658-page report on the articles of impeachment on December 16. It specifies criminal bribery and wire fraud charges as part of the abuse of power article.[180] The Judiciary Committee votes to approve the articles of impeachment were as follows:
Article I vote | Article II vote |
---|---|
■ Democratic: 23 yes, 0 no ■ Republican: 0 yes, 17 no |
■ Democratic: 23 yes, 0 no ■ Republican: 0 yes, 17 no |
House vote
Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution states that "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."[181]
The House Rules Committee held a hearing to write the rules governing the debate over impeachment on December 17.[182] The first, of three votes, was on the rules governing debate: 228 to 197, with all Republicans and two Democrats voting no.[183] This was followed by six hours of debate. One of the highlights of this contentious event was Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) comparing the impeachment inquiry of President Trump to the trial of Jesus Christ, saying that the Christian savior was treated far better by the authorities.[184]
The formal impeachment vote in the House of Representatives took place on December 18, 2019.[185] Shortly after 8:30 pm EST (01:30 UTC), both articles of impeachment passed.[186] The votes for the charge of abuse of power were 230 in favor, 197 against, and 1 present: House Democrats all voted in support except Collin Peterson (MN) and Jeff Van Drew (NJ), who voted against, and Tulsi Gabbard (HI), who voted "present"; all House Republicans voted against, although former Republican turned Independent Justin Amash (MI) voted in support of both articles.[187] The votes for the charge of obstruction of Congress were 229 in favor, 198 against, and 1 present: all Democrats voted in support except Peterson, Van Drew, and Jared Golden (ME), who voted against; and Gabbard, who again voted "present".[188]
Three soon-to-be-retiring representatives did not vote: Duncan D. Hunter (R-CA), who was banned from voting under the House's rules after pleading guilty to illegally using campaign funds; José E. Serrano (D-NY), who had a health setback after being diagnosed with Parkinson's disease earlier in the year; and John Shimkus (R-IL), who was visiting his son in Tanzania.[189]
Article I[190] (Abuse of power) |
Article II[191] (Obstruction of Congress) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yea | Nay | Present | Yea | Nay | Present | |||||
Democratic | 229 | Collin Peterson and Jeff Van Drew | 1 | Democratic | 228 | Collin Peterson, Jeff Van Drew, and Jared Golden | 1 | |||
Republican | 195 | Republican | 195 | |||||||
Independent | 1 | Independent | 1 | |||||||
Total | 230 | 197 | 1 | Total | 229 | 198 | 1 | |||
Adopted | Adopted |
Preparation for Senate trial
As the articles of impeachment moved to a vote before the full House and referral to the Senate for trial, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell met with White House Counsel Pat Cipollone and congressional liaison Eric Ueland, later stating, "Everything I do during this I'm coordinating with the White House counsel. There will be no difference between the president's position and our position as to how to handle this."[194] McConnell also said there was "No chance" the Senate would convict Trump and remove him from office, while declaring his wish that all Senate Republicans would acquit Trump of both articles of impeachment.[195] Two days later, Judiciary Committee chairman Lindsey Graham stated, "I am trying to give a pretty clear signal I have made up my mind. I'm not trying to pretend to be a fair juror here ... I will do everything I can to make [the impeachment trial] die quickly."[196] Three days later, McConnell stated, "I'm not an impartial juror. This is a political process. There is not anything judicial about it. Impeachment is a political decision."[197] The Constitution mandates senators to take an impeachment oath, in which by Senate rules is stated, "I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws, so help me God."[198][199]
On December 15, Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, in a letter to McConnell, called for Mulvaney, Robert Blair, John Bolton and Michael Duffey to testify in the expected Senate trial, and suggested that pre-trial proceedings take place on January 6, 2020.[200] Two days later, McConnell rejected the call for witnesses to testify, saying that the Senate's job is only to judge, not to investigate. Schumer quickly replied, citing bipartisan public support for the testimony of witnesses who could fill in gaps caused by Trump preventing his staff from testifying in the House investigation.[201][202]
Citing a need to "See what the process is on the Senate side," on the day of the impeachment Pelosi declined to commit on when, or even if, the impeachment resolution would be transmitted to the Senate, stating, "So far we haven’t seen anything that looks fair to us."[203]
Public opinion
As of mid December 2019, Americans remained sharply divided on whether Trump should be removed from office.[204] A USA Today/Suffolk University poll conducted on December 10–14, 2019 found that 45% of respondents supported the impeachment and removal of Trump of office, while 51% opposed it.[205] A CNN poll conducted on December 12–15 also found 45% supported impeachment, compared to 48% who opposed the idea.[206] A Gallup poll released on the day of Trump's impeachment found that Trump's approval rating increased by 6 points during the impeachment process, while support for the impeachment fell. [207]
Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Support[e] | Oppose[e] | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YouGov/Yahoo! News[208] | Dec 4–6 | 1500 | ± 2.8% | 47% | 39% | 16% |
Monmouth University[209] | Dec 4–8 | 903 | ± 3.3% | 45% | 50% | 5% |
Fox News[210] | Dec 8–11 | 1000 | ± 3% | 50% | 41% | 5% |
NPR / PBS NewsHour / Marist[211] | Dec 9–11 | 1508 | ± 3.5% | 46% | 49% | 5% |
USA Today / Suffolk[205] | Dec 10–14 | 1000 | ± 3% | 45% | 50% | 5% |
Quinnipiac University[212] | Dec 11–15 | 1390 | ± 4.1% | 45% | 51% | 4% |
CNN / SSRS[206] | Dec 12–15 | 888 | ± 3.7% | 45% | 48% | 9% |
Notes
- ^ Privileged business takes precedence over the regular order of business, so the House addressed it right away.[29]
- ^ Firtash also hired Joseph diGenova and Victoria Toensing, a husband and wife team of attorneys with ties to Giuliani and Trump and who frequently appear on Fox News to promote conspiracy theories related to Ukraine.[46][47] DiGenova and Toensing met with Attorney General William Barr and other Justice Department officials in a failed attempt to convince the prosecutors to drop the charges against Firtash.[48][49]
- ^ Ukraine is not a European Union member, but has sought to become one, a move that Russia and pro-Russia Ukrainians have sought to obstruct.
