User talk:Kendrick7

This editor is a Tutnum of the Encyclopedia and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, and Chewed Broken Pencil.

Archive
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Nomination of Ayman Taha (American soldier) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayman Taha (American soldier) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayman Taha (American soldier) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Humayun Khan

Why did you create Humayun Khan (soldier)? The subject fails WP:MILPEOPLE and all the coverage is about this DNC argument, so WP:BLP1E applies. I'd like to hear your explanation before I take it to AfD. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hey, now. I created the bio before it became a full-on political football,[1] with simply the WP:GNG in mind (or as the first sentence of WP:MILPEOPLE explains "In general, an individual is presumed to be notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources.") That was good enough for me.

I don't believe that the subsequent passing back and forth of the ball between the Trump and Clinton campaigns would make his bio any less notable.

Furthermore, I would suggest that the ensuing controversy might best be split off into it's own article, but... frankly, I did something similar with Mitt Romney's tax returns back in 2012, but then that article got deleted, and when I tried to undo my split, I got indef blocked by @Timotheus Canens for ~5 months until I finally convinced @Beeblebrox: to give me another chance.

As such, my learned advice to you, per WP:TIND, is to just ride this out until after the election; 20 weeks is short and the arc of WP:5P is long. August is a slow news month in any year,[2] which makes it during a Presidential election year High Holy Silly Season.

Still, if you really want to turn this into a Wikipedian political football too, just send it to AfD. Fools rush in where angels fear to tread. It'll only bring out the worse in all of us. -- Kendrick7^talk 23:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

The claim "I created the bio before it became a full-on political football" isn't so. The sources (and the stub you created) are based on coverage solely because the Khan family's appearance at the DNC. None of that coverage was ever about CPT Khan, himself, independent of the hubub and you know that. Now to say that I dare not send it to AfD because of the ensuing furor is disappointing from a ten year editor. It would appear you get joy out of creating these stubs about people and things that aren't really notable. In the future, please be more careful. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Maybe I've used slightly the wrong metaphor, but football is a sport that requires two teams playing. I honestly didn't expect Khizr and Ghazala Khan to end up much more than a footnote to the DNC 2016 article due to being Chelsea Clinton's opening act; now they have their own article.

You're correct that if I have two and a half reliable sources about someone or something I find even remoting interesting and a working keyboard, I'll probably stub out an article and I do take joy in that. Here's another one I'm quite proud of; yeesh, has it really been almost eight years?[3] -- Kendrick7^talk 11:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Humayun Khan (soldier) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Humayun Khan (soldier) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humayun Khan (soldier) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference spacing

Hi there,

Saw this at Humayun Khan (soldier). Not actually interested to get involved in that particular back-and-forth, but it made me curious. I understand each parameter on a separate line for templates not used in the text, like infoboxes. I'd also understand someone having a preference for them to be displayed that way with named references stored together at the bottom. But why that way in the text? When I see that, I presume it's because someone copy/pasted or used a citation tool and nobody has gone through to clean it up yet. To me a citation that takes up as much space as two paragraphs negatively affects usability/editability. Although I regularly remove such line breaks, I don't think I've ever been reverted for it (nor can I remember seeing a revert, except perhaps for an infobox). Seeing this ongoing dispute, however, makes me realize that I don't know what basis there is in the MOS or elsewhere for either position. WP:CITEVAR doesn't cover it (it's not a change in citation style/method), nor do I see anything on the rest of Wikipedia:Citing sources. If there's a page, or perhaps an RfC, could you point me to it? Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 00:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

What is truth? redirect

I've nominated the redirect What is truth?, which you retargeted in 2007, for discussion. See the redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 September 16#What is truth. Jason Quinn (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kendrick7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:People from Indiana in the Iraq War has been nominated for discussion

Category:People from Indiana in the Iraq War, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marquardtika (talk) 21:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Wall of text listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wall of text. Since you had some involvement with the Wall of text redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:70th millennium BC has been nominated for discussion

Category:70th millennium BC, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=3dz0m2ubQw1KSnb_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_7QJK0vYNdV9NJdj&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

U. S. security listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect U. S. security. Since you had some involvement with the U. S. security redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kendrick7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mansour Haj Azim

The article Mansour Haj Azim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable BLP. The only reference is a trivial mention from 2007, and no other references are found in a brief search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jessica Valenti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Loki's Wager for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loki's Wager is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loki's Wager (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zubin12 (talk) 11:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Fix the Debt

