Jump to content

Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron – Rescue list: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
clsoed keep Jawahar
Line 46: Line 46:
<center>'''<big>{{mdash}} Please post new entries at the ''top'' of the list {{mdash}}</big>'''</center>
<center>'''<big>{{mdash}} Please post new entries at the ''top'' of the list {{mdash}}</big>'''</center>
<!-- New Article Rescue candidates should be placed on top of the list, below this line -->
<!-- New Article Rescue candidates should be placed on top of the list, below this line -->

==[[Entrepreneur (magazine)]] at RSN==
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#RFC:_Reliability_of_Entrepreneur_(magazine)]]
Used in over 1,000 articles. Removal of this source could weaken the notability of many articles, lead to deletion of content from Wikipedia, hamper addition of new content, and the creation of new articles in the future, at scale. -- [[User:GreenC|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User talk:GreenC|<span style="color: #093;">'''C'''</span>]] 22:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


==[[Wilbert Ting Tolentino]]==
==[[Wilbert Ting Tolentino]]==
Line 57: Line 61:
:Give minutes after you posted that in the AFD the nominator withdrew their nomination. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 12:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
:Give minutes after you posted that in the AFD the nominator withdrew their nomination. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 12:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
{{archive bottom}}

==[[Lycanthrope (Dungeons & Dragons)]] and [[Undead (Dungeons & Dragons)]]==
==[[Lycanthrope (Dungeons & Dragons)]] and [[Undead (Dungeons & Dragons)]]==
*{{Find sources|Lycanthrope "Dungeons & Dragons"}}
*{{Find sources|Lycanthrope "Dungeons & Dragons"}}

Revision as of 22:16, 20 September 2020


ARS Code of Conduct
  • Note that this wikiproject is only intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting votes or vote-stacking. Be sure to follow the guideline on canvassing. This means, in part, that you should use Template:Rescue list on the deletion discussion page when you list the discussion here.
  • Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
  • Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Wikipedia's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.
For more information about article rescue, please refer to ARS Tips to help rescue articles and ARS Rescue guide
For additional article improvement listings, check out this project's archives and listings at WikiProject Cleanup

This is a list and discussion of Wikipedia content for rescue consideration. When posting here, please be sure to:

  • First familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's guidelines for topic notability and identifying reliable sources, as well as the prohibition on inappropriate canvassing
  • Include a specific rationale why the article/content should be retained on Wikipedia, and any ideas to improve the content. Please ensure that your comment here is neutrally worded. (You can also !vote to delete an article at its deletion discussion because you think it is untenable in its present state, and still list it here in the hope that another editor will find a way to improve it and save it.)
  • You should disclose in a deletion discussion that a post has been made at the rescue list.
  • Sign posts with four tildes ~~~~.
  • Place the {{subst:rescue list|~~~~}} template in Articles for deletion discussions, to notify editors about the listing here. The tag can be placed below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

The following templates can be used for articles listed here:

  • *{{Find sources|Article name}} - Adds source search options
  • *{{lagafd|Article name}} - Adds relevant links
  • *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (2nd nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated twice
  • *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (3rd nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated 3 times
  • *{{lagafd|Article name|Article name (Nth nomination)}} - Likewise but for page nominated N ≥ 4 times
Shortcuts


— Please post new entries at the top of the list —

Entrepreneur (magazine) at RSN

Used in over 1,000 articles. Removal of this source could weaken the notability of many articles, lead to deletion of content from Wikipedia, hamper addition of new content, and the creation of new articles in the future, at scale. -- GreenC 22:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wilbert Ting Tolentino

SPEEDY KEEP
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nom. Eddie891

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I’ve added sources so I think GNG is met. Gleeanon409 (talk) 04:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Give minutes after you posted that in the AFD the nominator withdrew their nomination. Dream Focus 12:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lycanthrope (Dungeons & Dragons) and Undead (Dungeons & Dragons)

These two are currently redirects, and the old article contents were moved to Draft:Lycanthrope (Dungeons & Dragons) and Draft:Undead (Dungeons & Dragons) earlier this year after their AFDs in hopes that they could one day be restored to article space. 2601:249:8B80:4050:8918:F0BC:E864:4A8E (talk) 13:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transformers (board game)

REDIRECT
The result was redirect board games. I started working on it, but it was redirected in the middle of my research. I was not fussed because it was slow going and sparse.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This one was put up for PROD, but most likely I will be merging (or at least redirecting) if there are no sources for it. BOZ (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mordenkainen

Possibly the most famous character created by Gary Gygax. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 15:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lifespan (video game)

(Last one for now, I promise - I didn't want to list all three at once to be overwhelming, and all the other articles I restored or started have been successfully restored by other editors.)

