Jump to content

John Lear: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 November 2024

19 November 2024

3 November 2024

2 November 2024

1 November 2024

27 October 2024

23 October 2024

16 October 2024

14 October 2024

25 September 2024

16 September 2024

24 August 2024

23 August 2024

5 August 2024

7 July 2024

3 June 2024

7 April 2024

5 December 2023

25 October 2023

26 September 2023

7 September 2023

4 September 2023

1 September 2023

28 August 2023

27 August 2023

  • curprev 10:2110:21, 27 August 2023 Adakiko talk contribs m 26,735 bytes +2,240 Reverted edits by 98.20.107.58 (talk): not providing a reliable source (WP:CITE, WP:RS) (HG) (3.4.12) undo Tags: Huggle Rollback Reverted
  • curprev 10:1210:12, 27 August 2023 98.20.107.58 talk 24,495 bytes −2,240 Lazar’s claims can no longer be simply wrote off as insanity now that the US government has acknowledged unidentified objects and recent intelligence whistleblowers have claimed of craft retrieval and back engineering programs. The language and tone in these articles need to be less absolute. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 10:1110:11, 27 August 2023 Feoffer talk contribs 26,735 bytes +583 rv recent changes by ip editor. Yes, UFO/UAP is less stigmatized than it was a decade ago, but Lear was still discredited purveyor of conspiracy theories, whatever the reality of the UAP phenomenon turns out to be. Also, roswell was not four weeks after Kenneth Arnold undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • curprev 10:0010:00, 27 August 2023 98.20.107.58 talk 26,152 bytes −567 Although his claims were dubious at best; he can no longer be accurately implied to be a qack because indeed the UFO phenomenon does exist. undo Tags: Reverted section blanking Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 09:5609:56, 27 August 2023 98.20.107.58 talk 26,719 bytes −16 Due to recent revelations I changed some wordings and dates to increase accuracy and to work towards removing the ridiculous stigma that was once associated with these accounts. This stigma clearly no longer exists now that we all know that the UFO(UAP) phenomenon does indeed exist. Many Wikipedia pages that deal with this type of subject matter need to be reworded so that the tone used isn’t one of absolute ridicule and instead one of reasonable curiosity. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

26 August 2023

20 August 2023

8 August 2023

2 August 2023

30 July 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)