Talk:New English School (Kuwait)

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 July 2016. The result of the discussion was Snow Keep.

Kuwait Low‑importance

	Kuwait portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kuwait, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kuwait on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KuwaitWikipedia:WikiProject KuwaitTemplate:WikiProject KuwaitKuwait articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of New English School (Kuwait) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Kuwait may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. (May 2016) The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Headmistress

Ms. Doran isn't the headmistress of the entire school now is she? From what I know, she's only head of the secondary department. --Ahmed 22:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Canteen vs Tuckshop

If no one minds I'm going to change the word Canteen to Tuckshop since they are essentially two different things and the article is misleading the reader by saying there is a canteen on the school premises when there really is only a tuckshop, two entirely different things. A small change and I'd prefer the editors to post on the disscusion page before editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.54.233.1 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 4 April 2007

Do you have a reference to make this distinction?— ERcheck (talk) 01:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by a reference?

By the way, a canteen is a place where there are tables and you can dine right? But the New English School only has a shop where you can buy food and then go eat it somewhere else in the playground which is a tuckshop not a canteen. So I would like to know who reverted my edit for no apparant reason, and why have I been getting warning of vandalising this page when all I did was change canteen into tuckshop? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.132.250.2 (talk • contribs) 12:55, April 5, 2007 (UTC).

What ERcheck means by a reference is some external document (say, a dictionary) that would explain the distinction that you're trying to draw between a canteen and a tuckshop.

I suspect that the issue here is really a difference between US English and UK-derived English. In US-English, there's no word "tuckshop". I don't know its full UK-English meaning, so can't really comment on whether it's appropriate. (But see the M-W definition, "confectioner's shop".) However, I expect that the difference would be perfectly clear to a UK reader, just as the difference between a restaurant and a cafeteria would be clear to a US reader. Ideally we'd find a word that means the right thing in both variants of the language. Does it serve "real food" (sandwiches, soup, et cetera) or does it only serve snacks (candy, potato chips, et cetera)? If it's only snacks, there are a number of US-English variants (snack stand, snack bar) that might be appropriate. For real food, something like "lunch counter" might be appropriate. I don't know UK-English well enough to know whether they mean the same thing there.

Let's back off and try to find a good answer that's understandable in both variants.

Jordan Brown 04:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's more reasonable to use the word "Canteen" since it can be mean a service where food is served but doesn't have to necessarily have to have table service. "Snack stand" and "Snack bar" are more appropriate but this "Canteen" at the New English School is more appropriate with "Snack bar". It's two counters on a wall on the playground. They are a few feet away from each other with a line for girls and a line for boys. --Ahmed 03:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "criticisms" edit struggle

A list of complaints against the school under the heading Criticisms have been repeatedly inserted and removed. These have never been properly sourced. All students everywhere have some complaint gainst their school, it goes with the territory, but that doesn't automatically make the complaints encyclopedic material. Take the alleged racism for instance - if, for instance, there have been reports in the press about it, it would be a valid inclusion, but without sources it just looks like a random accusation. --Bonadea 07:04, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the criticisms aren't valid because they are unsourced. The article probably needs to be protected. --Ahmed 14:22, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salomon Kalou

Did he attend NES? He's listed under notable alumni. There should be a citation if he did. (Same for Queen Rania too in fact).Eternity52 01:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NESLogo.gif

Image:NESLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]