Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
Appearance
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
Uncontroversial technical requests
- The Three Musketeers (1973 live-action film) → The Three Musketeers (1973 film) (currently a redirect instead to The Three Musketeers (disambiguation)) (move · discuss) – The picture was a major (award nominated/winning, big box office, etc.) Hollywood production, not just an animated special, and should not need to be subordinatedly disambiguated as it is; the standard form should be sufficient 2601:196:180:DC0:B847:4BCF:ABF5:34E2 (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's to distinguish it from The Three Musketeers (1973 animated film). -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Why was the demand for Three Musketeers content so high in 1973? –
Hilst [talk]
18:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Why was the demand for Three Musketeers content so high in 1973? –
- I should also point out Talk:The_Three_Musketeers_(American_TV_series)#Requested_move_18_January_2019. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's to distinguish it from The Three Musketeers (1973 animated film). -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Third Point Management (currently a redirect to Third Point) → Third Point (move · discuss) – WP:COMMONNAME, WP:NAMECHANGES: The corporate entity's name was changed from "Third Point Management Company L.L.C." in 2006, and they've done business as "Third Point" rather than "Third Point Management" since then. Rockhead126 (talk) 18:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
Contested technical requests
- Dadar Central–Puducherry Chalukya Express (currently a redirect to Dadar–Puducherry Chalukya Express) → Dadar–Puducherry Chalukya Express (move · discuss) – it's only Dadar, not Dadar Central 49.33.206.255 (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Contested. There is a history of move reverts. Please open RM at talk. Maliner (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dadar Central–Tirunelveli Chalukya Express (currently a redirect to Dadar–Tirunelveli Chalukya Express) → Dadar–Tirunelveli Chalukya Express (move · discuss) – it's only Dadar, not Dadar Central 49.33.206.255 (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Contested. There is a history of move reverts. Please open RM at talk. Maliner (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dadar Central–Sainagar Shirdi Superfast Express (currently a redirect to Dadar–Sainagar Shirdi Superfast Express) → Dadar–Sainagar Shirdi Superfast Express (move · discuss) – it's only Dadar, not Dadar Central 49.33.206.255 (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Contested. There is a history of move reverts. Please open RM at talk. Maliner (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dadar Central–Sainagar Shirdi Weekly Superfast Express (currently a redirect to Dadar–Sainagar Shirdi Weekly Superfast Express) → Dadar–Sainagar Shirdi Weekly Superfast Express (move · discuss) – it's only Dadar, not Dadar Central 49.33.206.255 (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Contested. There is a history of move reverts. Please open RM at talk. Maliner (talk) 09:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dadar Central–Ratnagiri Passenger (currently a redirect to Dadar–Ratnagiri Passenger) → Dadar–Ratnagiri Passenger (move · discuss) – it's only Dadar, not Dadar Central 49.33.213.218 (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- This move is potentially controversial as it has been reverted before. Please start a requested move, easiest way to do so is to click on discuss. Lightoil (talk) 16:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Shaari Zedek Synagogue → St. Leonard's Anglican Church (currently a redirect back to Shaari Zedek Synagogue) (move · discuss) – switching redirect page name with existing page name to use most common and longest-standing name for article subject Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- So you think Christianizing a registered historic synagogue is an obviously uncontroversial idea? — BarrelProof (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's been a church since 1944, more than 50 years before the building was placed on the National Register. So you think a building that has been a Black/Afro-Caribbean church for 79 years cannot be called by its name? (P.S. The instructions for this page say to start requests where I placed them and then they get discussed if controversial.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- I find the request to be valid. St. Leonard's Anglican Church has existed for 79 years, over twice as long as the time the building was a synagogue. so the church is eligible for an article under its own name. The present article explains adequately that the building previously housed the synagogue and is in the Register of Historic Places under the old name.
One possible compromise is to do the move and then expand the article with more history of St. Leonard's. Therefore the article will be about the church and not necessarily about the building, which is probably the source of the current confusion.(Edit: see better idea below.) ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC)- It's just not obviously uncontroversial, so it should be discussed. It's in the NRHP for its synagogue origin, and its architecture dates to that, and much of the article is about the history and the building. And people tend to get sensitive about changes of religious identify for places of worship. — BarrelProof (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's not on the NRHP solely for its origins as a synagogue. The NRHP listing also points to its significance as a church. Quote, "The building’s period of significance - 1909 to 1959 - encompasses its constmction and use as a synagogue to its conversion and new use as a church... St. Leonard’s church stands today as a handsome work of architecture by Eugene Schoen, but perhaps more importantly as a remarkable testament to the religious and ethnic history of Brooklyn. The history of the three congregations that the building has housed - Shaari Zedek, Achavath Achim, and St. Leonard’s Church - reflects the evolving population of Bedford-Stuyvesant, the history of Jews and of African- and Caribbean Americans in the borough, and the strength of New York City’s immigrant communities - whether originating in Eastern Europe or the West Indies." The fact that the building has historical significance as a church (and has a substantially longer and ongoing status as a church) weighs heavily toward renaming (while addressing other names with redirects and hatnotes as necessary). Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is likely to be the type of discussion in which everyone is so passionate about their side that nothing changes in the end. (Or in WP Admin-speak: "no consensus".) Allow me to make a suggestion to split the article. The current article can focus on the building and its architectural history, because according to Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features), "national heritage sites" are "presumed to be notable." Then there can be a separate article on St. Leonard's, under the requested name, that focuses on that church's worthy history while mentioning that it is housed in the historic synagogue. That way both the synagogue and the church have their own informative articles without cramming them together, which is the origin of the disagreement we're having now. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's just not obviously uncontroversial, so it should be discussed. It's in the NRHP for its synagogue origin, and its architecture dates to that, and much of the article is about the history and the building. And people tend to get sensitive about changes of religious identify for places of worship. — BarrelProof (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I find the request to be valid. St. Leonard's Anglican Church has existed for 79 years, over twice as long as the time the building was a synagogue. so the church is eligible for an article under its own name. The present article explains adequately that the building previously housed the synagogue and is in the Register of Historic Places under the old name.
- It's been a church since 1944, more than 50 years before the building was placed on the National Register. So you think a building that has been a Black/Afro-Caribbean church for 79 years cannot be called by its name? (P.S. The instructions for this page say to start requests where I placed them and then they get discussed if controversial.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- So you think Christianizing a registered historic synagogue is an obviously uncontroversial idea? — BarrelProof (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- South 24 Parganas → South 24 Parganas district (currently a redirect back to South 24 Parganas) (move · discuss) – it's a district 49.33.217.122 (talk) 17:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- There was an RM in 2020 for this already, so this is potentially controversial. Bensci54 (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- 24 Parganas → 24 Parganas district (move · discuss) – it's a district 49.33.217.122 (talk) 17:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- I think this would be potentially controversial for the same reason as above. There was no consensus on similar moves at Talk:List of districts in India/Archive 1#RM discussion. SilverLocust 💬 18:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Mohali district → Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar district (currently a redirect back to Mohali district) (move · discuss) – actual name of district 49.33.193.138 (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- This move has previously been contested, so this is potentially controversial. You may open a move discussion by clicking "discuss" on your request. SilverLocust 💬 18:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- 25th Special Mission Forces Division → Tiger Forces (currently a redirect back to 25th Special Mission Forces Division) (move · discuss) – The user Goodposts moved the article without any discussion. Tiger Forces seem to be the common name for this Murshid Gharib (talk) 21:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Murshid Gharib: It has been over 4 years since that move, so the current title is stable. There will need to be a discussion first, which you can open by pressing "discuss" on your request. SilverLocust 💬 06:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)