Talk:Snuff (British band)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Just to let you know..
This article needs cleaning up - there are some grievious type and grammatical errors hidden amongst the text and the tone of the article is completely wrong. Remember, this is an encylopaedia, not your best mate ;).
I would rewrite it, but I feel that you [the original author] should be the one to do this.
Good luck!
—MidwinterTalk/Bombard 11:00pm, 8 Aug 2005 (GMT)
live set?
"Snuff's live set involves playful banter between band members and the audience, with set lists normally being ignored in favour of requests."
this has not been my experience of them after seeing them about 10 times, where they ignored most requests. especially towards the end (2003-2005) when they quite often played a load of songs that no-one knew.
this point is part of a wider problem with the article in that it is very chatty and almost like a fanzine in places. i might re-write myself it when i get some time.
Spunkymcpunk 09:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Snuff band.jpg
Image:Snuff band.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Snuff (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140528114338/http://inyaface.co.jp/home.html to http://www.inyaface.co.jp/home.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 10 March 2024
The request to rename this article to Snuff (British band) has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Snuff (band) → Snuff (British band) – Incomplete disambiguation; see Snuff (American band). 162 etc. (talk) 17:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at the pageviews, the British band has over fifty times the pageviews as the American. I think this could be a WP:PDAB situation. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Article was previously at Snuff (country rock band) and wikilinks mostly still point to that title. However, there's still very few hits coming to that article. 162 etc. (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Incomplete disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. WP:PDAB primary topic clearly applies here, given the huge discrepancy in page views. — Amakuru (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I see no reason not to be clearer here. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Neither of these band topics seems very high in readership. The remark above about "over fifty times the pageviews" is incorrect. I see a ratio of about 15 relative to Snuff (country rock band) in the last year. — BarrelProof (talk) 21:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)