- ^ Alexander Vindman later testified that this transcript omitted crucial words and phrases, including 'Burisma', the name of the company Hunter Biden had worked for.[84][85]
- ^ a b These polls are color-coded relative to the margin of error (×2 for spread). If the poll is within the doubled margin of error, both colors are used. If the margin of error is, for example, 2.5, then the spread would be 5, so a 50% support / 45% oppose would be tied.
References
- ^ Fandos, Nicholas; Shear, Michael D. (December 18, 2019). "Trump Impeached for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress – Voting nearly along party lines, the House approved two articles of impeachment against President Trump, making him the third president in history to face removal by the Senate". The New York Times. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
- ^ Mascaro, Lisa; Jalonick, Mary Clare; Miller, Zeke; Long, Colleen; Tucker, Eric; Colvin, Jill (December 3, 2019). "House Releases 300-Page Report Outlining Evidence for Trump's Impeachment". Time. Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 7, 2019. Retrieved December 11, 2019.
- ^ Weiland, Noah (December 3, 2019). "Impeachment Briefing: The Democratic Report". The New York Times. Retrieved December 11, 2019.
- ^ a b c House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (December 3, 2019). "Report of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Pursuant to H. Res. 660 in Consultation with the House Committee on Oversight and Reform and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs" (PDF). U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 4, 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2019.
- ^ Shear, Michael D.; Baker, Peter (December 18, 2019). "Key Moments: The Day the House Impeached Trump". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ Revesz, Rachael (January 20, 2017). "Website aiming to impeach Donald Trump so popular it crashed". The Independent. Archived from the original on October 8, 2019. Retrieved October 8, 2019.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; October 7, 2019 suggested (help) - ^ Gold, Matea (January 20, 2017). "The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 22, 2017. Retrieved January 20, 2017.
- ^ Singman, Brooke (June 7, 2017). "Reps. Green and Sherman announce plan to file articles of impeachment". Fox News. Archived from the original on June 7, 2017. Retrieved June 7, 2017.
- ^ Draft resolutions: Sherman, Brad (June 12, 2017). "Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors" (PDF). United States House of Representatives. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 12, 2017. Retrieved June 12, 2017. and Green, Al (May 17, 2017). "Calling for Impeachment of the President" (PDF). Congressional Record. Vol. 63, no. 85. United States House of Representatives. pp. H4227 – H4228. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 1, 2017. Retrieved May 17, 2017. (video at YouTube Archived June 9, 2017, at the Wayback Machine)
- ^ McPherson, Lindsey (June 12, 2017). "Democratic Rep. Sherman Drafts Article of Impeachment Against Trump". Roll Call. Archived from the original on July 1, 2017. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
- ^ DeBonis, Mike (December 6, 2017). "House votes to kill Texas lawmaker's Trump impeachment effort". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 7, 2017. Retrieved December 6, 2017.
- ^ Werner, Erica; DeBonis, Mike (November 7, 2018). "Democrats take House, breaking up GOP's total control of government". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 25, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Fandos, Nicholas (March 4, 2019). "With Sweeping Document Request, Democrats Launch Broad Trump Corruption Inquiry". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 4, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Leopold, Jason; Cormier, Anthony (January 17, 2019). "President Trump Directed His Attorney Michael Cohen To Lie To Congress About The Moscow Tower Project". Buzzfeed News. Archived from the original on January 18, 2019. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
- ^ Barnes, Tom (January 18, 2019). "Trump told to 'resign or be impeached' if reports he instructed attorney Cohen to lie to congress are proven". The Independent. Archived from the original on January 18, 2019. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
- ^ Morgan, David; Wolfe, Jan (July 24, 2019). "Mueller says Trump was not exonerated; Trump declares victory". Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2019. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
- ^ Hayes, Christal (May 29, 2019). "Democratic calls for Donald Trump impeachment grow after Mueller's first public remarks". USA Today. Archived from the original on June 2, 2019. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
- ^ Jalonick, Mary Clare; Mascaro, Lisa (March 11, 2019). "Pelosi waves off impeachment, says it would divide country". The Seattle Times. Associated Press. Archived from the original on July 10, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Breuninger, Kevin; Wilkie, Christina (May 7, 2019). "Nancy Pelosi: Trump is 'goading' Democrats to impeach him to solidify his base". CNBC. Archived from the original on May 20, 2019. Retrieved May 23, 2019.
- ^ Foran, Clare; Serfaty, Sunlen; Killough, Ashley (May 9, 2019). "Pelosi: Trump 'is almost self-impeaching because he is every day demonstrating more obstruction of justice'". CNN. Archived from the original on May 23, 2019. Retrieved May 23, 2019.
