Talk:Mario & Luigi: Brothership

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Paper doll (video games) (2 participants)
TheoTown (9 participants)
Redout (video game) (11 participants)
Old Grandma Hardcore (4 participants)
CarX Street (5 participants)
WePlay AniMajor (1 participant)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (3 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Developer

I noticed what seems to be the possible beginning of an edit war, so I'm going to nip it in the bud. Someone listed ILCA as the developer, and it was reverted shortly after. Is there any evidence at all that ILCA is developing it? I've seen several different developers speculated, but nothing official. Benpiano800 (talk) 03:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add source for "Gameplay" section

Hi, I came to say that if this source of variety can be used to talk about gameplay to comment on that section. Since the game will be released soon, it would be good to have more verifiable information. 2801:1CA:E:1411:B9FF:BF94:F238:C8CD (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask @The Green Star Collector: what he thinks about the source and if it is necessary to include it in the article. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 18:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate being reached out to for comment! Variety is listed as a reliable source on both Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources and Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources, so I see no issue with using it to expand the gameplay section for now. I anticipate that the section will be heavily revised once the game comes out anyway. ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Green Star Collector: So if it is a reliable source I wonder if you could put it in the article. Since it would be good for you to put it in the section and complete it a bit for the moment. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have implemented the source into the article, primarily adding information about the battle system. ★ The Green Star Collector ★ (talk) 21:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Green Star Collector: I am writing to you again to see if you can expand the "Gameplay" and "Reception" sections, as they are very short. You could use video game media sources to expand both sections and I would also suggest expanding it with the following sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] among others. This is what he told the user since the game will be released soon. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 18:05, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I kindly request that user @The Green Star Collector: please add the sources I posted above to further expand the article as it is very short and the game is coming out tomorrow. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 18:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Green Star Collector: I see that you have already expanded the "Gameplay" section, which makes me happy. Now you could do the same with "Reception". Using the sources I put above and the one already in the article to expand it further, I also give you other sources here: [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] among others. It would only be that to make the article more complete. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 19:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will call @The Green Star Collector: again to see if he can expand the article and all its sections so that it does not appear incomplete. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 18:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it have to be Green Star Collector specifically? And why do you keep constantly pinging them? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because The Green Star Collector is very busy, I will ask user @Blushmallorn: to add the sources to further complement the article. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 21:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't you find the sources yourself? SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 22:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SleepDeprivedGinger: I would, but I won't be able to at the moment because some of the sources like NYT need login to view them and I don't have a subscription to those websites. Also, I'll be focusing on other personal things for the moment and won't be active here. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 19:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is probably the last time I say this. I ask @The Green Star Collector: and @Blushmallorn: users to improve the article. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 18:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Serious problems in the article

Hi, as you may know, I've already said before that the "Gameplay" and "Reception" sections were incomplete. But re-reading the article, I realize that the errors are much more serious. First of all, there are many paragraphs without references, mainly in the "Development" section, where there should be sources to verify the information. But the rest of the sections also lack the same. Secondly, although the "Reception" section is now much better, it still needs a lot of improvement since there are many reviews that can be consulted. It is for these reasons that I am once again calling on users @The Green Star Collector: and @Blushmallorn: to resolve the problem. 181.204.42.146 (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]