Jump to content

Talk:Gengar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is it worth putting...

[edit]

...That in Mystery Dungeon, Gengar was the one in the story? Crowstar 11:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From what I gathered from the game itself, that's debatable, but I wasn't paying much attantion at the time... -Jeske (v^_^v) 13:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, if you've done the Gengar & Gardevoir scenario, the disembodied voice thing that tells you to judge Gengar reveals he was the one in the story. Also, Gengar asks Ninetales to "lift the curse you put on me!" ~Crowstar~ 17:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I wasn't paying much attention at the time. -Jeske (v^_^v) 17:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gengar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gengar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 03:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 16:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


@Kung Fu Man: @Pokelego999: I would recommend referring to Raichu to tweak things before I do an extensive review. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  1. Include discussion of Gengar's appearance
  2. Include discussion of Gengar's other forms, as well as a mention of Gastly if possible
  3. Include a mention of being an early design
  4. It may be worth mentioning Gengar being one of Ash's Pokémon

Conception and development

  1. For clarity, did Sugimori design him to look funny, or just felt that the result was funny?

Appearances

  1. Try to match Raichu's Appearances section
  2. I'd recommend reframing it to remove DP, GS, and SM, and adding SwSh since the article doesn't really discuss GS or DP in any relevant capacity to Gengar. You could say something like "Gengar has appeared in multiple entries in the Pokemon series" with citation to verify that, and then talk about XY and SwSh.
  3. Long shot, but is there any source that Gengar can be found in the wild? I know that Sun in Moon, for instance, has a rare chance through S.O.S.

Images

  1. I question the strength of the FUR for the Gengar merch image.

Spotcheck

  1. [1] - The source does not seem to cite certain design aspects of Gengar, such as "its body is also partially submerged into the ground," "its appearance is primarily unaltered," and "its lengthened arms jut from the ground on either side of it."
  2. [2] - The source does not verify that Gengar evolves in a different way in Legends Arceus
  1. [3] Doesn't seem to talk about the changes made to its teeth from fangs (which I don't think is demonstrated by the images in the article). I would recommend making sure the text is verifiable to the images or the article in question.

I would go through and make sure that all content in the first two sections are properly verified. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cukie Gherkin is there anything else that needs to be done on the article? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My b. I checked [4] and have verified it's good. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asides

  1. Hey, still gonna do it, just had my niece over, and she's priority. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Looks good now, passed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]