- ^ Watkins, Eli; Bohn, Kevin (May 19, 2019). "GOP Rep. Amash becomes first Republican to say Trump 'engaged in impeachable conduct'". CNN. Archived from the original on May 19, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Connolly, Griffin (January 3, 2019). "Brad Sherman to introduce impeachment articles against Trump on first day of Democratic Congress". Roll Call. Archived from the original on January 3, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ "Actions—H.Res.13—116th Congress (2019–2020): Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors". Congress.gov. United States House of Representatives. February 4, 2019. Archived from the original on September 25, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Serfaty, Sunlen; Killough, Ashley (March 27, 2019). "Tlaib formally submits impeachment resolution". CNN. Archived from the original on September 25, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ "Actions—H.Res.257—116th Congress (2019–2020): Inquiring whether the House of Representatives should impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America". Congress.gov. United States House of Representatives. March 27, 2019. Archived from the original on April 17, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Mathis-Lilley, Ben (May 21, 2019). "House Democrat Announces Plan to (Deep Breath) Introduce Inquiry Into Investigating Whether to Consider Impeachment". Slate. Archived from the original on August 22, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ "Actions—H.Res.396—116th Congress (2019–2020): Authorizing and directing the Committee on the Judiciary to investigate whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise the power vested by article 1, section 2, clause 5 of the Constitution in respect to acts of misconduct by Donald John Trump, President of the United States". Congress.gov. May 23, 2019. Archived from the original on September 25, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Herb, Jeremy; Killough, Ashley (July 16, 2019). "Democratic lawmaker introduces articles of impeachment against Trump". CNN. Archived from the original on August 13, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Saturno, James V. (January 23, 2013). "Privileged Business on the House Floor" (PDF). Federation of American Scientists. Congressional Research Service.
- ^ "Actions—H.Res.498—116th Congress (2019–2020): Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, of high misdemeanors". Congress.gov. July 17, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ McPherson, Lindsey (July 17, 2019). "House blocks Al Green articles of impeachment of Trump". Roll Call. Archived from the original on September 3, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Segers, Grace; Kaplan, Rebecca; Brown, Kimberly (July 17, 2019). "House votes down rogue effort to impeach Trump". CBS News. Archived from the original on August 4, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Bump, Philip (September 25, 2019). "The most important number in the impeachment fight keeps getting smaller". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
- ^ a b "Trump Steps Up Calls for Investigation Into Origin of Russia Investigation". KTLA. Associated Press. May 23, 2019. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
- ^ Goldman, Adam; Savage, Charlie; Schmidt, Michael S. (May 13, 2019). "Barr Assigns U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russia Inquiry". The New York Times. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
- ^ Johnson, Kevin (May 14, 2019). "Attorney General taps top Connecticut federal prosecutor for review of Trump-Russia inquiry". USA Today. Retrieved May 17, 2019.
- ^ Balsamo, Michael (May 14, 2019). "AP source: Barr launches new look at origins of Russia probe". Associated Press News. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
- ^ Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam; Fandos, Nicholas (May 14, 2019). "Scrutiny of Russia Investigation Is Said to Be a Review, Not a Criminal Inquiry". The New York Times. Retrieved May 17, 2019.
- ^ Chalfant, Morgan (May 24, 2019). "Trump orders intel agencies to cooperate with Barr probe into 'spying' on 2016 campaign". The Hill. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
- ^ "Reports: White House asked UK, Italy, Australia to help discredit Russia probe". The Times of Israel. October 2, 2019. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
- ^ Prokop, Andrew (September 30, 2019). "Trump and Barr have been urging foreign governments to help them investigate the Mueller probe's origins". Vox. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
- ^ Duffy, Connor; Greene, Andrew (October 1, 2019). "Donald Trump reportedly pressed Scott Morrison for help to discredit Mueller inquiry". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ a b Helderman, Rosalind S.; Dawsey, Josh; Sonne, Paul; Hamburger, Tom (October 12, 2019). "How two Soviet-born emigres made it into elite Trump circles—and the center of the impeachment storm". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 14, 2019.
- ^ a b Friedman, Dan (October 18, 2019). "How an indicted oligarch became a key player in Trump's Ukraine scandal". Mother Jones. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Vogel, Kenneth P. (October 10, 2019). "Giuliani's Ukraine Team: In Search of Influence, Dirt and Money". The New York Times. Archived from the original on October 11, 2019. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
- ^ Mackinnon, Amy (October 3, 2019). "Giuliani's Claims Spread to Another Ukraine Corruption Case". Foreign Policy. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Baker, Stephanie; Reznik, Irina (October 18, 2019). "To Win Giuliani's Help, Oligarch's Allies Pursued Biden Dirt". Bloomberg. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Zapotosky, Matt; Helderman, Rosalind S.; Hamburger, Tom; Dawsey, Josh (October 22, 2019). "Prosecutors flagged possible ties between Ukrainian gas tycoon and Giuliani associates". Washington Post. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Ward, Vicky; Cohen, Marshall (November 1, 2019). "'I'm the best-paid interpreter in the world': Indicted Giuliani associate touted windfall from Ukrainian oligarch". CNN. Retrieved November 2, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Pilkington, Ed; Roth, Andrew (September 29, 2019). "Rudy Giuliani: Ukraine sources detail attempt to construct case against Biden". The Guardian. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
- ^ "White House Told in May of Ukraine President Zelenskiy's Concern About Giuliani, Sondland". NBC4 Washington. October 28, 2019. Retrieved October 30, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Schmidt, Michael S.; Protess, Ben; Vogel, Kenneth P.; Rashbaum, William K. (October 12, 2019). "Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani 'under investigation' for lobbying Ukraine". The Independent. Retrieved October 14, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Gienger, Viola; Goodman, Ryan (November 27, 2019). "Timeline: Trump, Giuliani, Bidens, and Ukraine (updated)". Just Security. Retrieved November 28, 2019.
