Jump to content

Talk:ABC Islands bear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:ABC Islands bears)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ABC Islands bears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

0.5 million years

[edit]

The article says "ABC island bears were discovered 0.5 million years ago" - what does this mean? Clearly not by humans there that long ago. Is it that evidence (fossils/frozen remains/something else) was found recently pointing to these bears (or at least some sort of bear in the ABC islands) that far back? 2A00:23C6:148A:9B01:18EE:94D4:76A9:6885 (talk) 12:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hybridization in taxobox

[edit]

This page had a {{taxobox}} which said the species was "U. arctos × U. maritimus", which (at least in my simplistic non-professional view) reflects text in the article saying that they have some polar bear lineage, specifically of the mitochondrial DNA. I changed the {{taxobox}} to a {{subspeciesbox}}, but in doing so, I found that {{subspeciesbox}} didn't play well with the hybridization at the species level, and I was unable to find a way to get it to do so.

However, I noticed that the references on the page (to GBIF and such) refer to the species as "arctos", not indicating anything about "maritimus". So, rather than just give up on {{subspeciesbox}}, I figured maybe the hybridization that was listed in {{taxobox}}'s "species" might have been overzealous rather than standard (like, nobody's ever called me a Homo s. × n. sapiens, as far as I know), and just used "arctos" in the {{subspeciesbox}}'s "species". I left all the hybridization stuff in the actual text of the article alone. But I thought I should put this note on the talk page in case someone who knows more than me (and perhaps knows that I've done something incorrectly here) sees it. - Rwv37 (talk) 21:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]