Talk:Gilbertian mimicry

Gilbertian mimicry has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 28, 2024. (Reviewed version).

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Evolutionary biology Mid‑importance

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology Mid‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gilbertian mimicry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 15:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 15:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Tim riley

And here was me thinking Gilbertian mimicry is writing pastiche lyrics for "I am the very model of a modern major-general". I have read through this article three times in a vain search for something to carp about. All I can come up with is to ask who Georges Pasteur was and what his authority was in such matters. I see he has an article in French Wikipédia, and you ought, I think, to add an interlanguage link to it. I leave you with that thought, because I am promoting the nominated article to GA forthwith, as in my judgement it meets all the GA criteria.

Done that.

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria In my judgment this article could be a worthy candidate for WP:FAC.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Well referenced

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Well referenced

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Well illustrated

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Well illustrated
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I enjoyed reviewing this: it reminded me how resourceful and fascinating Mother Nature is. It is, moreover, crystal clear even to an ignorant layman like me. – Tim riley talk 15:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tim! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]