- ^ a b Kaczynski, Andrew; Steck, Em (October 3, 2019). "Republican senators echoed Biden in urging Ukrainian president to reform prosecutor general's office". CNN. Retrieved November 28, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Cullison, Alan; Ballhaus, Rebecca; Volz, Dustin (September 21, 2019). "Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine President to Investigate Biden's Son". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on September 23, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Zapotosky, Matt; Miller, Greg; Nakashima, Ellen; Leonnig, Carol D. (September 20, 2019). "Trump pressed Ukrainian leader to investigate Biden's son, according to people familiar with the matter". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 22, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Barnes, Julian E.; Schmidt, Michael S.; Vogel, Kenneth P.; Goldman, Adam; Haberman, Maggie (September 20, 2019). "Trump Pressed Ukraine's Leader on Inquiry Into Biden's Son". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 23, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Lemire, Jonathan; Balsamo, Michael; Mascaro, Lisa (September 21, 2019). "Trump, in call, urged Ukraine to investigate Biden's son". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on September 21, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Vogel, Kenneth P. (May 9, 2019). "Rudy Giuliani Plans Ukraine Trip to Push for Inquiries That Could Help Trump". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 4, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Raymond, Adam K. (May 7, 2019). "Everything We Know About the Joe Biden–Ukraine Controversy". New York. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
- ^ Braun, Stephen; Berry, Lynn (September 23, 2019). "The story behind Biden's son, Ukraine and Trump's claims". Associated Press. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
- ^ Vogel, Kenneth P.; Mendel, Iuliia (May 1, 2019). "Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump and Allies". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
- ^ Schreckinger, Ben (August 3, 2019). "The Biden family's strange business history". Politico. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
- ^ a b "Trump: I want to meet my accuser". Agence France-Presse. September 30, 2019. Archived from the original on October 1, 2019. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday he wants and deserves to meet the anonymous whistleblower at the center of the fast-moving scandal that has triggered an impeachment probe against him ... Brandishing what he said were affidavits incriminating Biden's son Hunter over his work at a Ukrainian company, Giuliani said Trump was duty bound to raise the issue with Kyiv. Trump and his allies claim Biden, as Barack Obama's vice president, pressured Kyiv to fire the country's top prosecutor to protect his son Hunter, who sat on the board of a gas company, Burisma Holdings, accused of corrupt practices. Those allegations have largely been debunked and there has been no evidence of illegal conduct or wrongdoing in Ukraine by the Bidens.
- ^ Matthias, Williams; Polityuk, Pavel (September 26, 2019). "Zelenskiy opponents say comments about Europeans to Trump could hurt Ukraine". Reuters. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
Trump pressed Zelenskiy to investigate the business dealings of the son of his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic front-runner to challenge Trump in an election next year. Zelenskiy agreed. Biden's son Hunter worked for a company drilling for gas in Ukraine. There has been no evidence of wrongdoing by either Biden.
- ^ Isachenkov, Vladimir (September 27, 2019). "Ukraine's prosecutor says there is no probe into Biden". PBS. Associated Press. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
Though the timing raised concerns among anti-corruption advocates, there has been no evidence of wrongdoing by either the former vice president or his son.
- ^ "White House 'tried to cover up details of Trump-Ukraine call'". BBC News. September 26, 2019. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
There is no evidence of any wrongdoing by the Bidens.
- ^ Timm, Jane (September 25, 2019). "There's no evidence for Trump's Biden-Ukraine accusations. What really happened?". NBC News. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
But despite Trump's continued claims, there's no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of either Biden.
- ^ Ballhaus, Rebecca; Restuccia, Andrew; Hughes, Siobhan (September 24, 2019). "Trump Put Hold on Military Aid Ahead of Phone Call With Ukraine's President". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b Zengerle, Patricia; Brice, Makini (September 12, 2019). Osterman, Cynthia; Maler, Sandra (eds.). "Trump administration reinstates military aid for Ukraine". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 25, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
whistleblower
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b Cite error: The named reference
transcript
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Collins, Ben (October 3, 2019). "Trump seized on a conspiracy theory called the 'insurance policy.' Now, it's at the center of an impeachment investigation". NBC News. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ Reilly, Steve (September 25, 2019). "What to know about CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity company mentioned in Trump's phone call with Zelensky". USA Today. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
- ^ McDonald, Scott (September 25, 2019). "What is CrowdStrike, the U.S. Company Trump Asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr to Look Into?". Newsweek. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
- ^ Stolberg, Sheryl Gay; Haberman, Maggie; Baker, Peter (September 30, 2019). "Trump Was Repeatedly Warned That Ukraine Conspiracy Theory Was 'Completely Debunked'". The New York Times. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
- ^ a b Fandos, Nicholas (September 24, 2019). "Nancy Pelosi Announces Formal Impeachment Inquiry of Trump". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on September 24, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Rucker, Philip; Bade, Rachael; Costa, Robert (September 25, 2019). "Trump deflects and defies as Democrats speed up impeachment strategy". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
- ^ Lee, Jasmine C.; Daniel, Annie; Lieberman, Rebecca; Migliozzi, Blacki; Burns, Alexander (June 14, 2019). "Which Democrats Are Leading the 2020 Presidential Race?". The New York Times. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
- ^ Davis, Aaron C.; Viebeck, Elise; Dawsey, Josh (November 27, 2019). "Witness testimony and records raise questions about account of Trump's 'no quid pro quo' call". Washington Post. Retrieved November 28, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ LaFraniere, Sharon; Kramer, Andrew E.; Hakim, Danny (November 11, 2019). "Key Dates at the Center of the Ukraine Matter". The New York Times. Retrieved November 19, 2019.
