Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

• To list a technical request: the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

  {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
  

  This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
• If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
• If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Add a new request

Remove all requests

Technical requests

Edit this section if you want to move a request from Uncontroversial to Contested.

Contested technical requests

• Draft:Gaddki (currently a redirect to Gaddi language) → Gaddi language (move) – the draft has been reviewed and is ready for mainspace; see talk page for the choice of title – Uanfala (talk) 19:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Looks like it hasn't been reviewed yet. Please await for the AfC process to complete. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
    • Ugh, I knew it someone would come up with a remark like that. Well, I have reviewed the article (in the real life, non-wiki-jargon sense of the word), edited it and expanded it. I judge it to be ready for mainspace and frankly I don't know what to do with the suggestion that I should somehow be forced to use AfC. I guess I'll have to do the move using other means, so Kj cheetham, feel free to watch the target and when the draft does get moved you're absolutely welcome to take it to AfD if you have any concerns at all. – Uanfala (talk) 20:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
      • @Kj cheetham and Uanfala:. When Uanfala said the draft has been reviewed, he does not necessarily mean AfC review. He meant that he had worked on the draft and he thinks it's ready for mainspace. I will do the move now. Best, —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 20:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)