User talk:KNHaw

My Talk...

Welcome to Kevin Haw's talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom, and use descriptive headlines when starting new topics. Thank you.

Archives

/Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Archives

/Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

User talk:Iamthelordf

Two admins agree: you were not correct in reporting this account to WP:AIV. Please be more careful. Drmies (talk) 01:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist, were the reverts rollback abuse? They were unexplained, and what they reverted was not vandalism. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies You are 100% correct. I was not paying attention to the actual Instagram handles they were posting but had assumed (absolutely incorrectly) they were posting SPAM in rapid succession. Even though that is a common behavioral pattern in a SPAM account, I have no excuse for not double checking and for not assuming good faith. I have posted an apology to the user and said I hope my errors will not deter them from editing in the future. I will restoring their edits shortly and then will take a bit of a breather from editing. If you feel further action is required, I understand entirely.

Thank you for catching my error and I apologize that it was necessary that you do so.

--KNHaw ^(talk) 19:10, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you KNHaw. I appreciate all the things that you did and that things that you've done for the project. No need to restore the edits: they most likely go against WP:EL, though as you know tythat doesn't make em vandal edits. Thanks again, Drmies (talk) 19:47, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help on this. I appreciate it. --KNHaw ^(talk) 21:18, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am new to WP and having technical difficulties. The information I added was from another WP article.. Still, no good reason for you to undo my changes so quickly. Can you wait for a while until I figure this out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.186.225.47 (talk) 01:18, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why reversion?

I.e. On the '30s Starlet article. Did you just freak out over the bizarre-URL artifact??JerzyA (talk) 06:38, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't freak out - just fixed an error in the URL. "httpsp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/40545491" is not a valid URL. --KNHaw ^(talk) 06:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I'll have to dissect.... hm, I had just saved a talk edit, and no doubt the bad URL was I a separate already fergotn edit. Thanks!
JerzyA (talk) 06:47, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's good to have our work double checked. Please review the change at your convenience and let me know if I did something wrong. Happy editing! --KNHaw ^(talk) 06:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Sorry about the edit, won't happen again. Cheers, Jack — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackinator1500 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Sorry about the edit brother, wont happen again.

Jackinator1500 (talk) 01:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I knew the sandbox existed.

Hi Kevin. I knew the sandbox existed but I read the article wrong. It said 13 provinces and territory's put I only saw provinces.

Thx.

Thepersonwhowritesanything/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thepersonwhowritesanything (talk • contribs) 00:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar Barnstar
	For being unbelievably kind and generous with your awarding of barnstars. I hereby grant you the coveted Barnstar Barnstar! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:19, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]