Talk:Allah

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Allah article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 30 days

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

Q: Surely this article is wrong? You are talking about Allah, but Allah is only in Islam, not other religions like Sikhism and Christianity.

A: "Allah" (which this article is about) is a word; specifically, the Arabic word for the same concept as the English word "God", with a capital G: the single God of a monotheistic religion. You are probably looking for the article God in Islam, which discusses the specific concept of God in the context of Islam.

Q: Surely this article is wrong? Allah is not the same as the Christian God.

A: This article is about the word "Allah", and its use in Arabic and other languages. Please take your religious disputes elsewhere.

Allah has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 3, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
February 14, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
March 2, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
April 3, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
Current status: Good article

Islam Top‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Mid‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arab world High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion High‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

About translating "Allah"

One should not use God, as this is a biblical concept with a son. Instead one should look at the quranic initials, where one of them is Ein, which indicates to be used with latin script.

For Example: I am a devoté of Ein, Lord of The Cosmos.

This is a fully fluent translation of this phrase, that reflects the quranic teaching in latin alphabet. 84.215.119.50 (talk) 16:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. The English translation of "Allah" is "God" with a capital G. Reliable sources don't say otherwise. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Anachronist God is derived from the tribal totemic deity of the Germanic peoples, originallt written as Got/Gott.aaa 2A02:C7C:AEC7:EA00:94CE:CFA3:86F7:8FD3 (talk) 10:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From where it based into common English, which is the form in which English RS use it. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is Quran not a “Reliable Source”? Opinionated claims contradicting Quranic content are not accurate 129.137.96.13 (talk) 19:27, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be some difficulty of people understanding Ein and it is associated with unserious "Sami" people aswell.

One may want the full association to then Ála and this is the correct spelling for this then. (Or there will be symbolconflict.) Ála The Right God, as the phrase would go. (and God is a word that needs to be supplied a right concept or it will be wrong. The linguistics of right/wrong here are correct.)

Serenity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:FE1:7001:F100:75F7:ACED:5D9C:F2A0 (talk) 09:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be some difficulty comprehending English. This is the English Wikipedia, and we spell it as "God" with a capital G when referring to the Abrahamic deity (Allah, Ála, Yahweh, Jehovah, whatever), and "god" with a small g when referring to a generic deity. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The image caption immediately below the § Etymology header includes a broken section link to Hamza#Hamzat al-waṣl ( ٱ ). It should be corrected to point to Hamza#Hamzat al-waṣl (ٱ) instead:—

Thank you. 104.246.217.171 (talk) 19:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done PianoDan (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation and the hamzat waṣl?

Related to my above edit request, there appears to be some sort of contradiction on this page between the assertion in the component image illustrating the § Etymology section, which includes a hamzat waṣl over the initial alef, and the assertion in the § Pronunciation section that 'the initial alef has no hamza.' While I am aware the hamza is often omitted in non-liturgical writing, it clearly exists in the illustration and is præsent in the Qur'an, but the pronunciation section is also not wrong in its assertion that 'the initial [a] is elided when a preceding word ends in a vowel.' Perhaps someone with better knowledge of the Arabic language could emend the article to clarify the inclusion or non-inclusion of the hamza and its effects, if any, on the pronunciation. 104.246.217.171 (talk) 19:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]