- ^ U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (September 13, 2019). "Chairman Schiff Issues Subpoena for Whistleblower Complaint Being Unlawfully Withheld by Acting DNI from Intelligence Committees". United States House of Representatives (Press release). Retrieved October 2, 2019.
- ^ "The complaint" (PDF). Retrieved October 6, 2019 – via house.gov.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
corrected
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Vindmand firsthand
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Segers, Grace (September 25, 2019). "DNI to provide Congress with whistleblower complaint—live updates". CBS News. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b Stevenson, Chris (September 25, 2019). "'I would like you to do us a favour though': The one sentence that could bring Trump down". The Independent. Retrieved October 3, 2019.
- ^ Bump, Philip (September 27, 2019). "Trump says the whistleblower complaint isn't accurate. The White House keeps showing how it is". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ Helderman, Rosalind S. (October 5, 2019). "Mounting evidence buttresses the facts laid out in whistleblower complaint". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 5, 2019. Retrieved October 5, 2019.
- ^ Demirjian, Karoun; Dawsey, Josh; Nakashima, Ellen; Leonnig, Carol D. (September 23, 2019). "Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
- ^ Reevell, Patrick; Bruggeman, Lucien (September 25, 2019). "Biden probe was condition for Trump–Zelenskiy phone call: Ukrainian adviser". ABC News. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
- ^ Engel, Richard [@RichardEngel] (September 30, 2019). "A former Ukrainian lawmaker deeply familiar with the Giuliani dirt-digging campaign told me Trump's phone call to the Ukrainian president asking for an investigation into the Bidens, while withholding vital military aid, was "pressure", "blackmail", and "quid pro quo"" (Tweet). Retrieved September 30, 2019 – via Twitter.
- ^ Mangan, Dan (September 20, 2019). "Trump urged Ukraine president eight times during call to investigate Joe Biden's son, report says". CNBC. Archived from the original on September 20, 2019. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
- ^ a b Williams, Matthias; Deepa, Babington; Russell, Ros (September 21, 2019). "Ukraine minister denies Trump put pressure on Zelenskiy during call: report". Reuters. Archived from the original on October 3, 2019. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
- ^ Klar, Rebecca (September 22, 2019). "Democratic senator: Ukrainian president said he has 'no intention' to interfere with U.S. election". The Hill. Archived from the original on October 4, 2019. Retrieved September 22, 2019.
- ^ Nemtsova, Anna (September 24, 2019). "Ukraine Likely to Reopen Probe of Hunter Biden Firm: Sources". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on September 25, 2019. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
- ^ Stuart, Tessa (September 25, 2019). "'No Pressure', Trump Insists, While Sitting With Ukraine's Zelensky at U.N." Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on September 27, 2019. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
- ^ O'Reilly, Andrew (September 25, 2019). "Ukraine president, in meeting with Trump, says 'nobody pushed me' to probe Biden". Fox News. Archived from the original on October 3, 2019. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
- ^ MacDonald, Jordan (September 26, 2019). "Ukraine's president on Trump call: 'Nobody pushed me'". CNBC. Archived from the original on October 1, 2019. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
- ^ Romanenko, Maria (September 26, 2019). "Ukraine's Zelenskyy Denies Singling Out "Biden Case"". Hromadske.TV. Archived from the original on October 4, 2019. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
- ^ Sukhov, Oleg (September 30, 2019). "Zelensky rebuffs Trump's request to investigate Biden". Kyiv Post. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Karmanau, Yuras (October 10, 2019). "Ukraine president says there was 'no blackmail' in call with Trump". PBS. Associated Press. Retrieved November 1, 2019.
- ^ "Zelensky holds all-day press conference". Kyiv Post. October 10, 2019. Retrieved November 1, 2019.
- ^ Vogel, Kenneth P.; Schmidt, Michael S. (October 3, 2019). "Trump Envoys Pushed Ukraine to Commit to Investigations". The New York Times. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
- ^ Baker, Peter (September 22, 2019). "Trump Acknowledges Discussing Biden in Call With Ukrainian Leader". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 25, 2019. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
- ^ Haberman, Maggie; Fandos, Nicholas; Crowley, Michael; Vogel, Kenneth P. (September 23, 2019). "Trump Said to Have Frozen Aid to Ukraine Before Call With Its Leader". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
- ^ Haberman, Maggie (September 26, 2019). "Trump Attacks Whistle-Blower's Sources and Alludes to Punishment for Spies". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
- ^ Sheth, Sonam; Panetta, Grace (September 26, 2019). "Trump suggested the whistleblower who filed a complaint against him is guilty of treason, which is punishable by death". Business Insider. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
- ^ Stokols, Eli (September 26, 2019). "Trump at private event: 'Who gave the whistleblower the information? Because that's close to a spy'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
- ^ Haberman, Maggie; Crowley, Michael; Rogers, Katie (September 25, 2019). "Trump's Not-So-Excellent Day". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
- ^ Itkowitz, Colby (September 20, 2019). "Giuliani admits to asking Ukraine about Joe Biden after denying it 30 seconds earlier". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
- ^ "Trump impeachment: Second whistleblower emerges". BBC News. October 7, 2019. Retrieved October 8, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b Borger, Julian; Gambino, Lauren (October 4, 2019). "Trump calls on China to investigate Biden in extraordinary demand". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 8, 2019. Retrieved October 5, 2019.
