Talk:United National Movement

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Ideology

I support only having Liberal Conservatism and Pro-Europeanism in the infobox. Maybe Atlanticism as well. All other descriptors are valid to use in the ideology section down, but let's not get carried away with listing Liberal Autocracy and goofy things like that in the infobox.

I also think the UNM's autocratic tendencies while in government should be highlighted in the lead and this article needs a giant reworking as a whole, but listing Liberal Autocracy in the infobox is pure absurdity. Zlad! (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it "goofy"? Why should not it be mentioned? WP:JDL. The information is sourced. Neither liberal conservatism nor pro-Europeanism includes liberal autocracy per se, support for autocracy is important element of party's ideology. Nivzaq (talk) 20:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because its obvious anti-UNM propaganda. Not to say there isn't a place for anti-UNM propaganda on this article, there definitely is, but putting "liberal autocracy" in the infobox is very transparent of you. I can be petty and just put Russophilia, Authoritarianism, Autocracy, and so on in the ideology section of the GD infobox as well. Zlad! (talk) 20:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"its obvious anti-UNM propaganda". Which one is? The cited sources are reliable and are not "anti-UNM propaganda" but just stating the fact. Which one of the sources is propaganda?

"I can be petty and just put Russophilia, Authoritarianism, Autocracy, and so on in the ideology section of the GD infobox as well"

"GD" page is irrelevant here and such false equivalences can not be used as argument in any way. Nivzaq (talk) 20:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dude come on. I'm making a comparison to make you realize how petty you are acting. Just write a neutral article. Zlad! (talk) 20:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, whatever. I won't restore the information to the infobox. Nivzaq (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to tackle UNM's article sometime in the future (can't promise anything) and I would appreciate if you would provide your POV to the article as well or if you would take the initiative of editing it. This article is in a dire state and needs serious work. Zlad! (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, just once again really poor writing and really bad POV edits. I'm not mad, I'm disappointed. Zlad! (talk) 20:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 October 2024

The request to rename this article to United National Movement has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

United National Movement (Georgia) → United National Movement –

This article should be moved to "United National Movement", with the current "United National Movement" being moved to "United National Movement (disambiguation)" page. This UNM is clearly the largest, most significant and the only relevant one. It is additionally the only UNM which either has parliamentary representation or is not defunct. Large political party's such as Law and Justice have pages without stipulating the country as is is clearly the largest L&J party despite others existing in the world. UNM article should follow a similar example. Zlad! (talk) 21:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. The Caribbean one is very minor and I can't see that the Pakistani one even uses this title. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I recently added a link to it and was very surprised there is disambiguation when Georgian UNM is clearly primary search for most people. Other options do not come close even.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 03:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]