Talk:Sharia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sharia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 2 months

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Top‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political / Religion / Eastern Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Philosophy of religion
	Eastern philosophy

Politics: Libertarianism Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Theology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Tim Murphy (2011-03-04). "Whoops! Alabama Anti-Sharia Bill Lifted From Wikipedia". Mother Jones. Retrieved 2011-03-08. A source on the staff at the Legislature confirmed that the definition [of Sharia law] was in fact pulled from Wikipedia.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

August 15 to 21, 2021

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Mutaween#Other groups|religious police]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Intro

I have tidied up part of the introduction that was not well written grammatically however I feel there is also an issue with the following sentence "There are progressives trying to argue that Sharia is compatible with democracy, human rights, freedom of thought, women's rights and banking." This does not read as neutral language as well as the term progressive being in my humble view somewhat vague and incidental. Imo it would be better to say "some commentators argue that" and leave it there. Firestar47 (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Sharia"

Should the term "Sharia" be written in upper or lowercase? JackkBrown (talk) 15:34, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

dictionary.com records usage as uppercase in American English, lowercase in British English. OED suggests uppercase. Collins goes for lowercase, as does Cambridge, while Merriam-Webster hedges its bets and just states "often capitalized". Bazza (talk) 16:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bazza 7: thanks man! How confusing; in fact, in the article "sharia" is written in both lower and uppercase. I would immediately capitalise all the words "sharia", but the article is really too long to try to correct it (I would only waste time). JackkBrown (talk) 17:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lede NPOV

I think the lede should differentiate between enforcing Sharia law by the state and it being an informal law in some societies. Alexanderkowal (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Section "Contemporary debates and controversies"

According to Wikipedia:Criticism#Philosophy, religion, or politics for religious topics it's usually "appropriate to have a "Criticism" section or "Criticism of ..." subarticle." @Anarchyte since you reverted renaming this section to "Criticism", do you support splitting this section into "Criticism of Sharia" article, and only keeping a short summary here? The section seems to me to be long enough. HudecEmil (talk) 20:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HudecEmil, No need, We already have enough WP:POVFORKS related to critique of Islam and Muslims etc. StarkReport (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on WP:POVFORKS. @StarkReport would you support renaming the section "Contemporary debates and controversies" to "Criticism" in line wtih Wikipedia:Criticism#Philosophy, religion, or politics? HudecEmil (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HudecEmil, The current title appears to more accurately reflect the content, as it primarily addresses the broader heated discourse surrounding Sharia and its implications, rather than strictly focusing on criticisms. We already have articles that deals with such matters such as "Criticism of Islamism, "Islamic fundamentalism", Criticism of Islam", "Islam and violence" and others.

Most of those articles can be coalesced into one, but, as I said "We already have enough WP:POVFORKS". StarkReport (talk) 17:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no comment on whether it should be split, I just oppose the section being titled "Criticism". Anarchyte (talk) 08:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First paragraph

The first paragraph of the article does not make grammatical sense. Sentences are not complete. VickiMeagher (talk) 06:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@NGC 628 has been iterating on this article for around a year. I do not want to demean their contributions in toto, but it is distressing that in some ways this article has become a total mess in terms of organization, as well as English grammar and style. I really hope someone can take a closer look and make copyedits or reversions as necessary, as the article in its present state is rather unacceptable despite the merits of the additions: compare with this version immediately preceding their efforts. Remsense ‥ 论 06:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not feel comfortable doing so, but one of my immediate impulses would be to revert to this previous version and reintroduce @NGC 628's substantial improvements piecemeal. Remsense ‥ 论 06:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you as more interested in Chinese culture than Islamic tradition. Yet, if you able to write more detail about the issues that bother you about the final version of this article, I can work on it.NGC 628 (talk) 06:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]