Talk:Baikonur Cosmodrome Site 109

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Baikonur Cosmodrome Site 109 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Fixed coordinates

The coordinates given for this pad (45°57′09″N 63°26′43″E / 45.95250°N 63.44528°E / 45.95250; 63.44528) were wrong - those referred to a disused, overgrown pad. The coordinates for this site on the main Baikonur Cosmodrome article (45°57′04″N 63°29′49″E / 45.951°N 63.497°E / 45.951; 63.497) are correct. Google and Bing satellite imagery of that location exactly matches the actual TanDEM-X site shown in this news broadcast. -- Finlay McWalterჷTalk 14:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]