Talk:Deforestation in Brazil

Brazil High‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Forestry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Amazon rainforest was copied or moved into Deforestation in Brazil with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Falcanta.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

/_) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.205.208.219 (talk) 00:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

this article needs an overhaul, as it's neutrality is questioned, being excessively referenced to Greenpeace and WWF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerjojo98 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to the article's reference list. danielkueh (talk) 23:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. While it is a horrible environmental tragedy, it needs some mention of effects on the Brazilian economy. Also, it needs a lot more sources for its current information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.126.154.203 (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right information

This entry reads "In 2012, the Amazon was approximately 5.4 million square kilometres, which is only 87% of the Amazon’s original state.[2]", but reference [2] is a review paper from 2008. Therefore it is impossible for it to have any information about deforestation numbers in 2012. Even more, a quick Internet search of this sentence reveals that the source might be "Earth Snapshot" [*] and that the year is in fact 2001. [*] http://www.eosnap.com/deforestation/deforestation-in-brazilian-amazon-rainforest/ Rmolina (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Deforestation in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Causes > Hydroelectric section

Hi there, I made an account just for this. I found this questionable paragraph:

There is one simple method though that could eliminate the formation of methane gas, produced by the rotting of trees (which occurs once the trees have been submerged by the water), and which could also reduce the formation of CO², captured/stored in the trees. This method would be the cutting of the trees before the dams are put into operation and the water level is heightened, and selling the wood (hereby using them as timber, for furniture, ...). This way, the CO² stored in the wood is also not emitted immediately, and even if the wood were to be used as firewood (in which case the CO² captured in the trees is indeed emitted), then still no methane would be produced/emitted.

Is this relevant? I feel like it belongs to an article about logging methods or something. I'm going to take the liberty of removing it, feel free to fite me over it

ReiceMcK (talk) 07:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Causes > Cattle ranching and infrastructure

"Cattle emit large amounts of methane" - this is questionable statement. Citation needed. Sure methane is bad but it cattle emits it in negligible amount! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djzatorze (talk • contribs) 18:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Deforestation in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140806144540/http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.htm to http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/Publications/Corporate/NewsOnline/NewsOnline36/beef_exports.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.brazil.org.uk/press/speeches_files/20070705.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 20:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Deforestation in Brazil 2002 to 2008" map in Rates section

Very unclear what this map is actually showing - I can only assume that the red markings are where deforestation has taken place, but there is no explanation of the map so not sure if this is a correct assumption. Reckon a layperson wouldn't be able to understand what this is trying to show; plus the stats would be so out of date at this point it feels irrelevant/unnecessary to have the map in. Maybe better to replace it with something more up-to-date with a better explanation? OliverEastwood talk 09:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Global Extractivism

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nina McCloskey (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Sancar27 (talk) 21:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Geography of Latin America

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 16 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sambrunsman (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Sambrunsman (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]