Jump to content

User talk:ToBeFree

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Blablubbs (talk | contribs) at 15:16, 6 April 2021 (IP Block: guess who's back). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

To add this button to your own talk page, you can use {{User new message large}}. It can easily be modified: Colorful examples are provided on the "Template:User new message large" page.
Please note that you are currently not logged in.
This is not a general problem – you can leave a message anyway, but your IP address might change during the discussion, and I might end up talking to a wall. Creating an account does not require an e-mail address; all you need is a password and a name. You are not required to do this, but please consider creating an account before starting long-term interactions with other users. Thank you very much in advance.


The children's film unexplained removal vandal

Well apparently they've been doing this nonsense for years, and on the same IP address range. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blakegripling ph, yup, that's a pretty persistent case with a static /64 IP address range, which is completely weird and convenient at the same time. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
You blocked Birdglare! Treedrop (talk) 13:30, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP Block

You blocked 212.77.152.93 this morning for harassment/edit warring; they switched to 41.66.203.14 and continued. Could you block that IP for a week as well? Thanks. Grandpallama (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Grandpallama, Thank you very much for the notification – please let me know if this continues, and feel free to revert their block-evading edits. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) They're using a type of proxy service that's hard to detect and block, so this might require some whac-a-mole (extending the IP blocks won't help, the proxy endpoints behave exactly like regular residential IPs). Blablubbs|talk 14:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks. I do sometimes choose at least a few weeks as a block duration for such cases, perhaps just to clarify that any further edits from the same user are not only practically, but also technically block evasion and qualify for reversion without much discussion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I think that's a good strategy – I didn't mean to imply that your blocks were excessive, just that lengthening them significantly (i.e. the typical 6-24 months that people hand out for normal proxies) wouldn't really keep the proxies blocked in most cases (and it can lead to collateral in countries where ISPs have lots of users on the same shared IP). Blablubbs|talk 14:38, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I'll keep that in mind, thank you very much – I now also remember User_talk:ToBeFree/A/3#Proxy_IP_block which was probably a similar case. I was hesitant to remove, even to shorten, the block there, but you're correct and there was no vandalism from the IP address ever since. 🙂 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, same deal – pretty likely to even be the same service. We're wading into beans-ish territory here, but I can send you an e-mail if you're interested in the technical details. Best, Blablubbs|talk 15:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, they're back: Special:Contributions/41.215.171.43. Blablubbs|talk 15:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense, based on the geolocation data. Grandpallama (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]