{{cite news}}
:|archive-date=
/|archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; October 27, 2019 suggested (help) - ^ Brown, Pamela (September 27, 2019). "First on CNN: White House says lawyers directed moving Ukraine transcript to highly secure system". CNN. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ Miller, Zeke; Tucker, Eric; Balsamo, Michael (September 28, 2019). "Subpoenas mark first concrete steps for Trump impeachment". Associated Press News. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ Salama, Vivian (September 28, 2019). "Embarrassing Leaks Led to Clampdown on Trump's Phone Records". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 10, 2019.
- ^ Heath, Brad (September 27, 2019). "A computer server haunted Clinton in 2016. Now it may be Trump's turn". Reuters. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
- ^ Rucker, Philip; Bade, Rachael; Itkowitz, Colby (October 4, 2019). "Trump publicly calls on China to investigate Bidens". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 12, 2019. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ "Rudy Giuliani 'forced Ukraine ambassador out'". December 17, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
- ^ Bade, Rachael; DeBonis, Mike (September 24, 2019). "Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry, says Trump's courting of foreign political help is a 'betrayal of national security'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on September 24, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ Przybyla, Heidi; Edelman, Adam (September 24, 2019). "Nancy Pelosi announces formal impeachment inquiry of Trump". NBC News. Archived from the original on September 24, 2019. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
- ^ McPherson, Lindsey (September 24, 2019). "Pelosi announces formal impeachment inquiry, but leaves some questions". Roll Call. Archived from the original on September 24, 2019. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
- ^ Becket, Stefan; Farhi, Arden; Watson, Kathryn (October 23, 2019). "Top diplomat tells lawmakers Ukraine aid was directly tied to investigations". CBS News. Archived from the original on November 8, 2019. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- ^ Moe, Alex; Shabad, Rebecca (October 23, 2019). "Key Pentagon official finally testifies after Republicans storm impeachment hearing". NBC News. Archived from the original on October 24, 2019. Retrieved October 24, 2019.
- ^ Demirjian, Karoun; Harris, Shane; Rachael, Bade (October 14, 2019). "Trump's ex-Russia adviser told impeachment investigators of Giuliani's efforts in Ukraine". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
- ^ Kramer, Andrew E. (November 7, 2019). "Ukraine's Zelensky Bowed to Trump's Demands, Until Luck Spared Him". The New York Times. A. G. Sulzberger. ISSN 0362-4331. OCLC 1645522. Archived from the original on November 7, 2019. Retrieved November 26, 2019.
- ^ Kramer, Andrew E. (October 24, 2019). "The Cost of Trump's Aid Freeze in the Trenches of Ukraine's War". The New York Times. A. G. Sulzberger. ISSN 0362-4331. OCLC 1645522. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved November 13, 2019.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
bade
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "White House 'will not co-operate with impeachment inquiry'". BBC News. October 9, 2019. Retrieved October 9, 2019.
- ^ Blake, Aaron (October 9, 2019). "The White House's scathing and legally dubious impeachment letter, annotated". The Washington Post. Fred Ryan. ISSN 0190-8286. OCLC 2269358. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
becket
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Smith, Allan (October 17, 2019). "Mulvaney acknowledges Trump held up Ukraine aid for political reasons: 'Get over it'". NBC News. Archived from the original on October 24, 2019. Retrieved November 5, 2019.
- ^ "Four Chairs Statement on Resolution for Open Hearings on Trump's Abuse of Power". House Foreign Affairs Committee. Archived from the original on October 30, 2019. Retrieved October 30, 2019.
- ^ Segers, Grace; Watson, Kathryn; Tillett, Emily; Becket, Stefan (October 29, 2019). "House Democrats unveil impeachment resolution—live updates". CBS News. Archived from the original on October 30, 2019. Retrieved October 30, 2019.
- ^ Demirjian, Karoun (November 13, 2019). "Impeachment hearings begin with new evidence of phone call implicating Trump in Ukraine controversy". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ Herb, Jeremy; Raju, Manu (November 15, 2019). "Former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine tells impeachment inquiry she was 'shocked and devastated' after being removed from her post". CNN. Retrieved November 15, 2019.
- ^ Bertrand, Natasha; Forgey, Quint; Marshall, Abbey (November 19, 2019). "Election meddling, an 'improper' call, and twins: What we learned in Vindman and Williams' testimony". Politico. Archived from the original on November 19, 2019. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
- ^ "Morrison and Volker are the witnesses Republicans requested". CNN. November 19, 2019. Archived from the original on December 15, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ Edelman, Adam (November 20, 2019). "6 things we learned from Gordon Sondland's impeachment testimony". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 20, 2019. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
- ^ "Trump seeks to distance himself from Sondland". Financial Times. November 20, 2019. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
- ^ Baker, Peter; Schmidt, Michael S. (November 20, 2019). "Impeachment Hearing Live Updates: Gordon Sondland Ties Trump to Ukraine Pressure Campaign". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
- ^ "3 takeaways from Laura Cooper's and David Hale's testimony". Washington Post.
- ^ Shear, Michael D. (November 21, 2019). "Impeachment Inquiry Live Updates: Fiona Hill Denounces 'Fictional' Claim of Ukraine Meddling in 2016". The New York Times.