I saw that you were the one who established the redirect from Fix the Debt to Peter George Peterson. I recently submitted a draft on the subject to AfC, but it hasn't received any attention yet. Would you be interested in collaborating on and reviewing the draft I created?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much for taking the time to look over my draft! Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help out. I really appreciate it.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 16:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks again for your help with publishing that article! I have one more question for you, if you have the time. Now that there's a dedicated article to Fix the Debt, do you think it'd be appropriate to replace the content in this section on David Cote with a {{Main}} article template point to Fix the Debt?--FacultiesIntact (talk) 20:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Israa al-Ghomgham

On 22 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Israa al-Ghomgham, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Israa al-Ghomgham could become the first Saudi woman to be beheaded as punishment for defending human rights? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Israa al-Ghomgham. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Israa al-Ghomgham), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The mirror of simple souls.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The mirror of simple souls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kendrick7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (University of Farmington) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating University of Farmington.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

merged with University of Farmington scam as the duplicate article on the same topic

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DBigXray}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DBigXrayᗙ 13:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Russian-occupied Eastern Poland listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Russian-occupied Eastern Poland. Since you had some involvement with the Russian-occupied Eastern Poland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Andy Azula for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Azula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Azula until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (United States v. Joseph) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating United States v. Joseph.

User:Whoisjohngalt while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for adding this article to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whoisjohngalt}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ramsey Orta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramsey Orta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramsey Orta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Viztor (talk) 19:48, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dorothy Cullman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Morris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konstantin Kilimnik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Pia Klemp

Hello, Kendrick7,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pia Klemp should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pia Klemp .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 14:09, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Sigma personality listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sigma personality. Since you had some involvement with the Sigma personality redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Honeywell Lead section

Hello Kendrick7, I've been working on factual updates to the Honeywell article, and I'd like to get another pair of eyes on it. I have a WP:COI with Honeywell, so I'm refraining from editing directly. I saw you helped my former colleague FacultiesIntact, with Honeywell related projects in the past. If you have time, can you review my proposed updates for the lead? I intend to collaborate with a Wikipedian without a COI on these updates. I appreciate it.--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi Kendrick7 I wanted to follow up with you about the Honeywell lead section. Is this an article of interest to you? Chefmikesf (talk) 16:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Kendrick7, Thanks for taking a keen eye to the article. Can you help me understand your approach to reorganizing the lead and history section? Can you help me see what you saw when you came to the article?--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Kendrick7 Thank you for the context and additions to the article. I see where you're coming from. I believe the lead paragraph falls short of giving the reader context about the article and Honeywell as a whole, especially when considering WP: Lead. The lead should summarize the article as a whole, and it feels deficient relative to such a long article. I think some of the content moves make sense, but we could add to the lead while keeping it NPOV. Also, if you found it challenging to put the content originally in the lead paragraphs, perhaps it might help to collaborate.

Before making any changes, I wanted to run this lead proposal by you. Would you be open to coming up with a solution here before bringing this to the main article space?

Here is my sandbox for reference.Chefmikesf (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

@Kendrick7: Hey there, happy holidays. I wanted to follow up on this if you've been busy on other things. The lead is critical to the article, so if you're unavailable, I may bring in other collaborators on the article.--Chefmikesf (talk) 19:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

"Bot accounts" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bot accounts. Since you had some involvement with the Bot accounts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk) 03:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Twitter suspensions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

"Bot account" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bot account. Since you had some involvement with the Bot account redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

"Atomic bombings of Japan as a form of state terrorism" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Atomic bombings of Japan as a form of state terrorism. Since you had some involvement with the Atomic bombings of Japan as a form of state terrorism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:19, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve SHC014-CoV

Hello, Kendrick7,

Thank you for creating SHC014-CoV.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 16:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of religious slurs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hymie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

"Dawn of civilization" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dawn of civilization. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Dawn of civilization until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 20:35, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Guy (help!) 09:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

For completeness

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Guy (help!) 14:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hi Kendrick7. At the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard #Kendrick7, you seem to have gone to lengths to circumvent an edit filter designed to prevent linking to the content revealing the name of living person. One admin has already opined that it's a blockable offence under BLP and I agree with him. I do understand that you may be merely trying to make a point about Wikipedia not being censored, but in this case, it's a step too far. Please don't do anything similar to that again, otherwise I am certain that an uninvolved admin will not hesitate to sanction you. Thank you for your understanding. --RexxS (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)