I built this article from an existing redirect, using one review and some citations from the article it redirected to. An editor restored the redirect, but I took another look as I should have done and found three more reviews and another source as you can see in this version of the article, but it was still reverted by another editor; can anyone help me find additional sources to help assert notability? 2601:243:1C00:E800:DC2B:6DF7:CF88:4464 (talk) 01:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it. [1] There are enough sources to prove it meets the general notability guidelines. You need to write something about the gameplay. You can search for YouTube videos and see what it was all about as well. I did that earlier with another such article you created. [2] Dream Focus 03:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SocialCred

Artificial moon

So far I find China's announce plan, and what Russia attempted years ago. Is there coverage elsewhere? Surely others have tried this at times as well. Dream Focus 05:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dream Focus:, Google Scholar has quite a few hits. Gleeanon409 (talk) 04:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Killer Bees!

I restored this article which was previously redirected in 2013, but it was reverted. I restored it again to add more reviews and other WP:RS but the same user reverted it again. I tried once more and demonstrated that I had links to four reviews plus other sources as seen in this version of the article, but it was reverted yet again by another user; can anyone help me find additional sources to help assert notability? 2601:243:1C00:E800:DC2B:6DF7:CF88:4464 (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I might recommend adding the content to the Robert S. Harris article and editing it there until you have enough to establish notability. It makes it easier than fighting over the stub versus redirect while you're trying to work on it. Normal Op (talk) 07:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I actually did that already, thanks!: [3] 2601:243:1C00:E800:DC2B:6DF7:CF88:4464 (talk) 12:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorcerer's Apprentice (Atari 2600)

I built an article on this early Disney video game from an existing redirect, but it was reverted. Someone helped me find several WP:RS to bring it up to five reviews in the article (and links to two more non-English reviews) to this version of the article, and yet it was still reverted for some reason; can anyone help me find additional sources to help assert notability? 2601:243:1C00:E800:DC2B:6DF7:CF88:4464 (talk) 16:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You found ample proof of notability, just someone made a mistake, or didn't bother to read the current version of the article. I reverted them back to your last version. Dream Focus 16:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Dream Focus! 2601:243:1C00:E800:DC2B:6DF7:CF88:4464 (talk) 20:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I formatted a source here. To demonstrate. In this case we see Electronic Fun with Computers & Games is a notable magazine with its own article - a reliable source. This was previously uncertain. There is the author, title and page number of the article such that anyone can read it and see it is non-trivial and length. The "cite journal" is also impressive to many readers as it usually indicates a quality source. All this improves the impression the article is based on quality sources, making it less susceptible to negative attention. -- GreenC 23:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aliza Ayaz

