Jump to content

Talk:Phantom (2015 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MSF controversial

[edit]

Médecins Sans Frontières is currently seeking legal actions against the films production team due to unlicensed and misleading use of their name and logo by one of the main characters in the movie.[1]

CAN YOU PLEASE LEAVE THIS PARAGRAPH IN THE ARTICLE OR AT LEAST EXPLAIN WHY IT IS REMOVED? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cintema (talk • contribs) 09:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ MSF India News. Retrieved 28 August 2014.
WP:UNDUE weight to a minor "controversy" which has little value relative to the subject of this article, the film. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:22, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm agree with TheRedPenOfDoom, actually I wanted to remove it too under WP:UNDUE but just copy-edited it to give some mild look. --Human3015Send WikiLove  15:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is still mentioned in the "Marketing and reaction" section. It might be better placed with other content in the article, maybe in the general "Reception", but we do not need a stand alone section. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. Abusing MSF as cover for Indian forces (even if it's only in a movie) might have a strong impact on security for MSF staff working in Taliban controlled areas. It is therefore highly important to highlight the MSF statement regarding this controversial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.4.26.50 (talk) 19:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We are an encyclopedia. We dont care about "mights" and are not here to promote advocacy.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 16:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First look

[edit]

There is no discussion about first look of movie.i want to known about it's story and shooting loaction. Sourav766 (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 August 2015

[edit]

Vakasahmad08 (talk) 10:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Please note that the page was protected at the time of the request, but protection has expired. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 21:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan Jalebi (Ya Baba)

[edit]

Appropriate source for analysis?

[edit]

The more I think about my edit, the more torn I am. Is the Pakistan based Tribune Express [1] an appropriate source to use for analysis of the critics reaction to the film (as used in the lead), or does the subject matter and the I-P relations make them a less than stellar source for the analysis in this instance and we should not include their perhaps skewed view? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

agree on this.--Human3015Send WikiLove  22:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: We write concluding remarks of the critics, not step by step review, we can find number of sentences on each section of the film. We can't selectively pick line of our choice, concluding remarks matters.--Human3015Send WikiLove  21:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We absolutely are not limited to utilizing "concluding remarks". Newspaper reviews have a specific purpose and our purpose is different. We utilize the most encyclopedic aspects of sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:09, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict)*Every movie critic usually write negative things regarding few areas of the movie and positive things about some other areas. It depends on us which line we pick. But still in Mid Day review in conclusion they have said "film talks about real concerns of all of us", so we can at least write that line. I have removed "Watch it" line, I should not wrote that "watch it", it was by mistake. --Human3015Send WikiLove  22:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Phantom (2015 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Phantom_(2015_film)&oldid=1202424296"