Talk:MoonLIGHT
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Claim
[edit]The article claims the experiment should deliver measurements 100x times more precise than current reflects. Such a claim is extraordinary and should require at least a few words of explanation. Has the reflector an area 10000x times as large? What are the means to achieve such a high precision? --140.105.75.83 (talk) 17:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, the claim on x100 better precision is referenced by the cited paper abstract. It is supposed to be a "new approach and technology". Unfortunately, the information/paper is behind a paywall. I'm tagging that entry with {{how}} for follow up. Rowan Forest (talk) 17:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- In this previous paper, they mention the accuracy improvement comes from technology and software that correct for the lunar libration and thermal fluctuations: [1]. Rowan Forest (talk) 18:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- Start-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class relativity articles
- Relativity articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Mid-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Moon articles
- Mid-importance Moon articles
- Moon task force articles
- Start-Class Solar System articles
- Mid-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force