User talk:Adoring nanny

Welcome!

Hello, Adoring nanny, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Srich32977. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Socialism seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 03:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Eurabia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Basically the sources need to discuss the subject of the article, which is very different from writing an essay where you can use sources not discussing the subject to build up an argument. Doug Weller talk 18:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Please see my reply on the article's talk page.Adoring nanny (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

I've seen it and replied. And removed a whole section someone else wrote where the sources were about something else entirely. Doug Weller talk 17:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)r

Nomination of NASA Martian Bee Plan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NASA Martian Bee Plan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASA Martian Bee Plan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Mackeeper

I've undone your edits to the subject page. They were fairly major edits. We can certainly discuss the matter further on the article talk page, if you wish. a one line mention of the article may be valuable however it's not something worthy of editing the lead or features sections.Labattblueboy (talk) 13:03, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Joey Watkins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joey Watkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Watkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brian Frosh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emoluments Clause (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Adoring nanny. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Adoring nanny. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 20:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Please avoid editing in the Arab-Israeli area until you have 500 edits

That applies to any content relating to the conflict even if the article itself isn't devoted to it. I see you last few edits have been in violation of this. I'm presuming you didn't read the section heading here. Doug Weller talk 20:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

You're right, I missed that. Sorry.Adoring nanny (talk) 23:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

No problem. Doug Weller talk 08:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Killian documents authenticity issues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Ralph Northam yearbook page with Klan robe and blackface.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ralph Northam yearbook page with Klan robe and blackface.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. B (talk) 13:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign interventions by the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Murder of Hae Min Lee

Please come to the talk page of the Murder of Hae Min Lee article for discussion about the edits..

Thank you,

Cynistrategus (talk) 09:29, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Once there was a small country with a mighty army. They fought with considerable skill and won many victories. However, the more victories they won, the more enemies they made, and eventually they were thrown onto the defensive. They continued fighting with considerable skill, but in the end they were defeated. Their terrific tactical skill, which is admired to this day, did not make up for their lack of grand strategy. Adoring nanny (talk) 12:36, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

I have opened a Third Opinion Dispute on the Murder of Hae Min Lee page.

Cynistrategus (talk) 17:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

You just reverted an article that was sourced with reliable secondary sources. In addition many of the claims from Undisclosed and all from the Undisclosed Wiki and a Reddit AMA are not Wikipedia Reliable sources.

Cynistrategus (talk) 08:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reliable sources Because you may disagree with the content of a journalistic reliable source does not mean that you can just revert them away. Please refrain from doing so in the future.

BLP DS notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 El_C 02:34, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cynistrategus (talk) 02:58, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

American Politics Discretionary Sanctions Notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Also please review the one about BLPs above. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Opinions in Taki's Magazine

Hi. The closer of RfC: Taki's Magazine said: "There is also agreement that even as an opinion publication this source should be avoided outside of very limited exceptions (e.g. WP:ABOUTSELF)." The closer (on talk page thread Taki's Magazine RfC said that your comment indicated that you do not disagree. Is that correct? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Seems about right. Adoring nanny (talk) 23:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Then I was wrong. Thank you. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 00:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Don't give up!

	You have a true and honest heart
	I'd just like to let you know that I appreciate your attempts at trying to keep the Daniel Holtzclaw article fair and unbiased. I too believe he's being treated unfairly, and that those who have been opposing you on your contributions to his article are being belligerently ignorant in order to maintain a "politically correct status quo." N432138 (talk) 08:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

General sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 11:07, 11 April 2020 (UTC)