User:Dreftymac/Docs/ArgumentByCategory

This is an essay.

It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.

Argument by Category

There is some matter at issue and one of the proponents of a particular viewpoint supports that viewpoint with a generalized appeal to an entire domain or sub-domain of an academic discipline or body of knowledge.

Examples:

all extreme finitists other than yourself recognize that ...
in all of neoclassical economics, there is no disagreement about ...
it is a widely established practice in biology to assume ...
It's proven sociological fact that people have a tendency to ...

implications of "argument by category"

implies the matter at issue has already been resolved;
implies the existence of a uniform, "monolithic establishment" without acknowledging that the establishment is comprised of individuals and organizations, each with unique perspectives;
implies that there is some "fixed practice" (within the establishment) that is not subject to change or refinement;
implies a "fixed boundary" (around the establishment) that is not subject to influence or refinement by related concepts in outside disciplines;

fundamental limitations of argument by category

every major discipline has "grey areas" and "contestable claims";
every major discipline has terms and concepts, the explanation of which will differ depending on which expert you ask;

The less trivial a matter is, the greater its potential for alternate re-interpretation by different people. The more trivial a matter is, the more likely it is to be readily apparent to anyone familiar with the establishment. Therefore, "Argument by Category" is many times either: 1) too obvious to be worth mentioning; or 2) a side-stepping of a matter at issue as though it were not at issue.

Counter-example: basic definitions and comparisons

It is not "argument by cateogry" to present basic definitions or comparisons.

For example the following kinds of statements could be considered comparisons:

Most economists use the greek letter "Delta" to mean "change", but many lawyers use it to mean "Defendant".
In the automotive repair industry, certification is often a pre-requisite for employment, not so for the plumbing industry.
Zoologists tend to apply a different meaning to "endogenous" than most sociologists.

Argument by Category

implications of "argument by category"

fundamental limitations of argument by category

Counter-example: basic definitions and comparisons

See also