Aliza Ayaz is an international youth climate activist. I think that at least some of the current references could be used to secure at least a stub or start class article. Esowteric+Talk 09:18, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the "paid editing" template: The first edit to the article was by Az.jooma with the edit summary "KGS IT staff creating page". KGS is likely "Karachi Grammar School" which the subject attended. So the article could just as easily have been created by staff and students who share an interest in their relatively-illustrious one-time student. Certainly these editors look more like novices than professionals. Esowteric+Talk 09:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It used to be we used a COI tag for cases like this, but the paid editor banner is becoming more frequent because the "$" symbol gets people's attention - too bad as it dilutes the banners real meaning (companies that are paid to edit Wikipedia on a client's behalf). There is no evidence of anyone being paid for the express purpose of editing Wikipedia. -- GreenC 14:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, COI is something to consider. Esowteric+Talk 14:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Current refs World Urban Forum (ref 1, perhaps, minor); ARY News.tv (ref 2); BrandSynario (ref 3, perhaps: depends on how material is sourced); Geo News (ref 5) look reliable to me. Bloomsbury Festival (ref 20) looks reliable for uncontroversial material; ditto Events at Cambridge Students' Union (ref 22); and The News International (ref 31). Esowteric+Talk 14:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update by one of the page editors: Have added and double checked at least 10 independent sources to confirm genuinity and notability on the page itself. These include the United Nations itself (World Urban Forum), the official Bloomsbury Festival which is popular local festival, the official University College London (world famous university), multiple independent news platforms: The News International, Geo News, ARY News, DAWN news. Have removed any quotes that were first flagged as possible "COI" or un-neutral tones. They were initially references to podcasts and hence, this may have appeared as linked to "a close connection" or non-neutral, but this has been removed now. The article should be ok to keep now, hopefully! Any suggestions welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studentsunion (talk • contribs) 00:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! The Career section is a close paraphrase or direct copy in parts, and it needs looking at. Short quotes can be used directly, in "quotes", with a reference after each quotation. Please sign comments by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of the comment. This will auto-generate your signature. Thanks. Esowteric+Talk 12:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Native Americans and horses

DRAFT
The result was Draftify. Some say that "an article being in poor shape is not reason for deletion" - but that doesn't exclude draftification, as consensus here determines. Any recreation should, given the concerns here, go through AfC or a consensus-based process. Sandstein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bonus points if you can remember the name of Tonto's horse. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Doda

KEEP
The result was keep. Kept and closed per WP:SNOW. Close is procedural as there is no way a sensible discussion can be had on 43 topics. Bundling 2-maybe 6 related topics is workable, 43 cannot be. (non-admin closure) John from Idegon

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Scores of articles in a proposed mass deletion. Scores of articles. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Keep Per closer: "The result was keep. Kept and closed per WP:SNOW. Close is procedural as there is no way a sensible discussion can be had on 43 topics. Bundling 2-maybe 6 related topics is workable, 43 cannot be." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of prisoners of war

KEEP
The result was keep. Eddie891

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There are many POWs in need of rescue. For inspiration, see notable escapes and rescues. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of Brazilian racing drivers

NO CONSENSUS
The result was no consensus, after extended time for discussion, nor is there any measure of support for draftification. BD2412 T

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Also includes List of German racing drivers in the same AFD. Is there a way to copy all the things listed in Category:Brazilian racing drivers into the proper list? Perhaps a bot to read infobox data to add to columns? Dream Focus 00:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I did find and replace to turn [[ into a |-[[ and ]] into ]]||| so all of the things from the category are now in a list. The only problem is I can't changed anything into a newline(enter key). If anyone knows how to do that with Wikipedia or other software please let me know. Having to go in manually and add a bunch of enters is rather tedious. Dream Focus 03:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Buck’s Store Museum

REDIRECT
The result was redirect to Bena, Virginia. Make up your mind, people. Redirect is a compromise since you apparently can't. Content can be merged from history; if not, see WP:RFD. Sandstein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Redirect Per the closer: "The result was redirect to Bena, Virginia. Make up your mind, people. Redirect is a compromise since you apparently can't. Content can be merged from history; if not, see WP:RFD." 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of fatal dog attacks in the United States

NO CONSENSUS
The result was no consensus. Many rationales were offered for deletion, both in the nomination and in some of the further participation. These primarily come down to:
Extended content

Violations of What Wikipedia is not. This article doesn't fit really comfortably in most of the examples of "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" and "Wikipedia is not a memorial site / news aggregator", but it definitely has significant elements of those things, and participants are fairly split on whether it applies. I don't think this particular line of argument is going to settle itself any time soon, because the policy itself does not present a real bright line on this kind of list article. Good faith editors differ on the interpretation. Violation of Notability (standalone lists). There's a reasonable argument that this is a valid split of other, more general articles, and sources have been presented that discuss this topic as a whole, which is usually the criterion used to determine whether a group of entries warrant a standalone list article - but other participants assert that much of this coverage is rather questionable, and this starts to cross into very emotive territory regarding certain advocacy groups. This notability guideline is one of the more vague ones we have, and it again appears that good faith editors differ over its application to this article. Beyond those two core arguments, other concerns regarding bad sources and potential BLP issues are mostly editorial issues for individual entries, and there's definitely not an agreement here that the sourcing itself is poor enough to warrant deletion of the article as a whole on that basis.

