Talk:Top-down cosmology

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 March 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Start‑class Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move

I think this stub could be added to Multi-Universe unless someone wants to expand this. Nescio sed Scio 03:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very interesting subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.120.67.33 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of capitalization of universe

There is request for comment about capitalization of the word universe at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Capitalization of universe - request for comment. Please participate. SchreiberBike talk 00:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of request for comment

An RfC has been commenced at MOSCAPS Request for comment - Capitalise universe.

Cinderella157 (talk) 03:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources plus progress

There is no sources in the article. Was it really Feynman who was the mastermind behind the concept? Do you have an literature? Now we have some evidence regarding the concept: [1] "The only way to reconcile all the observations, Cotler says, is to conclude that the photon went through multiple histories in parallel." Kartasto (talk) 10:09, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More evidence

[2] "The only way to reconcile all the observations, Cotler says, is to conclude that the photon went through multiple histories in parallel." Kartasto (talk) 10:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]