Template talk:Talk quote inline
 | Template:Talk quote inline is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Edit request 22 June 2024
[edit] | This edit request to Template:Talk quote inline/styles.css has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Add CSS per mw:Recommendations for night mode compatibility on Wikimedia wikis Diff:
| − | + | html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .inline-quote-talk {
color: #00B785;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
html.skin-theme-clientpref-os .inline-quote-talk {
color: #00B785;
}
} |
Andumé (talk) 20:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Done Sohom (talk) 04:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Urgent: Please fix this template for printed content Template:Talk quote inline/sandbox/styles.css.
[edit]Firstly, apologies for writing in English if this is not your first language (this is an automated message).
This template has been detected as one of 436 pages using styles that break the page when printed when the user is using dark mode. The fix is very straightforward - all your styles relating to dark mode must be scoped to. Since there is a high risk of this templates being copied to other wikis it is important this notice is acted on ASAP.
To fix this:
- Update `@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark` to `@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme: dark`
- Wrap any styles relating to `html.skin-theme-clientpref-night` in `@media screen`
If this message has not been acted on in 7 days, this will be fixed by an automated script. Thank you for your help fixing this important issue.
For any questions feel free to ask them at phab:T369874.
Jon (WMF) (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the web team.
Urgent: Please fix this template for printed content Template:Talk quote inline/styles.css.
[edit]Firstly, apologies for writing in English if this is not your first language (this is an automated message).
This template has been detected as one of 436 pages using styles that break the page when printed when the user is using dark mode. The fix is very straightforward - all your styles relating to dark mode must be scoped to. Since there is a high risk of this templates being copied to other wikis it is important this notice is acted on ASAP.
To fix this:
- Update `@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark` to `@media screen and (prefers-color-scheme: dark`
- Wrap any styles relating to `html.skin-theme-clientpref-night` in `@media screen`
If this message has not been acted on in 7 days, this will be fixed by an automated script. Thank you for your help fixing this important issue.
For any questions feel free to ask them at phab:T369874.
Jon (WMF) (talk) 18:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the web team.Weaponising discussions
[edit]This use of green inline is being weaponised in diascussion to make it difficult for some users to follow discussion especially where talk pages become assult courses on the senses of individuals, Please remove the colors and use something less harmful like italics. Gnangarra 11:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can you give examples of this? Largoplazo (talk) 11:46, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Western_Australia#Excessive_out-of-scope_information_and_SYN_on_Esperance_articles_re_traditional_ownership its also littetred though the history of the page with one particular user using it on subject he no knowledge of to wedge discussion and drive users away. Gnangarra 11:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- My perception of it is that the user is addressing specific comments by other users and is using the tag appropriately. Can you explain why you consider this to be weaponization or how the use of the quotes drives users away? What leads you to believe that this is driving users away, or that it's bothering users other than you? I'm sorry for asking so many questions but you stated the situation as though it were obvious and I'm not seeing it.
- As for the green text, it looks fine to me, but if you happen to have trouble with it I can see if you can customize their appearance for yourself. Largoplazo (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Western_Australia#Excessive_out-of-scope_information_and_SYN_on_Esperance_articles_re_traditional_ownership its also littetred though the history of the page with one particular user using it on subject he no knowledge of to wedge discussion and drive users away. Gnangarra 11:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)