Talk:Apokpa Marup

India Stub‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Confusion over simple english wikipedia

@Haoreima I need your help. This article and simple:Apokpa Marup seem to not be about the same thing. Do you know much about this? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 02:36, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Immanuelle while not directly related I thought I'd mention it here: I moved the page you created to Apokpa (deity) as pages still link to this (Apokpa) and it is likely the primary topic. Additionally, the phrasing "Apokpa Marup" isn't found in the article. Happy to discuss this! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 05:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eejit43 having looked through the links that go here I can conclude all of them are either intended for Apokpa (deity) or are ambiguous. That is why I did the overwrite.

Having looked at it more I conclude that this article is supposed to be the same as simple:Apokpa Marup and that article is just dramatically better and more succinct. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 06:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have adjusted the links though Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 06:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Immanuelle so would it be more appropriate to merge the articles? ~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eejit43 I merged in the good article content from simple English Wikipedia here on this page.

as far as this page, Apokpa Marup and Apokpa (deity type) are clearly distinct and I see no reason for the former to be under the name Apokpa except that the article creator made a mistake. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 16:34, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Immanuelle Sounds good. I'll stay out of the move request, however, as I'm not familiar with the subject at hand, and I trust your judgement. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 17:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Immanuelle and Eejit43: Wait guys! Sorry for late reply! I was off wiki for many days. I will handle this situation. "Apokpa" is a deity. And "Apokpa Laining" (or "Apokpa Marup") is a religion. I will create independent separate articles for both the topics. --Haoreima (talk) 07:37, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Haoreima sounds good, thanks! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 February 2023

The request to rename this article to Apokpa Marup has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

Apokpa → Apokpa Marup
Apokpa (deity type) → Apokpa

– There's no reason to keep this as the link target, the deity type was the bulk of links to the page prior to me correcting them, this is a religious group secondary to the deities. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 06:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merged moved requested at Talk:Apokpa (deity type)#Requested move 25 February 2023 to here. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

move support! The move is undoubtedly legitimate. I observed the contents and their citations properly. Haoreima (talk) 18:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody seems to disagree so can we just complete the move? Seems like consensus. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 17:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]