Talk:Astra (American spaceflight company)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Astra (American spaceflight company) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Rocketry Bottom‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 27 February 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 13:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Astra Space → Astra, Inc. – This company is called "Astra" or "Astra, Inc.", not "Astra Space". Rename to "Astra, Inc." à la Tesla, Inc. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 11:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree 2001:18C0:61C:700:A86F:24D7:2D04:E244 (talk) 08:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be the best solution (Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies)). --mfb (talk) 10:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Agree because its most like the WP:COMMONNAME. OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 12:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2020

This edit request to Astra Space has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

2001:18C0:61C:700:2C7E:26E7:2B55:C824 (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please change September 2016 to October 2016 ^[1] 2001:18C0:61C:700:2C7E:26E7:2B55:C824 (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/darpa-launch-challenge

{{not done}} because the citation you provided is unavailable. Thank you. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 04:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The website works for me.

Done --mfb (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HELP ADMINISTRATOR, HELP ADMINISTRATOR, HELP ADMINISTRATOR, Soumyabrata prevents me from telling the truth about this article. MFB you saw my reference which was rejected by Soumyabrata. Can you notify an administrator. HELP, HELP, HELP,|answered=no|ans=no 2001:18C0:61C:700:849C:3108:509A:1CC (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soumyabrata, thinks he's God and don't want us to tell the truth about this article. Thank you mfb. 2001:18C0:61C:700:849C:3108:509A:1CC (talk) 09:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Soumyabrata says my quote is not available. Which is entirely false. Anyone can access it. Besides, mfb had access to it. 2001:18C0:61C:700:849C:3108:509A:1CC (talk) 09:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down. Sometimes websites don't load for whatever reason, or they are down temporarily. That can happen. Don't assume malice when bad luck is a perfectly plausible explanation. Besides: It's not a critical issue if it was September or October. --mfb (talk) 09:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Astra themselves says October [1]. OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 15:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"scrubbed the DARPA launch challenge"?

@Soumya-8974: I interpret the article as just another day of delay. The title is confusing but the article makes it clear that they are still part of the challenge. --mfb (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haven't been following this a lot but this article says they may not be part of the challenge (DARPA?) anymore. OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 15:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SUCCESS, not FAILURES: The launch will be the third for Astra, coming after two launches in July and November 2018. Both launched from the PSCA in Alaska. These were originally believed to be failures. However, Astra stated that the first was successful, and the second was only "shorter than planned". Neither were designed to reach orbit, as they didn’t have functioning second stages.^[1] Cordialement. 2001:18C0:61C:700:3DC6:63EE:9943:BFBE (talk) 06:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/03/astra-darpa-launch-challenge/

Okay, so they still launch, just missed the launch challenge parameters. I updated the article. (@IP: This is about the third launch only) --mfb (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ mfb: Why updated only the third launch? 2001:18C0:61C:700:3DC6:63EE:9943:BFBE (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion here is only about the third launch. Start a separate discussion if there is something else that needs to be discussed. --mfb (talk) 02:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First launch and second launch

@ mfb: Why updated only the third launch? 2001:18C0:61C:700:3DC6:63EE:9943:BFBE (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

This discussion here is only about the third launch. Start a separate discussion if there is something else that needs to be discussed. --mfb (talk) 02:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

SUCCESS, not FAILURES: the launch will be the third for Astra, coming after two launches in July and November 2018. Both launched from the PSCA in Alaska. These were originally believed to be failures. However, Astra stated that the first was successful, and the second was only "shorter than planned". Neither were designed to reach orbit, as they didn’t have functioning second stages.^[1] -- 2001:18C0:61C:700:4CA4:B512:742:DD58 (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/03/astra-darpa-launch-challenge/

Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2020

This edit request to Astra, Inc. has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Addition launch date — CRS-20 (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 01:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket 3.0: https://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/ — CRS-20 (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 02:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possible future launches


Date	Orbit
October, 2020	SSO
January, 2021	SSO
March, 2021	LEO
April, 2021	SSO
June, 2021	LEO
July, 2021	SSO
September, 2021	LEO

Per https://astra.com/?start_date=2020-10-01T00:00:00.000Z& OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 03:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And now there are reports of an anomaly...https://kmxt.org/2020/03/anomaly-at-pacific-spaceport-complex-launch-rehearsal-no-injuries-as-a-result/ OkayKenji ^{(talk page)} 04:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Rocket 3.1 Orbital Launch Attempt Liftoff! (50624215858).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

B-Class suggestions

Hello, I am the "reviewer" of the article. Here's the list of the problems that I saw:

Some of the sources have their formatting broken. The sources are reliable for now. (ex. September 2020, Mike Wall 12)
Lone sentences should be merged to a paragraph, with linking devices (because, as, but, etc.)
There are some inappropriate use of dashes and capital letters, see Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style for more details
A few in-line tags should be resolved , example being ^{[citation needed]}

Other than that, the article should be a B-Class, change the grade when you feel that the article deserved that. Hopefully, you can push this article to a Good Article, in that case, I see you there! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 10:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Rocket 3.1 Orbital Launch Attempt Liftoff! (50624215858).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting Astra Rocket

Seeing as the Rocket series (i.e. Rocket 1 through 3.3) have some pretty substantial history now, and with space launch increasingly in the rear-view mirror for the company, I believe it would make sense to split them off into a separate page, where they might get a nicer treatment (i.e. infobox at the top of the page). I will be starting a draft. Sub31k (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you share the Draft? (EDIT: I found the article) Redacted II (talk) 17:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://spacenews.com/astra-completes-deal-to-go-private/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ⸺(Random)staplers 00:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.darpa.mil/news-events/darpa-launch-challenge

[2] ttps://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/03/astra-darpa-launch-challenge/

[3] ttps://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/03/astra-darpa-launch-challenge/

[1]

[1]

[1]