Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
 | If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
- If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Uncontroversial technical requests
- Sintayehu Sallallich (currently a redirect to Sintayehu Sallalich) → Sintayehu Sallalich (move · discuss) – Correct last name per all external links. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Contested technical requests
- Draft:King's Centre for Risk Management is invalid. Must create Draft:King's Centre for Risk Management before requesting that it be moved to King's Centre for Risk Management.– Normally I just request a csd when filling in a redirect like this, but the page is fully protected. Need the draft moved to mainspace as it is good to go. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:47, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose It would be against the AfD consensus. The draft is the same as the article that was redirected as a result of the AfD. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:19, 26 August 2017 (UTC)