User talk:112.200.197.169

August 2021

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Visual impairment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sunbeam. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

112.200.197.169 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why did you block me from editing for no reason? I am not editing disruptively and I am making constructive edits

Decline reason:

If you were not responsible for any inappropriate edits, you may request an account. This IP falls within a range blocked to protect Wikipedia from an abusive user. 331dot (talk) 07:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Abusive user

Am I an abusive user, answer me, administrators. I want to see your answer to me okay.

Are you the same person(s) whose misconduct necessitated the rangeblock? I don't have the ability to say. Even if you weren't, we won't remove the rangeblock, so either request an account or accept that you're collateral damage from dealing with the other abusive editor(s).

Are you the same person who made this improper edit early this morning? Possibly, though there could have been enough time for the IP to be recycled.

Are you the same person who left this abusive comment? Very likely. —C.Fred (talk) 18:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be unblocked please

Graham87, you blocked me from editing for no reason, please unblock me now, because I want to make constructive edits to Wikipedia. I am not making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia and why did you rangeblocked me for no reason? Please unblock me now. You are such a bad administrator, Graham87! I saw it you blocked many IP users for no reason! 112.200.128.0/17 09:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC) Other administrators, please block Graham87 from editing Im so mad at that administrator he blocked me from editing randomly for no reason.[reply]

Attacking the administrator with personal attacks ensures that you won't be unblocked. Furthermore, demands that they be blocked is on the list of bad unblock request examples. 331dot (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.