- ^ Mascaro, Lisa; Jalonick, Mary Clare; Tucker, Eric (November 22, 2019). "Ex-official undercuts Trump defense: Hill testifies to diplomat's 'domestic political errand' and warns against Russia". Associated Press. Archived from the original on November 22, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ "WATCH: Witness David Holmes expresses concerns about Giuliani's role in Ukraine". PBS NewsHour. Associated Press. November 21, 2019. Retrieved November 21, 2019.
- ^ Bump, Philip. "David Holmes made clear how pressure was applied to Ukraine—and how that pressure continues". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 24, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ "Who is David Holmes and why does his public testimony matter?". Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ Raju, Manu; Herb, Jeremy (December 3, 2019). "House Democrats vote to send impeachment report to Judiciary Committee". CNN. Archived from the original on December 3, 2019. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
- ^ Blitzer, Ronn; Re, Gregg (December 3, 2019). "House Democrats vote to adopt Trump impeachment report, blast scheme to 'solicit foreign interference' in 2020 race". Fox News. Archived from the original on December 4, 2019. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
- ^ Bart Jansen; Christal Hayes (December 2, 2019). "House GOP report on impeachment inquiry defends Trump's dealings with Ukraine". USA Today. Archived from the original on December 7, 2019. Retrieved December 12, 2019.
- ^ "READ: Republican Report On The Impeachment Inquiry". NPR. December 2, 2019. Archived from the original on December 12, 2019. Retrieved December 12, 2019.
- ^ Taylor, Jessica (December 2, 2019). "House GOP Rebuts Democrats' Impeachment Efforts: No 'Bribery, Extortion' Proven". NPR. Archived from the original on December 12, 2019. Retrieved December 12, 2019.
- ^ Rowland, Geoffrey (December 6, 2019). "The Hill's Morning Report — Pelosi makes it official: Trump will be impeached". TheHill. Archived from the original on December 6, 2019. Retrieved December 6, 2019.
- ^ Gregorian, Dareh (November 26, 2019). "House Judiciary Committee announces first impeachment hearing, invites Trump to attend". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 27, 2019. Retrieved November 27, 2019.
- ^ Gambino, Lauren (November 26, 2019). "Trump invited to House judiciary committee's first impeachment hearing". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 10, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
- ^ "Trump will not participate in impeachment hearing, White House says". BBC News. December 2, 2019. Archived from the original on December 4, 2019. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
- ^ Schultz, Marisa (December 6, 2019). "White House won't participate in impeachment hearings, tells Nadler to 'end this inquiry now'". Fox News. Archived from the original on December 6, 2019. Retrieved December 6, 2019.
- ^ Kim, Seung Min (December 6, 2019). "White House rejects House Democrats' invitation to participate in impeachment process as Trump focuses on friendly Senate". Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 7, 2019. Retrieved December 8, 2019.
- ^ "House Judiciary reveals witnesses for first impeachment hearing". Politico. December 2, 2019. Archived from the original on December 3, 2019. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
- ^ "The Worst Congress Ever". Rolling Stone. October 17, 2006. Archived from the original on November 30, 2006.
- ^ "Clinton Impeachment Testimony". House Judiciary Committee. August 20, 2007. Archived from the original on December 6, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
- ^ "The Impeachment Hearings, Debate on Article IV". Federal News Service. December 12, 1998. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
- ^ "GOP witness to say Trump impeachment would set a 'dangerous precedent'". The Hill. December 4, 2019. Archived from the original on December 4, 2019. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
- ^ Sheth, Sonam (December 4, 2019). "The GOP's only impeachment witness on Wednesday contradicted his own previous testimony". Business Insider. Archived from the original on December 5, 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2019.
- ^ Pierce, Charles (December 4, 2019). "Jonathan Turley Is Exhibit A That the Clinton Debacle Never Really Ended". Esquire. Archived from the original on December 11, 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2019.
- ^ Crowley, James (December 4, 2019). "Trump impeachment hearings: Legal scholars' testimony in both Trump, Clinton cases stress 'Abuse of power'". Newsweek. Archived from the original on December 5, 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2019.
- ^ Megerian, Chris; Haberkorn, Jennifer; Wire, Sarah D. (December 4, 2019). "Democrats outline potential articles of impeachment against Trump". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 4, 2019. Retrieved December 4, 2019.
- ^ "Pelosi announces full speed ahead with articles of impeachment against Trump". NBC News. December 5, 2019. Archived from the original on December 6, 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2019.
- ^ "Democrats take big new step toward impeaching Trump". Star Tribune. December 5, 2019. Archived from the original on December 5, 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2019.
- ^ "US President Donald Trump Impeached". ConnectedtoIndia. December 19, 2019..
- ^ Desiderio, Andrew; Cheney, Kyle; Caygle, Heather (December 10, 2019). "Democrats unveil 2 articles of impeachment against Trump". Politico. Archived from the original on December 10, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
- ^ Fandos, Nicholas (December 10, 2019). "House Democrats Unveil Articles of Impeachment Against Trump". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 10, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
- ^ Wagner, John; Epstein, Kayla; Brice-Saddler, Michael (December 10, 2019). "House Democrats unveil two articles of impeachment against Trump; White House predicts 'full exoneration' in GOP-led Senate". The Washington Post. Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on December 11, 2019. Retrieved December 11, 2019.
- ^ "Read the articles of impeachment against Trump". Axios. December 10, 2019. Archived from the original on December 10, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
- ^ "READ: Articles of impeachment against President Trump". CNN. December 10, 2019. Archived from the original on December 10, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
- ^ McCarthy, Tom (December 10, 2019). "Trump impeachment inquiry: what are the next steps?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 10, 2019. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
- ^ "H. Res. 755, Articles of Impeachment Against President Donald J. Trump". Committee on the Judiciary – Democrats. December 11, 2019.
