2014 Snapchat hack: Revision history

12 April 2017

• curprev 23:1023:10, 12 April 2017 ClueBot NG talk contribs m 58 bytes −33 Reverting possible vandalism by 2606:A000:6957:9D00:D141:75B6:4A9:B592 to version by 0xF8E8. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3004290) (Bot) undo
• curprev 23:1023:10, 12 April 2017 2606:a000:6957:9d00:d141:75b6:4a9:b592 talk 91 bytes +33 fixed typo undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

4 July 2016

• curprev 10:0210:02, 4 July 2016 0xF8E8 talk contribs m 58 bytes −124 rm extraneous text on redirect undo
• curprev 04:3204:32, 4 July 2016 86.153.240.203 talk 182 bytes +124 Added external website for reference, backing up the original article. undo Tag: Visual edit

9 July 2015

• curprev 17:3717:37, 9 July 2015 Samsara talk contribs m 58 bytes +14 fix redirect destination undo

10 February 2014

• curprev 17:2417:24, 10 February 2014 67.220.154.178 talk 44 bytes +5 ←Redirected page to Snapchat#Hack undo

30 January 2014

• curprev 04:5304:53, 30 January 2014 NickPenguin talk contribs 39 bytes −8,116 #redirect Snapchat {{R from merge}} undo
• curprev 00:0100:01, 30 January 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 8,155 bytes +18 Dating maintenance tags: {{Afd-merge to}} undo

29 January 2014

• curprev 23:4123:41, 29 January 2014 RoySmith talk contribs 8,137 bytes −32 fix template undo
• curprev 23:3723:37, 29 January 2014 RoySmith talk contribs 8,169 bytes −308 add afd-merge template undo

28 January 2014

• curprev 12:1612:16, 28 January 2014 Ethically Yours talk contribs 8,477 bytes −113 Fix undo

27 January 2014

• curprev 19:4519:45, 27 January 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 8,590 bytes +18 Dating maintenance tags: {{Dubious}} undo
• curprev 19:2519:25, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,572 bytes −565 drop low-quality (for tech) sources like USA Today and Forbes; condense undo
• curprev 19:2119:21, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 9,137 bytes +24 No edit summary undo
• curprev 19:0619:06, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 9,113 bytes +178 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:5918:59, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,935 bytes +422 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:4718:47, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,513 bytes +3 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:4418:44, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,510 bytes +56 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:3218:32, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,454 bytes −70 well, this source also says august, which isn't a week undo
• curprev 18:2918:29, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,524 bytes +142 No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:2118:21, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,382 bytes +248 duhh undo
• curprev 18:1518:15, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,134 bytes +97 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:2414:24, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,037 bytes +8 →Public response undo
• curprev 14:2314:23, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,029 bytes +9 →Public response undo
• curprev 14:1314:13, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,020 bytes +3 →Public response undo
• curprev 14:1214:12, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 8,017 bytes +658 →Public response: that headline (which isn't necessarily written by the same author as the article) is the purest example of yellow journalism I've seen in a long time. The text is not far behind, but at least gives more context for the claim. undo
• curprev 14:0614:06, 27 January 2014 Someone not using his real name talk contribs 7,359 bytes −345 no, the source doesn't say that undo

20 January 2014

• curprev 15:5715:57, 20 January 2014 Beerest 2 talk contribs 7,704 bytes +399 Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Snapchat hack. (TW) undo
• curprev 08:3908:39, 20 January 2014 KarronFR talk contribs m 7,305 bytes +1 No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:3808:38, 20 January 2014 KarronFR talk contribs m 7,304 bytes −7 →Public response undo

9 January 2014

• curprev 07:2007:20, 9 January 2014 Ehn talk contribs m 7,311 bytes 0 →Public response: Capitalization undo

4 January 2014

• curprev 22:2122:21, 4 January 2014 Silver Sonic Shadow talk contribs m 7,311 bytes +26 No edit summary undo
• curprev 16:5516:55, 4 January 2014 Antidiskriminator talk contribs 7,285 bytes −550 →Public response: removed assertion which is not directly supported by the source undo
• curprev 14:2114:21, 4 January 2014 Waterfalls12 talk contribs 7,835 bytes −236 Snapchat did issue a formal statement, security through obscurity edit undo
• curprev 01:5401:54, 4 January 2014 BattyBot talk contribs m 8,071 bytes −3 fixed CS1 errors: dates & General fixes using AWB (9832) undo
• curprev 00:4200:42, 4 January 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 8,074 bytes +18 Dating maintenance tags: {{Contradiction-inline}} undo
• curprev 00:2100:21, 4 January 2014 Antidiskriminator talk contribs 8,056 bytes +206 the source actually says "Snapchat has finally responded....Snapchat’s response isn’t as slow as it might otherwise seem. " undo

3 January 2014

• curprev 21:3221:32, 3 January 2014 85.16.210.77 talk 7,850 bytes +237 No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:3520:35, 3 January 2014 Antidiskriminator talk contribs 7,613 bytes +175 the source does not mention Shapchat owner nor Arik's statement was addressed solely to Snapchat issue undo
• curprev 16:2116:21, 3 January 2014 Ethically Yours talk contribs 7,438 bytes +22 →Response from Snapchat: +ref undo
• curprev 16:2116:21, 3 January 2014 Ethically Yours talk contribs 7,416 bytes +484 →Public response: Add undo
• curprev 15:3615:36, 3 January 2014 Ethically Yours talk contribs 6,932 bytes −71 It's no longer temporary undo
• curprev 15:3115:31, 3 January 2014 Ethically Yours talk contribs 7,003 bytes −320 Remove possible undue weight issue undo
• curprev 15:2815:28, 3 January 2014 Ethically Yours talk contribs 7,323 bytes −175 →Public response: From ref: Arik Hesseldahl, senior editor at Re/code, said, "Today would be a good day to think like a hacker or a stalker and revisit whether or not your code has weaknesses that [you] could be forced to apologize for later." undo
• curprev 15:2415:24, 3 January 2014 Ethically Yours talk contribs 7,498 bytes −35 →Response from Snapchat: Fix issues raised undo
• curprev 13:5213:52, 3 January 2014 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 7,533 bytes +18 Dating maintenance tags: {{Contradiction-inline}} undo
• curprev 13:3113:31, 3 January 2014 Antidiskriminator talk contribs 7,515 bytes +22 tagged with multiple issues undo
• curprev 13:2913:29, 3 January 2014 Antidiskriminator talk contribs 7,493 bytes −22 attributing statement to its author undo
• curprev 13:2113:21, 3 January 2014 Antidiskriminator talk contribs 7,515 bytes +175 tagging with failed verification tag undo
• curprev 13:1813:18, 3 January 2014 Antidiskriminator talk contribs 7,340 bytes +82 →Public response: still undue weight by presenting a full quote of one user's statement, her birthday... undo