Jump to content

Jean-François Gariépy: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

18 December 2024

10 December 2024

9 December 2024

4 December 2024

4 November 2024

3 September 2024

27 August 2024

18 August 2024

16 July 2024

27 June 2024

24 May 2024

21 May 2024

  • curprev 19:5519:55, 21 May 2024 AnomieBOT talk contribs 13,559 bytes +541 Rescuing orphaned refs ("auto1" from rev 1215713933) undo
  • curprev 17:5517:55, 21 May 2024 2a0a:ef40:61c:e901:8975:c961:6e15:fbd2 talk 13,018 bytes −1,824 To be honest the rest of the science section can probably go too. Its not notable at all (unrelated to what he is acutally "famous" for, and it probably does violate wikipedia synthesis policies since none of the sources are even about this person specifically, they are just generic sources about researchers who applied for epstein money undo Tag: section blanking
  • curprev 17:5117:51, 21 May 2024 2a0a:ef40:61c:e901:8975:c961:6e15:fbd2 talk 14,842 bytes −2 This person is noteworthy for his political commentary, not for his academic career (which is mostly non-existent). As such, the commentary should go first. There is also no need for the science section to be so long, since this person is completely unnotable as a scientist and would not qualify for a wikipedia article on the grounds of his academic profile undo
  • curprev 17:4617:46, 21 May 2024 2a0a:ef40:61c:e901:8975:c961:6e15:fbd2 talk 14,844 bytes −2,581 Personal life: None of this seems noteworthy or relevant? Also it seems deliberately selected to discredit the person. Its maybe difficult to judge because it probably technically doesnt violate the 'no syhthesis' policy, but it everything here is clearly cherrypicked from his biography to create a negative impression. Its also telling that every one of the sources is on "the other side" of the political spectrum writing to discredit him. But regardless of politics, its simply not relevant undo Tag: references removed

26 March 2024

15 February 2024

14 February 2024

6 February 2024

26 December 2023

23 December 2023

13 December 2023

1 November 2023

30 October 2023

  • curprev 15:1615:16, 30 October 2023 Trafficr talk contribs 16,067 bytes −595 Personal life: The as written paragraph is indiscriminate and of no relevance to Jean-François Gariépy. Two of the four sources listed implicate Gariépy in this matter and are magazines: Poor quality sources. The paragraph doesn’t implicate Gariépy making it irrelevant. The paragraph needs to be phrased better and worded to be relevant to this article. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted

29 October 2023

22 October 2023

19 October 2023

13 October 2023

10 October 2023

9 October 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)