Jump to content

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AssumptionBot: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Discussion: note close of RfC
trial
Line 55: Line 55:
<!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion -->
<!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion -->
*I'm not going to decline this outright, if only to allow for feedback and other opinions, but not all drafts need to go through AFC, and so having a bot place the template on ''every'' draft is extremely problematic. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
*I'm not going to decline this outright, if only to allow for feedback and other opinions, but not all drafts need to go through AFC, and so having a bot place the template on ''every'' draft is extremely problematic. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
*{{BotOnHold}} until the RFC (which I have fixed the link to) has completed. In the future, get consensus ''before'' filing a request. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
*{{t|BotOnHold}} until the RFC (which I have fixed the link to) has completed. In the future, get consensus ''before'' filing a request. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
*{{Ping|Primefac}} Not sure if this is a misunderstanding, but it's the unsubmitted template, not the submitted one ([[Template:afc submission/draft]]). <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:AssumeGoodWraith|AssumeGoodWraith]] ([[User talk:AssumeGoodWraith#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AssumeGoodWraith|contribs]]) 12:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)</span>
*{{Ping|Primefac}} Not sure if this is a misunderstanding, but it's the unsubmitted template, not the submitted one ([[Template:afc submission/draft]]). <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:AssumeGoodWraith|AssumeGoodWraith]] ([[User talk:AssumeGoodWraith#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AssumeGoodWraith|contribs]]) 12:28, 16 February 2022 (UTC)</span>
*:I know, and my point still stands - not every draft is meant to be sent for review at AFC, and so adding the template to every draft is problematic. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
*:I know, and my point still stands - not every draft is meant to be sent for review at AFC, and so adding the template to every draft is problematic. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Line 65: Line 65:
*:::Yes, if there are errors in the code, please sort them out sooner rather than later, as there is little point in further delaying a request because known bugs still need fixing. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 13:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
*:::Yes, if there are errors in the code, please sort them out sooner rather than later, as there is little point in further delaying a request because known bugs still need fixing. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 13:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
* I'd like to note that I've [[Special:Diff/1077888113|closed]] the RfC on this task. From the close: "There is consensus for such a bot, provided that it does not tag drafts created by experienced editors. The consensus on which users are experienced enough is less clear, but it looks like (auto)confirmed is a generally agreed upon threshold." [[User:Tol|<span style="color:#f542d7">Tol</span>]] ([[User talk:Tol|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contribs/Tol|contribs]]) @ 19:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
* I'd like to note that I've [[Special:Diff/1077888113|closed]] the RfC on this task. From the close: "There is consensus for such a bot, provided that it does not tag drafts created by experienced editors. The consensus on which users are experienced enough is less clear, but it looks like (auto)confirmed is a generally agreed upon threshold." [[User:Tol|<span style="color:#f542d7">Tol</span>]] ([[User talk:Tol|talk]] &#124; [[Special:Contribs/Tol|contribs]]) @ 19:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
*:{{BotTrial|edits=50|days=21|first=yes}} This is based on the assumption that the bot will only be adding the template to non-AC creations. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:37, 27 March 2022

New to bots on Wikipedia? Read these primers!

Operator: AssumeGoodWraith (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 11:34, Wednesday, February 16, 2022 (UTC)

Function overview: Adds AFC unsubmitted templates to drafts.

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: I think this works?

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § Bot proposal (AFC submission templates)

Edit period(s): Meant to be continuous.

Estimated number of pages affected: ~100 a day, judging by the new pages feed (about 250 today) and assuming that not many drafts are left without the afc template

Namespace(s): Draft

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes (pywikibot)

Function details: Adds AFC unsubmitted templates ( {{afc submission/draft}} ) to drafts in draftspace that don't have them, the {{draft article}} template, or anything that currently redirects to those 2. See the examples in the VPR proposal listed above.

Discussion