Talk:Hubert Howe Bancroft

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Related	This article has been rated as Related-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as High-importance).

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 5, 2019.

No Self Promotional Links Please

Article edited to remove self promotional links to websites.

Appropriate link

Any ideas on why this link is attached to the article? WBardwin 11:36, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The California Birthday Book

The California Birthday Book contains three quotes and a brief biographical sketch of Bancroft.

Further Work

What's here so far seems good, except for the statement limiting the scope of Bancroft's work to the "Pacific coast," which hardly includes Colorado, Utah, Nevada and Wyoming.

There needs to be consideration of Bancroft being charged, as I understand/recall the matter, with giving favorable historical verdicts to people based on their support of his work. Did the AHA take away his membership? I think so, but I can't be sure at the moment. Regardless, that needs to be investigated.

Terry J. Carter (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terry, if this is any kind of complaint then Bob Woodward of the Washington Post would have been a pariah decades ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vertex11 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction?

In the section 'Biography', there is the statement:

"He employed collaborators for the preliminary work, and then revised it all, and wrote the most important chapters himself."

In the following section, 'Critique of production methods', is the statement:

"...he then employed research and writing assistants to organize and produce statements of facts for large sections of a proposed general history. Originally he seems to have intended to use these statements of facts as the basis of a narrative which he himself would write; but as the work progressed he came to use the statements as they stood, with only slight changes."

Do these two statements seem contradictory, or is it just me? WCCasey (talk) 22:55, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@WCCasey: Yes, they are contradictory, and the first statement is inaccurate. It is sourced to a one-paragraph encyclopedia entry from 1900. (cough...republished press release?...cough) Just a couple years later, one of his assistants, William A. Morris, published the article Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 4/The Origin and Authorship of the Bancroft Pacific States Publications: A History of a History (part 1). Since then, it's been well understood that Bancroft's characterization of his role was inaccurate, and came at the expense of his uncredited "assistants," most significantly Frances Fuller Victor. This is a major error in this Wikipedia article, and should be corrected. I'm happy to do so myself, but am still doing a bit of reading to make sure my understanding is thorough enough. I welcome efforts by anybody else in the meantime... -Pete Forsyth (talk) 22:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]