Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No. 6207; A Study in Steel

No. 6207; A Study in Steel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability in article or online. Fram (talk) 14:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Looking at online sources, the subject of the article has received coverage from Hackaday ([1]), Silodrome ([2]), The Old Motor ([3]), and has an entry with the British Film Institute ([4]). Looking at book sources, the film was reviewed and discussed in the books Railways in the Cinema by John Huntley (p. 96) and Volume 28 of the London and North Eastern Railway Magazine (p. 145). According to Google Books, the film is also mentioned in other books that I don't have access to. For a film from 1935, offline sources are also likely to exist. MarkZusab (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you user:MarkZusab for your kind explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

The two Google book links are passing mentions. The other three diffs look like personal websites / blogs to me (but I may be wrong about these, feel free to inform me better). The BFI lists (or tries to list) every film made in Britain, it is not an indication of notability (just like a national library collects and documents every book, pamphlet, ... from a country. Fram (talk) 08:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]