User talk:Deepfriedokra

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user lives in Florida and may be found unresponsive

Start a new discussion thread

User talk:Deepfriedokra/archives

User:Deepfriedokra2

So there's a User:Deepfriedokra2. I've been thinking about changing my username to User:Lichenous rock, and the need to avoid confusion makes sense to me. Thoughts and feedback invited, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But what if someone makes a Lichenous rock 2? Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 22:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Moneytrees: I think Lichenous rock is cooler. Which is less uncool? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lichenous rock isn't that bad or anything, Deepfriedokra is just an S-tier username easy. There's not much beating it. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 23:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think User:Licentious rock is inappropriate. Oh, wait... --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do my best. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhhh... Is a block warranted? Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GHA Page

Hi there

You recently deleted a page that didn't meet Wikipedia's requirements. I was hoping to address your concerns and build on the page that I had already written. It says that I can reach out to you to recover the deleted page?

Please let me know if you can assist.

Warm regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpecialKCereal8 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SpecialKCereal8: I'm sorry, but that was wholly promotional content mostly if not entirely sourced to the subject. It needs to be completely rewritten from scratch with information cited to reliable sources unconnected with the subject. Please see the deletion notice on your talk page for further guidance. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Artice

Hi,

You deleted an article galaxy heroes (cryptocurrency) because it was promotional. Well, it was actually highly promotional but I want to rewrite it. Don't know if you could restore it so that I can work on it then submit it as a draft for review.

Regards Mastetchi (talk) 22:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mastetchi: (@GorillaWarfare: for her thoughts.) I'm sorry, but Galaxy Heroes (Cryptocurrency) was wholly promotional content. (WP:G11]]) It needs to be completely rewritten from scratch with information cited to reliable sources unconnected with the subject. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :@Deepfriedokra:

Mastetchi (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Deepfriedokra:

Just to inform you that article has been rewritten and draft submitted Regards

Mastetchi (talk) 12:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mastetchi: Great. We'll see what the reviewers think. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem to be on top of things

There's a user (User:TanweerBashir) who has been evading a declined article creation. I can't continue adding the template without running up against 3RR, but the page is here: Draft:TanweerBashir. Thanks for all the hard work you're doing! Photonsoup (talk) 23:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Photonsoup: Reverting vandalism isn't 3rr. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, wasn't 100% sure about that specific application but didn't want to engage in an edit war in any case. Photonsoup (talk) 23:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Photonsoup: That page does not meet WP:G11. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my addition, it's another users and was deleted by the person who created the page, I just rolled it back with a note that I wasn't the person who added the template originally. I should have checked that myself, though. Photonsoup (talk) 23:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Bradbury deleted though 'cause there were too many already. I blocked for 31 hours. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

Thank you for helping me dealing with those troublesome IP and new users! UNITE TOGETHER, STRIVE FOR SURVIVAL! 09:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Beegee Employment Agency

You may wish to revoke TPA.--Cahk (talk) 09:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Indeed, I have done that. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sikri Kalan

(redacter)

First of all, I want to apologize to all of you if I said something wrong to you.

So the thing that is arising is that you are redirecting Sikri Kalan Page to Sikri Khurd Page. So this is Wrong because Sikri Kalan and Sikri Khurd both are different villages in Modinagar.

So what happened earlier? Somebody made a page of Sikri Khurd and put the details in it, but after that, he did not make a page of Sikri Kalan and he redirected the page of Sikri Kalan to Sikri Khurd. And for your kind information, I have already told you that both Sikri Kalan and Sikri Khurd are different villages.

Some people believe that I am editing it or changing it for my selfishness. But all that is wrong because I live in Sikri Kalan and I can't read anything wrong about my village.

In the last, I would just like to say that you should first do research on Sikri Kalan and Sikri Khurd and then take some decision so that I am satisfied and all the public who are seeing it should also be satisfied.

Thanks Regards, (redacted)

Some links for research

Sikri Kalan -https://www.google.com/maps/place/Sikri+Kalan,+Uttar+Pradesh+201204/@28.8052756,77.5428826,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x390cf53c66d07db5:0x818ba31ae3ab9b5a!8m2!3d28.8055433!4d77.545462

Sikri Khurd -https://www.google.com/maps/place/Sikri+Khurd,+Modinagar,+Uttar+Pradesh+201204/@28.8134644,77.5585219,15z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x390c8acbd0d022dd:0xad77cc4ec9510834!8m2!3d28.8137958!4d77.5648077

Modinagar - https://www.google.com/maps/place/Modinagar,+Uttar+Pradesh/@28.8358166,77.5368405,13z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x390c8aaeec09f0cf:0xb1471116544b1093!8m2!3d28.8344396!4d77.5698527 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4444ABHISHEK (talk • contribs) 13:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{yo:4444ABHISHEK}} gah! Please do not place personally identifying information on Wikipedia. To protect your privacy, I have removed it.

Now the apology is good, but I'm not someone you insulted. As to whether the article should be or not be as you left it is not of interest me. I just hope you can go forward with out being rude to people, and that you learn how to resolve disagreements with other editors. You need to discuss all of this, omitting personal information, on the talk page. ICYMI, I did not redirect the page, I've no interest in it. Best --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFPP

Hmm? There were already two admins having a cage fight right there. It looks like you may have meant to post at Dominic Fike? Bishonen | tålk 20:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: Yup. Dodgy edit button sometimes drops me in the wrong section. Page fight? Tickets? popcorn? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Bishonen fastidiously fixes the ping template and considers herself pinged.] Merde! Bishonen | tålk 20:50, 12 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

A cookie for you! (Thank you!)

Deepfriedokra,

Thank you for the information about creating pages. I will review the community guidelines prior to submitting future articles. RickyEaton (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Queensland Wood Reference Collection copyvio deletion

Although Queensland Wood Reference Collection copies alot from https://www.chiefscientist.qld.gov.au/science-in-queensland/scientific-collections/wood-reference, that page could be licensed under CC-BY, per https://www.chiefscientist.qld.gov.au/legals/copyright. Techie3 (talk) 03:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Techie3: Unfortunately, there was material the copyvios report reported from a copyrighted source. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question, which copyrighted source? https://www.chiefscientist.qld.gov.au/science-in-queensland/scientific-collections/wood-reference is maybe under the CC-BY 4.0 license, which is allowed on Wikipedia. Techie3 (talk) 03:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the page click here. There's a copyright notice at the bottom. Really, you think I don't know about CC-BY 4.0 ? That's not what it says. But if that's a given . . . .. Please. Take a look. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer this to be settle by AFD, as there is a some chance that page is free licensed. Also the copyvio page has: This article contains an attribution template: {{CC-notice}}. Please verify that any potential copyvios are not from properly attributed sources. Techie3 (talk) 03:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Techie3: What do you think? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, did not see your reply. I've restored. An uninvolved editor has questioned, so it is not CSDable. I'll detag and notify the taqgger. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra And https://www.chiefscientist.qld.gov.au/legals/copyright say that the whole site, except some images is CC-BY 4.0. Techie3 (talk) 03:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. Thanks. Good catch. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]