Jump to content

User talk:209.191.166.202

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hell

[edit]

February 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 00:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Shaun White has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lovin' You, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lovin' You was changed by 209.191.166.202 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-07-22T21:34:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Master P, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Ocaasi (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive contributions to Wikipedia, as you did with your recent edit to Lovin' You. This edit appeared to be vandalism, and has been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 18:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sesame Street Gangsters. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Peter.C • talk 18:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did with your edit to KMEL, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --TwistOfCain (talk) 21:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jimmy Iovine. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wayne Olajuwon chat 21:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with your recent edit to DJ Paul, you will be blocked from editing.

Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 21:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Shaun White, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Shaun White was changed by 209.191.166.202 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-10-22T17:52:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Erik Spoelstra has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bag of holding has been reverted.
Your edit here to Bag of holding was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://nethack.wikia.com/wiki/Container#Bag_of_holding) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Knowledge

[edit]

Hi. Please note that the purpose of the article knowledge is not to play the get-to-philosophy game. Edits whose sole purpose is to "fix" the path to philosophy will be reverted. 50.100.140.159 (talk) 02:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Editorofthewiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Darrell Bevell because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 20:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Anthony Rizzo seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Anthony Rizzo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Procter & Gamble brands have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Everedux (talk) 21:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:209.191.166.202&oldid=1142813100"