Some "other stuff exists" arguments were debated here, and they have rather more validity than usual in one sense: This is probably the most emotive and divisive of the many "List of fatal <animal> attacks" that we have, and it might yet be that a more sensible way of handling this long-term disagreement is an RfC to specifically try and work out a consistent guideline for how we should handle them en masse. This is an issue that needs to be settled, but this discussion has reached no clearer consensus than the previous one, and that shows no sign of changing here.

~ mazca

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Three articles nominated so far. There are dozens of list articles about people dying in various places by various types of animals. Plus many more about people dying from all manner of other things. Anyway, are there any published government documents, scientific studies, or reliable sources covering this enough to prove it notable? Dream Focus 16:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This particular list (part of a set of three, which are all splits from a too-large main article) is occasionally attacked by advocates who want this information suppressed (not as an improvement of the encyclopedia, but for their advocacy). Meatpuppets are always dragged out for this topic for vote stacking. Please consider participating in the AfD. Vote your conscience after evaluating the article, but please participate. Normal Op (talk) 06:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wait who would want dog attack information suppressed? Is it even possible to suppress the well known fact that dogs sometimes fatally attack humans? TryKid [dubious – discuss] 07:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@TryKid: Those who advocate for the type of dog that appears most frequently on the list. Normal Op (talk) 07:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That information can't really be suppressed, right? There are probably statistics available on which type of dogs kill most, these statistics can be easily added to Fatal dog attacks article. Wikipedia shouldn't be used as a database to store every single instance of fatal dog attack that made it to the local news. Regards, TryKid [dubious – discuss] 07:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh come on. "POV pushers are out to get this article" is not a neutral summary. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 01:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hamilton McWhorter III

Ron Oden

KEEP
The result was keep. Vanamonde

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hard to believe sources aren’t plentiful for this mayor of Palm Springs. Gleeanon409 (talk) 08:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tri City Mall

KEEP
The result was keep. Tone

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

And there is a pending DYK. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK Hamilton McWhorter III

CONGRATS
Good DYK

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

One of our rescues was Promoted at DYK...Hurray. Thanks ARS and thanks 7&6. Lightburst (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hamilton McWhorter III

On 4 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hamilton McWhorter III, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hamilton McWhorter III (Congressional Gold Medal pictured) was the first F6F Hellcat pilot to achieve double-ace status? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hamilton McWhorter III. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hamilton McWhorter III), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Castle Grayskull

KEEP
The result was keep. Eddie891

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I never watched this myself but one can't help being aware of it; it's like Camelot. So, do you have the power? The power of Grayskull! Or is that Greyskull? Opinions seem to differ... Andrew🐉(talk) 11:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Skeletor Lightburst (talk) 21:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Dog camp

KEEP
The result was keep. Article is in bad condition, but problems severe enough to require deletion have not been demonstrated. Substantive coverage of the concept as distinct from a kennel has been demonstrated, and while a merge to kennel involving an expansion of scope of that article is feasible, it is outside the scope of this discussion. Vanamonde

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know that it has been scientifically shown that dogs "enhance the social atmosphere at work"? Famously, on the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog and Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Let your dogs off the leash! Andrew🐉(talk) 10:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of internet stock characters

DELETE
The result was delete. Eddie891

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I believe this is notable list. Some help with finding sources to prove it and discussion on what to name it would be helpful. Dream Focus 00:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
REDIRECT
The result was redirect to Email. Sandstein

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You've Got Mail! I started to clean up the layout, and added some navigation and categories. Not sure how to lay this one out without it becoming promotional? Lightburst (talk) 23:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Project Bay Cat

KEEP
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Aaqib Anjum Aafī

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I ran across this and quickly found some sources, google books, and scholar might have more. It’s a cat trap-neuter-release hybrid project that is textbook successful. Gleeanon409 (talk) 14:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jokerz