- ^ a b Shabad, Rebecca (December 12, 2019). "In surprise move infuriating Republicans, Judiciary Committee delays impeachment vote until Friday". NBC News. Archived from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 12, 2019.
- ^ Siegel, Benjamin; Faulders, Katherine (December 13, 2019). "House Judiciary Committee passes articles of impeachment against President Trump". ABC News. Retrieved December 13, 2019.
- ^ "Democrats accuse Trump of criminal bribery, wire fraud in report that explains articles of impeachment". The Washington Post. December 16, 2019. Archived from the original on December 16, 2019. Retrieved December 16, 2019.
- ^ "Constitution of the United States". United States Senate. Archived from the original on February 10, 2014. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ "Rules Committee Announces Meeting to Consider Resolution Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for High Crimes and Misdemeanors". House of Representatives Committee on Rules. December 13, 2019. Archived from the original on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
- ^ Herb, Jeremy; Raju, Manu. "House debates impeachment of President Donald Trump ahead of historic vote Wednesday". CNN. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
- ^ "Rep. Barry Loudermilk compares Trump impeachment to trial of Jesus Christ – CNN Video". Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2019 – via www.cnn.com.
- ^ Fritze, John (December 18, 2019). "House impeaches Donald Trump in historic vote, reshuffling U.S. politics on eve of 2020". USA Today. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Trump becomes third president to be impeached". BBC News. December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Haberkorn, Jennifer; Wire, Sarah D.; Megerian, Chris; O'Toole, Molly (December 18, 2019). "U.S. House impeaches President Trump". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
- ^ Fandos, Nicholas; Shear, Michael D. (December 18, 2019). "Trump Impeached for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
- ^ Daly, Matthew (December 18, 2019). "3 Lawmakers Miss Historic Impeachment Votes". Associated Press. US News. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 695". United States House of Representatives. December 18, 2019. Archived from the original on December 19, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 696". United States House of Representatives. December 18, 2019. Archived from the original on December 19, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 695". United States House of Representatives. December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 696". United States House of Representatives. December 18, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ Carney, Jordain (December 12, 2019). "McConnell says he'll be in 'total coordination' with White House on impeachment trial strategy". TheHill.
- ^ Egan, Lauren (December 13, 2019). "McConnell: 'There's no chance' Trump is removed from office". Archived from the original on December 15, 2019. Retrieved December 16, 2019.
- ^ Veronica Stracqualursi. "'I'm not trying to pretend to be a fair juror here': Graham predicts Trump impeachment will 'die quickly' in Senate". CNN.
- ^ Ted Barrett; Ali Zaslav. "Mitch McConnell: 'I'm not an impartial juror' ahead of Senate impeachment trial". CNN.
- ^ Johnson, Martin (December 13, 2019). "House Democrat calls on McConnell to recuse himself from impeachment trial". TheHill.
- ^ "Procedure and Guidelines for Impeachment Trials in the United States Senate (Revised Edition)". U.S. Government Publishing Office. August 15, 1986. Archived from the original on October 26, 2019. Retrieved December 15, 2019.
- ^ "Democrats call for witnesses in impeachment trial". BBC. December 16, 2019. Archived from the original on December 16, 2019. Retrieved December 16, 2019.
- ^ "'Cover Up': McConnell Won't Allow Crucial Witnesses to Testify at Trump Impeachment Trial". lawandcrime.com. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
- ^ Ted Barrett. "McConnell rejects Schumer's call for witnesses at impeachment trial". CNN. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved December 18, 2019.
- ^ Swanson, Ian (December 18, 2019). "Pelosi noncommittal on delivering impeachment articles to Senate". The Hill. Archived from the original on December 19, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ Bycoffe, Aaron (December 17, 2019). "Do Americans Support Impeaching Trump?". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on October 21, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
- ^ a b Cummings, Susan Page, Nicholas Wu and William. "USA TODAY poll: Narrow majority opposes removing Trump from office if he is impeached". USA TODAY. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Agiesta, Jennifer. "CNN Poll: The nation remains divided on impeachment as House vote approaches". CNN. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
- ^ McCarthy, Justin. "Trump Approval Inches Up, While Support for Impeachment Dips".
- ^ "Yahoo News! Impeachment Tracker" (PDF).
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Murray, Patrick (December 11, 2019). "Most Say Trump Hindered Inquiry, But Impeachment Opinion is Unmoved". Monmouth.edu. Archived from the original on December 11, 2019. Retrieved December 11, 2019.
- ^ "Fox News Poll results December 8–11, 2019". Fox News. December 15, 2019. Archived from the original on December 15, 2019. Retrieved December 16, 2019.
- ^ "NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll of 1,744 National Adults" (PDF). Marist Institute for Public Opinion. December 11, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved December 19, 2019.
- ^ "QU Poll Release Detail". Quinnipiac University. Archived from the original on December 16, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2019.
External links
- How each member of the House voted on impeachment — via CNN
- House impeaches President Trump – live-stream archive via C-SPAN
- Current events from December 2019
- Articles to be merged from December 2019
- Impeachment in the United States
- 116th United States Congress
- 2019 controversies in the United States
- Donald Trump controversies
- Donald Trump
- Political corruption investigations in the United States
- Trump administration controversies
- United States presidential history
- Impeachment of Donald Trump