Jump to content

Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Xaosflux (talk | contribs) at 03:55, 1 February 2020 (Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2020#February 2020: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
    For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.
    You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

    The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

    This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

    If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

    To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

    Crat tasks
    RfAs 0
    RfBs 0
    Overdue RfBs 0
    Overdue RfAs 0
    BRFAs 14
    Approved BRFAs 0
    Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
    No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)
    It is 17:44:11 on November 23, 2024, according to the server's time and date.


    Resysop request (Dennis Brown)

    Please resysop. Dennis Brown - 03:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Yay! -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Desysoped per own request during Fram incident. Looks good to go after 24 hours. Maxim(talk) 03:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hooray! Welcome back, Dennis, we have sorely missed you! -- MelanieN (talk) 03:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Welcome back! Nosebagbear (talk) 18:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Welcome back! S Philbrick(Talk) 18:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
     Done. Primefac (talk) 02:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Welcome back! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Per the final decision of the arbitration committee linked above, please remove the sysop bit from BrownHairedGirl (current rights · rights management · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) · block log).

    For the Arbitration Committee, SQLQuery me! 22:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    So far as I am concerned, the ArbCom decision is deeply and multiply flawed, so I will be leaving Wikipedia (see User talk:BrownHairedGirl#Statement_by_BHG_on_the_ArbCom_decision) ... but it is also Wikipedia's highest authority in these matters, and is decision is final. So I hope that the community can rely on bureaucrats to implement ArbCom's decision. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:37, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand that. Still, I'm more comfortable with someone else doing it (and it looks like Xaosflux has done that). I wish you well in your future endeavors, whatever those may be. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:33, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
     Done per the ArbCom ruling. — xaosflux Talk 03:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Resignation effective immediately (Pratyeka)

    Pratyeka (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)

    Unless problems are fixed within hours, I am resigning from Wikimedia contributions effective immediately. A series of great efforts, most recently many days creating and updating maps related to the 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak have been deleted or removed. Over the 17 years of my involvement I have noticed a clear, direct and unrelenting change in the culture of Wikipedia, making it ridiculously tiresome to contribute at all, despite bringing a unique skillset as a 20+ year software professional to the projects. I don't have time for this anymore. It's pathetic. Failing a 'fix this' button to save me time, I can only leave. Goodbye. prat (talk) 00:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Pratyeka: Can you be more specific regarding the "series of great efforts" that has been deleted? Links would be especially helpful. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    If this refers to File:2019-nCoV Confirmed Cases Animated Map.webm, politics aside, I found the image helpful. I remember noticing that Taiwan's outline was in grey, a clear reference to its disputed status. There is an open RfC on this at Talk:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak#RfC on map of infected cases that focuses on whether Taiwan should or should not be included in the map. Of course, if consensus on the talk page says that it should not be retained, then it should not be retained. It is unfortunate that these political issues are hindering editing of an article on an international outbreak. Dekimasuよ! 01:42, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict)I believe the efforts largely revolve around Pratyeka's creation of File:2019-nCoV Confirmed Cases Animated Map.gif and File:2019-nCoV Confirmed Cases Animated Map.webm and insertion (e.g., [1], [2], and [3]) where others have removed it (e.g. [4]). See also Talk:2019–20_Wuhan_coronavirus_outbreak#RfC_on_map_of_infected_cases. ~ Amory (utc) 01:54, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done @Pratyeka: it appears you are in a content dispute and those can certainly be frustrating - however there is no way for us 'crats to know if your "problems are fixed". If you want to have your administrator flag removed, please let us know explicitly. I do suggest you try going through some of the routine dispute resolution processes to work on your sticky situation first. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 02:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The following inactive administrators are being desysoped due to inactivity. Thank you for your service.

    1. Mikaey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
    2. Fishhead64 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
    xaosflux Talk 03:55, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]