REDIRECT
The result was redirect to List of Batman Beyond characters. Tone

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Todd Krasnow

NOMINATOR WITHDREW
The result was keep. Consensus for Keep. Identification of Clio award, as Oscars for advertisers from Time magazine references indicates notability. (non-admin closure) scope_creep

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  • Take a stab at this bio. TK is a Businessman who was on the Staples Inc. founding management team: and it is apparently the world's first office superstore which grew into a $7 billion business over 12 years. Did he get some press for Staples and...He is responsible for the company's naming of the Los Angeles Staples Center? Is there press? Lightburst (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of tallest buildings in Montgomery, Alabama

DELETE
The result was delete. After extended time for discussion, I find that there is consensus to delete this list as failing WP:LISTN. In theory, of course, editors with an interest in doing so could create a list of the tallest buildings in every state, county, city, town, village, and neighborhood. While this seems natural for cities known for the height of their buildings like Chicago, and New York, at some point, there must be a cutoff. The consensus here represents a definition that the city for this list is below that cutoff. BD2412

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

List of association football players by nickname

DELETE
The result was delete. Fenix down

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This is a curiosity – a well-made page with 248 citations is nominated by its creator. Can anyone solve the mystery? Andrew🐉(talk) 10:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Draft:Amei Wallach

CLOSING
Was opened for 14 days

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Need some notability advice for a potential article. This art critic likely meets notability under a creative metric but I’m not terribly familiar with judging those. She is a prolific writer and has made a few documentaries but I’m not sure if that’s enough. Any help is appreciated! Gleeanon409 (talk) 15:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Drag Race

KEEP
The result was keep. Black Kite

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Unless I’m missing something, this is just the newly formed, and under-developed parent article to the growing list of RuPaul’s Drag Race shows, and DragCons. Gleeanon409 (talk) 12:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Individual

KEEP
The result was keep. Eddie891

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wikipedia started in January 2001. This article was created less than three months later and so must be one of Wikipedia's earliest. If it was deleted it would soon be recreated but this does not seem sensible. Perhaps you can help in your own individual way? Andrew🐉(talk) 12:56, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sports Nippon

CLOSING
Was open for almost two weeks so closing.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This article has languished for years, at one point filled with spam links, it was moved to draft incorrectly, moved back to main space, and ignored. One WP:42 reference will save it. I have no skill for finding Japanese references, but someone here does. Please find that reference and then remove the PROD. Please do not just remove the PROD. Fiddle Faddle 07:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe try google scholar—“Sports Nippon” Japanese journalism. Gleeanon409 (talk) 08:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hasdeo Arand

CLOSING
Was open for almost two weeks so closing.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

As another change from the usual deletion debates, here's a topic which is In the News. The page is new and seems difficult to source in English so someone with expertise in Indian languages might be able to help expand it. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Gwildor

DELETE
The result was delete.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The Google news results have a lot to sort through. But having that many places mentioning the character, surely some of them give enough detail about him to count. Dream Focus 01:08, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How He-Man Mastered the Universe: Toy to Television to the Big Screen, Art of He Man and the Masters of the Universe - Page 177, TV Guide - Volume 36 - Page 108, Mastering the Universe: He-man and the Rise and Fall of a ...
may help. Gleeanon409 (talk) 01:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Joost de Valk

NO CONSENSUS
The result was no consensus. Arguments have ranged from deleting to keeping and improving, and everything in between. Ritchie333

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

  • Sadly this is a spillover from a discussion at ANI - Levivich pontificated about the merits of the article and JzG agreed with the comments, and then JzG redirected the article, when I reverted, it was immediately nominated for deletion by JzG. The article was started from scratch just a few days ago, WP:IMPERFECT and has nothing to do with the first AfD. There is a Business Insider article which appears in the de Valk article, and a PC Magazine article (which is not yet in the article). I am sure we can find more in Dutch sources. Google Joost de Valk and 388,000 is the number. No primary sources needed, as there are enough which were used to establish work history. WC. Never give up! Lightburst (talk) 16:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Article_Rescue_Squadron_–_Rescue_list&oldid=979459355"