Talk:Gyatt

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inaccuracy in lede

The word is generally agreed to have originally meant "goddamn", so I think that that meaning should be given precedent over the backronyms listed. Additionally, the pronunciation of /ɡjæ:t/ is also sometimes used. Jim Biden (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary has stronger etymology for the butt-woman sense

We should import it, with proper attribution of course Artoria 2e5 🌉 10:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got the quote in. Not sure about the other parts (which require attribution) yet -- I'm not exactly good at computer-sitting recently. Artoria 2e5 🌉 11:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The woman pronouncing gyat.

She sounds australian to me and i'm not sure if that's allowed when it's meant to be for the UK pronunciation.

I'm new at this so if I'm doing something wrong, please let me know. Audiogamer22 (talk) 06:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gyat is pronounced like

hard g

yaaaaaaaaaaa (a is pronounced like the a in "Ah!")

t

im very bad at describing in text how to pronounce things especially when the word in question is really cringe 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its pronounces as /ɡjɑːt/ Gyatthub (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gyat is the primary term here. 20 August 2024

This edit request to Gyat has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

redirect "Gyatt" to "Gyat" + change disambiguation to "For information about a U.S. battleship, see U.S.S Gyatt. National Telephone of Kazakhstan (talk) 14:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: page move requests should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Bestagon ⬡ 17:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This and the related articles read like an advert for a certain person. Regarding "taxing", my surrounding used the term in the same meaning in the nineties and I have no doubt that it was used worldwide, in many languages and much before that time. ondra (talk) 19:38, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be titled "Gyat" or "Gyatt"? Which spelling is more common?

Should this article be titled "Gyat" or "Gyatt"? Which spelling is more common? DrewieStewie (talk) 03:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I am not listing this as a move discussion yet, because I am not yet firmly in a specific stance of one or another. I should say though that while I have seen "Gyatt" more than "Gyat" on social media, the provided sources seem to be split on which is more common. In the current article Gyatt, its a disambiguation between a ship, this article, and an unsourced alt spelling of guyot, which is mentioned nowhere on the article in question. That last entry does make me wonder if the disambiguation page is redundant. The two potential outcomes I see from this is either the status quo or this article being relocated to "Gyatt", "Gyat" redirecting to that, the guyot linking removed, and a note saying "For the ship, see USS Gyatt". DrewieStewie (talk) 03:15, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gyatt strikes me as more common. Gyattt should be removed from lede. Biohistorian15 (talk) 11:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfC is not for page move discussions, even if you have more than one choice for the new name. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I’ll be more bold then. DrewieStewie (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 September 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Though evidence was relatively scarce, participants largely concurred that the two-T spelling predominates. While the global Google Trends results were split, it was observed that the two-T spelling leads in most Anglophone countries. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:23, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gyat → Gyatt – "Gyatt" is potentially the more common spelling, at least in my experience online (The provided sources seem split). The Kai Cenat quote in the article describing the word’s expanded popularity from his usage spells it as Gyatt. The disambiguation page currently present at "Gyatt" contains an alternate spelling for guyot that is unsourced and mentioned nowhere on the target article. "Gyat" could merge to "Gyatt", guyot should be removed, and the USS Gyatt linking should be a note at the top. DrewieStewie (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading of Beans 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: They're pretty equal according to Google Trends. Sources are also fairly split. I don't think either spelling is particularly more common so there's not really a convincing reason to move. Regardless, Gyatt should redirect here with a {{redirect}} hatnote as Gyat is clearly the primary topic. C F A 💬 21:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Another voice for Gyatt Biohistorian15 has stated in the above section that Gyatt is more common in his view. DrewieStewie (talk) 04:02, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Internet culture, WikiProject Languages, and WikiProject Linguistics have been notified of this discussion. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Some statistics to shows that Gyat is a common name would be more helpful. Best, Reading of Beans 05:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Gyatt is the more commonly used term 2603:3005:2B09:2300:986B:8A38:A3D5:12D6 (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any evidence of this? C F A 💬 12:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: From the Google Trends page mentioned above, it's interesting to me that "gyatt" is more popular in the US, Canada, Ireland, UK, Australia, and New Zealand. While "gyat" has an extraordinarily high percentage in India, which I imagine is for some other reason there. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like the data from the majority of the Western, English speaking world is telling here.DrewieStewie (talk) 01:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article "Gyatt" is a disambiguation page, so split the page first, then move the contents of this article to Gyatt. 92.236.30.187 (talk) 16:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Double t is the more common form. A hatnote should suffice. Frost 10:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support, as it can be seen from social media, "gyatt" is more popular

Youprayteas ^talk^/^contribs 17:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.